The case “GAVIN NEWSOM, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DONALD J. TRUMP, et al., Defendants” revolves around the legality of deploying military forces within California, specifically concerning the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878. The core issue at hand centers on whether then-President Trump’s actions in deploying the National Guard and other military troops into Los Angeles were in violation of the law. The court’s decision, at least initially, appears to side with Newsom and the plaintiffs, issuing an injunction against the deployment. The fundamental concern is that federal military forces were being used for law enforcement duties, which the Posse Comitatus Act generally prohibits.… Continue reading
A federal judge ruled that the Trump administration illegally deployed the National Guard and Marines to Los Angeles in response to protests against anti-immigration policies, violating the Posse Comitatus Act. The judge determined that the administration used armed soldiers and military vehicles for crowd control and other actions, despite the absence of a rebellion or inability of civilian law enforcement to respond. The ruling blocks the administration from further troop deployments in California, though the order is paused pending a potential appeal. This decision followed a lawsuit from Governor Gavin Newsom and raises concerns about the limits of presidential authority regarding the use of the military domestically.
Read More
Following clashes related to immigration raids, a federal judge blocked President Trump from deploying National Guard and military troops in California for law enforcement activities. The ruling, stemming from a lawsuit challenging the deployment, cited the Posse Comitatus Act, which prohibits U.S. military forces from domestic law enforcement. The decision, though limited to California and stayed until September, raises questions about the use of troops in other cities, especially considering Trump’s recent actions in Washington, D.C.
Read More
Exclusive: Military feared mistakes in LA deployment could have ‘far-reaching’ implications, records show. The whole thing sounds like it was set up to fail, doesn’t it? From what I’m gathering, there were serious concerns within the military about the deployment of troops in Los Angeles. The records indicate that officials anticipated that this operation could easily attract protests, possibly leading to escalating civil unrest. The worry wasn’t just about the immediate situation but also about the potential for long-term consequences.
The underlying fear was that a misstep, a mistake in judgment, or an accidental incident could create a dangerous chain reaction, escalating far beyond the initial scope of the deployment.… Continue reading
For weeks, the Pentagon has been developing plans for a military deployment to Chicago. President Trump intends to address crime, homelessness, and undocumented immigration with this initiative. Officials suggest this approach could serve as a template for similar deployments in other major cities.
Read More
In a recent Oval Office address, former President Trump threatened to deploy active-duty military personnel to Chicago, citing an “incompetent mayor” and rampant crime. This move, similar to his actions in Washington, D.C., aims to “straighten out” the city, despite potential legal challenges under the Posse Comitatus Act, which restricts military involvement in civilian law enforcement. Trump claimed this plan, following his successes in D.C., would be welcomed by Chicago’s Black community. He also mentioned similar plans could be implemented in New York.
Read More
President Trump has moved to further militarize Washington, D.C., deploying the National Guard under the pretense of restoring order. This move bypasses the city’s elected leaders and follows a pattern of increased federal troop deployments across the country, including a new “Domestic Civil Disturbance Quick Reaction Force” planned by the Pentagon. The administration is also threatening to exert similar control over other cities. Critics argue that this escalating use of the military for domestic matters is unprecedented and violates the principles of Posse Comitatus, raising concerns about the erosion of civil liberties and the normalization of military involvement in law enforcement.
Read More
The ongoing legal battle in California centers on President Trump’s deployment of the National Guard and Marines to Los Angeles amidst protests against his deportation policies. California Governor Gavin Newsom contends that this action violated the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878, which restricts the use of the military for civilian law enforcement. The Pentagon reports that approximately 250 National Guard members are still active in the state.
Read More
According to a recent report, the Trump administration is considering creating a 600-soldier National Guard force, equipped with weapons and riot gear, for rapid deployment to U.S. cities experiencing civil unrest. The troops would be stationed in Alabama and Arizona, costing hundreds of millions of dollars, and able to deploy within an hour. The plans, outlined in documents compiled by National Guard officials, could be implemented as early as fiscal year 2027. Concerns within the documents included potential political sensitivities and strains on personnel.
Read More
Since June 7, President Trump ordered the deployment of thousands of federal troops to Los Angeles, ostensibly to protect federal functions and personnel. Despite the substantial presence of over 5,000 National Guard soldiers and Marines, their activities have been limited, including a single temporary detainment, and primarily involved guarding federal buildings. Local officials, including Governor Gavin Newsom, criticized the deployment as an unnecessary militarization, particularly given the relatively peaceful nature of the protests. This deployment has raised concerns about the misuse of federal funds, potential violations of the Posse Comitatus Act, and the blurring of lines between military and civilian law enforcement, as well as sparking apprehension among some of the troops involved.
Read More
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker