President Trump has asserted that he could deploy the military to U.S. cities, stating that courts would not prevent him from doing so. He suggested he could invoke the Insurrection Act to bypass the legal system and send in the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marines. These comments, made on Air Force One, have been widely criticized as an attempt to play out a “dictator fantasy,” particularly given existing legal restrictions like the Posse Comitatus Act. Trump’s remarks come amid rising tensions and deployment of the National Guard in cities such as Chicago.
Read More
Speaking to U.S. troops in Japan, President Trump indicated his willingness to deploy more than the National Guard to U.S. cities to address crime and safety concerns. He claimed public support for such actions and asserted that state officials’ cooperation was not essential. This stance echoed earlier comments and followed deployments of the National Guard to various cities. Despite Trump’s claims, polls show that most Americans are opposed to using troops domestically, leading to legal challenges from Democratic governors.
Read More
In response to Chicago and Illinois’ request, US District Judge April Perry issued a partial temporary restraining order against President Trump’s deployment of National Guard troops in Chicago. The judge cited unreliable descriptions from the Department of Homeland Security, stating there was no credible evidence of a rebellion. Perry asserted that federal law only allows presidential federalization of the National Guard under specific conditions, none of which were met. This ruling follows a pattern of legal challenges and restraining orders in other cities like Portland, with contrasting responses from governors regarding the National Guard’s deployment.
Read More
Approximately 500 National Guard members, comprising units from Texas and Illinois, have been mobilized to the Chicago area for 60 days, despite an ongoing legal challenge to the deployment. The troops are stationed at a reserve center, tasked with protecting federal personnel and property, a move that has been condemned by Illinois Governor JB Pritzker as unconstitutional. President Donald Trump has escalated the conflict by calling for the arrest of both Pritzker and Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson. Simultaneously, in Oregon, a legal battle is unfolding over a similar deployment, with a judge initially blocking the move and the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals now allowing the federalization of Oregon National Guard members while the case continues.
Read More
President Trump has declared his intention to utilize American cities as training grounds for military forces, specifically naming Portland, Seattle, San Francisco, Los Angeles, and New York as targets. This directive has led to an increased federal presence in these cities, including deployments of National Guard troops and heavily armed agents in tactical gear, often operating from unmarked vehicles. Local officials, however, contest Trump’s characterization of these cities as unsafe, with Oregon’s Attorney General suing to block the deployments, citing violations of the Posse Comitatus Act. Legal experts and commentators are raising concerns about constitutional implications, particularly regarding potential racial profiling and the expanding role of federal law enforcement.
Read More
President Trump, in a Truth Social post, directed the Secretary of Defense to deploy troops to Portland, Oregon, escalating his use of military deployments in US cities, despite legal challenges. This follows deployments to Los Angeles, Washington, DC, and Memphis, with local officials condemning the actions as provocative and unauthorized. Trump’s authority to deploy troops is legally dubious, violating the Posse Comitatus Act and facing legal setbacks, as a federal judge has already ruled against a similar deployment to Los Angeles. Civil liberties experts warn that Trump’s actions, including designating “Antifa” as a domestic terrorism organization, could be used to suppress progressive groups and pose a significant threat to American democracy.
Read More
President Trump has directed military troops to Portland, Oregon, at the request of the Secretary of Homeland Security. He stated that these troops are to protect federal facilities from Antifa and other alleged domestic terrorists. Furthermore, Trump authorized the use of “full force” if deemed necessary during the deployment. The announcement was made via a post on Truth Social.
Read More
Officials in Washington, D.C., are suing the Trump administration, alleging the president violated the Constitution and federal law by deploying thousands of National Guard troops into the city without local consent. The lawsuit claims the troops, many from out of state, have been deputized by the U.S. Marshals office and are conducting law enforcement activities. The deployment is argued to undermine the city’s autonomy, erode trust, and harm the local economy. While the White House claims the lawsuit is an attempt to undermine the president’s anti-crime efforts, the lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court, seeks to stop the violations and preserve the District’s sovereignty.
Read More
A federal judge has found that the Trump administration violated the Posse Comitatus Act by deploying military personnel to Los Angeles in response to protests. The judge cited the act’s prohibition against using the military for domestic law enforcement. This ruling comes as the former president hints at deploying troops to Chicago, a move Governor Pritzker has vehemently opposed, threatening legal action if federal troops are sent. The judge’s decision may strengthen the defense of other Democratic states should the government try to interfere.
Read More
The case “GAVIN NEWSOM, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DONALD J. TRUMP, et al., Defendants” revolves around the legality of deploying military forces within California, specifically concerning the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878. The core issue at hand centers on whether then-President Trump’s actions in deploying the National Guard and other military troops into Los Angeles were in violation of the law. The court’s decision, at least initially, appears to side with Newsom and the plaintiffs, issuing an injunction against the deployment. The fundamental concern is that federal military forces were being used for law enforcement duties, which the Posse Comitatus Act generally prohibits.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood