President Donald Trump and his administration have been portraying Portland, Oregon, as a city consumed by lawlessness, a depiction refuted by local residents and elected officials. Trump has made false claims about widespread fires and businesses being rebuilt with plywood, contradicting the reality of peaceful protests and daily life. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem accused Portland officials of covering up the alleged chaos, drawing ridicule and counter-evidence from Senator Ron Wyden and City Council member Angelita Morillo. Residents have also documented the city’s normalcy, challenging the administration’s narrative.
Read More
AP News reports that a U.S. citizen in Portland, Oregon, Frank Miranda, was detained by masked ICE agents on October 2nd. Despite asserting his U.S. citizenship and questioning the agents, Miranda was handcuffed, taken to an ICE building, and held for several hours. His attorney, Michael Fuller, stated this was the first such detention he was aware of in Oregon and has since sent a tort claim notice and requested documentation from the Department of Homeland Security, hoping for a clear explanation for the incident.
Read More
In a recent CNN interview, White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller claimed the U.S. has never tolerated “unlawful riotous assemblies” at federal buildings, drawing immediate criticism. Critics pointed out that the Trump administration had pardoned over 1,500 individuals involved in the January 6, 2021, Capitol riot. This contradiction emerged amidst debates over the deployment of federal agents in Portland, Oregon, where local officials dispute the extent of violence compared to the administration’s claims. A federal judge, in a ruling against the Trump administration’s actions in Portland, agreed that the president had overstepped his authority.
Read More
President Trump claimed an “insurrection” was underway in Portland, Oregon, and suggested he would consider invoking the Insurrection Act to circumvent a judge’s order and deploy military troops. Despite his claims, city data shows homicides are down, and there were no reports of major unrest or violence. The president appears to be attempting to bypass legal challenges and deploy federal forces under the guise of quelling an uprising, echoing comments from other cities. A judge has ruled the administration used false claims of violence to justify the initial deployment of National Guard troops.
Read More
U.S. District Judge Karin Immergut expressed concern over the Trump administration’s attempt to circumvent her order blocking Oregon National Guard troops from Portland by deploying troops from other states like California and Texas. At a late-night hearing, Immergut questioned the legality of this action, specifically asking if bringing in federalized National Guard troops from California contradicted her previous ruling. After hearing arguments, the judge expanded her order to prevent troops from any state from being sent to Portland, citing the relatively small size of the protests and potential violations of Oregon’s self-governance.
Read More
A federal judge’s decision blocked President Trump’s plan to deploy the Oregon National Guard to Portland, sparking a high-profile legal battle over executive power. The ruling, from a Trump-appointed judge, addressed the legality of sending federalized troops into a U.S. city amid protests and the broader constitutional relationships between the White House, Congress, and the states. The state of Oregon and the city of Portland argued that the deployment was unconstitutional. The Justice Department has appealed the ruling, and further court proceedings are scheduled.
Read More
President Trump deployed 300 California National Guard troops to Portland, Oregon, despite a federal court order blocking the move and defying a federal order. This action followed a judge’s ruling that blocked Trump’s attempt to deploy active-duty troops, citing violations of the Constitution and federal law. California Governor Gavin Newsom condemned the deployment as a power grab and vowed to sue in response, as the unrest in Portland continues to escalate at an ICE detention center. Trump’s actions are in response to continued protests and clashes with federal agents that have taken place since June.
Read More
President Donald Trump deployed 300 California National Guard members to Oregon on Sunday, despite a court order that blocked the Pentagon from sending Oregon’s National Guard to Portland. The judge cited that the president’s claims were “untethered to the facts” and rejected the Pentagon’s claim that Portland faced a “danger of rebellion.” Governor Gavin Newsom denounced the move as an abuse of power, vowing to sue, while the White House defended the action, claiming it was to protect federal assets following violent riots. This comes after California previously won a court victory against the Pentagon regarding the use of the National Guard for domestic policing.
Read More
U.S. District Judge Karin J. Immergut issued a temporary restraining order blocking the deployment of 200 National Guard troops to Portland after the state and city sued to prevent the federalization. The judge cited constitutional concerns, arguing the president’s actions undermined Oregon’s sovereignty and blurred the lines between civil and military federal power, granting a temporary restraining order, which could be extended, based on a likelihood of success on the merits. The ruling stems from a memo ordering the National Guard’s federalization and deployment, which was also opposed by the Oregon governor, who stated there was no insurrection or threat warranting the troops. The Trump administration has appealed the ruling, which followed a similar court decision in California against the use of the National Guard, and the president has indicated interest in deploying troops to other cities as well.
Read More
White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller condemned a recent ruling that halted President Trump’s deployment of National Guard soldiers to Portland, Oregon. Miller asserted the President’s authority as commander-in-chief, claiming local law enforcement failed to protect ICE officers from “terrorist assault.” U.S. District Judge Karin Immergut, a Trump appointee, ruled against the deployment, stating the President’s decision was “untethered to the facts,” and issued a temporary restraining order. The case is set to continue with a trial date scheduled for October 29th, as the President has deployed soldiers to other Democrat-led cities in recent months.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker