The Trump administration’s recent launch of a “snitch line” designed to report individuals providing healthcare to transgender children is deeply troubling. This initiative, presented as a means to “protect kids,” is instead a blatant attack on the transgender community and the healthcare providers who support them. The very existence of such a hotline sends a chilling message, fostering an environment of fear and suspicion around accessing essential medical care.
This “snitch line” isn’t operating in a vacuum; its creation coincides with an investigation into a major children’s hospital. This raises serious concerns about the administration’s motives and the potential for politically motivated targeting of healthcare institutions that provide affirming care to transgender youth.… Continue reading
The US Internal Revenue Service’s (IRS) plan to rescind Harvard University’s tax-exempt status is a highly controversial move, sparking intense debate and raising serious questions about the potential abuse of power. This action has ignited a firestorm, with many questioning the fairness and legality of targeting a specific institution in this manner. The move feels particularly arbitrary, prompting comparisons to authoritarian regimes that selectively enforce laws against their political opponents.
This potential action is not just about Harvard; it’s about the implications for all non-profit organizations. The concern is that this sets a dangerous precedent, allowing the government to target any entity it deems undesirable, creating a chilling effect on free speech and academic freedom.… Continue reading
Dearborn attorney Amir Makled was detained at Detroit Metro Airport upon returning from a family vacation and questioned about his clients, specifically his representation of a University of Michigan pro-Palestinian protester. CBP denied targeting Makled due to political beliefs, citing national security concerns as the basis for electronic device searches. Makled, however, believes the incident was politically motivated, reflecting a broader trend of the current administration targeting lawyers involved in cases challenging its policies. He refused to surrender his phone but allowed agents to review his contact list.
Read More
Acting U.S. Attorney Ed Martin launched “Operation Whirlwind,” investigating alleged threats against Supreme Court justices and DOGE employees. The inquiry focuses on statements by Senator Schumer, deemed threatening by Martin, and Representative Garcia, whose comments are similarly under scrutiny. Martin’s memo, which deviates from Justice Department protocol, alleges these statements constitute threats, prompting investigations. Garcia’s office refutes the accusations, characterizing the inquiry as an attempt to silence opposition to Musk and Trump.
Read More
A website, “DEI Watch List,” published the personal information of federal health workers, primarily Black employees involved in diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives, labeling them as “targets.” The site, linked in private group chats and social media, lists alleged “offenses” such as political donations and pronoun usage in bios, sparking fear and alarm among employees. This action, attributed to the conservative American Accountability Foundation, is viewed as a form of intimidation and harassment, with calls for law enforcement investigation. The incident follows recent threatening memos from HHS directing the termination of DEI-related activities and the reporting of non-compliant colleagues, further escalating anxieties within federal health agencies.
Read More
An Inspector General report revealed that the Trump Justice Department secretly obtained phone and text records from 43 congressional staffers and two members of Congress during leak investigations, exceeding previously reported scope. While the DOJ claimed no political motivation, the report criticizes the department’s disregard for separation of powers by targeting individuals solely due to their lawful access to classified information. The investigation also uncovered violations of DOJ policy regarding the secret acquisition of reporters’ records from major news outlets, including a failure to consult the appropriate review committee. These actions, which did not lead to charges, raise concerns about potential chilling effects on congressional oversight and the erosion of checks and balances.
Read More
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker