In response to a newly released letter allegedly sent by Donald Trump to Jeffrey Epstein, multiple Republican lawmakers expressed skepticism and declined to engage with the document. While Congressman Eric Burlison initially expressed a desire to see the letter, he quickly backtracked when presented with the opportunity. Other prominent Republicans, including James Comer and Jim Jordan, stated their trust in Trump’s denial of the letter’s authenticity, with some suggesting the document was falsified. Despite this, the White House proposed reviewing the document, while a professional graphologist stated the signature belonged to Trump.
Read More
House Democrat Dave Min, after reviewing government files on Jeffrey Epstein, believes there are grounds to suspect President Donald Trump’s involvement in wrongdoing, despite disclaimers to the contrary. Min cited numerous connections, including allegations made by a 14-year-old, and the frequent mention of Trump’s name in the documents. He emphasized the need to uncover the truth and called for the release of the unredacted Epstein files, while the White House denies any wrongdoing. The case is further complicated by a birthday letter, allegedly from Trump to Epstein, and a fake check referencing a woman, which were also revealed.
Read More
The emergence of Donald Trump’s alleged birthday letter to Jeffrey Epstein, featuring a crude illustration and signature, has created a setback for Vice President J.D. Vance, who initially dismissed the story as “complete and utter bulls–t” and questioned its authenticity. The House Oversight Committee has received a copy of the letter, which Trump denies writing and has resulted in a $10 billion lawsuit against the Wall Street Journal. Despite the letter’s release, Vance has not retracted his previous statements and has continued to attack Democrats, even after Democratic Congressman Ro Khanna called on Vance to take back his remarks.
Read More
The House Oversight Committee released a document featuring a joke about Jeffrey Epstein allegedly “selling” a woman to Donald Trump for $22,500. The image, originating from Epstein’s 2003 birthday book, includes a novelty check purportedly signed by “DJTRUMP” and a handwritten note. The note, apparently from Joel Pashcow, refers to Epstein’s skills with “money + women.” The White House denies the authenticity of Trump’s alleged signature and any involvement in the matter.
Read More
Trump and Johnson likely doomed in effort to stop Epstein files vote. It’s a sentiment echoing through the digital airwaves, and it’s hard not to feel the weight of it. The release of the Epstein files, the names, the details – it’s all a pressure cooker, isn’t it? The whispers are everywhere; the “I told you so’s” ready to be unleashed. The thought that this might actually be it, that this could be the thing to finally shift the tectonic plates of political loyalty, is both exhilarating and exhausting.
They can’t seem to get their stories straight, those defending Trump. It’s a predictable cycle.… Continue reading
The White House vehemently denies the authenticity of a birthday card signature published by the Wall Street Journal, claiming it is a fabrication. Officials like Karoline Leavitt and Taylor Budowich have asserted that the signature does not belong to former President Trump. However, despite these denials, various examples of Trump’s signatures show a significant resemblance to the one in question, suggesting his signature style may have evolved over time and varies based on the context.
Read More
Reps. Thomas Massie and Ro Khanna are optimistic about forcing the Justice Department to release all unredacted files related to Jeffrey Epstein. They claim to have enough votes to compel a House vote on the matter, despite potential opposition in the Senate and concerns about the Justice Department scrubbing information. Khanna noted that the files have already been seen by government officials and Epstein accusers’ lawyers, making it more difficult to sanitize them. The push for release comes after the Justice Department stated it had not uncovered a list of Epstein’s clients, which sparked political debate.
Read More
The story of the DOJ deputy chief, Joseph Schnitt, and the alleged plan to redact every Republican from the Epstein client list is, to put it mildly, a bombshell. The core of the issue is this: a high-ranking official, caught on tape, seemingly admitting to a politically motivated cover-up within the Department of Justice. The claim, captured by a far-right media outlet, is that the government intends to scrub the list clean of any names associated with the Republican party, leaving only those linked to Democrats. The immediate reaction is one of outrage and disgust, and, frankly, it’s understandable.
The implications of such an action are staggering.… Continue reading
On Wednesday, September 3rd, several victims of Jeffrey Epstein were scheduled to speak at a Capitol press conference organized by Representatives Ro Khanna and Thomas Massie. The press conference, which featured ten women, aimed to demand the release of all Epstein files for full closure. This event followed the House Oversight Committee’s release of 33,000 Epstein documents, though some members claim crucial information is still being withheld by the Department of Justice. The press conference was set to begin at 10:30 a.m. ET at the House Triangle just outside of the House wing of the Capitol building.
Read More
As Congress prepares to reconvene, the issue of Jeffrey Epstein’s files is resurfacing, with Democrats eager to re-examine the scandal. Rep. Ro Khanna and Rep. Thomas Massie plan to introduce a vote to force the Justice Department to release all investigation documents. Republicans may be reluctant to vote against transparency, potentially causing division within the party. Additionally, the House Oversight Committee is seeking further information, including a subpoena to Epstein’s estate and a transcribed interview with Alex Acosta, while also considering testimony from Ghislaine Maxwell.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood