Harvard University, a prestigious institution with a massive endowment, found itself facing a $2.2 billion funding freeze after openly defying the Trump administration. This drastic measure, implemented by a government seemingly intent on punishing dissent, highlights a dangerous trend of targeting critical voices and institutions. The sheer scale of the funding cut is staggering, raising serious questions about the implications for research and the overall academic landscape.
This wasn’t just a small setback; it represented a significant blow to the university’s research capabilities. The frozen funds weren’t for general operating expenses; they supported crucial research projects deemed to be of high scientific merit and societal benefit.… Continue reading
President Trump ordered federal agencies to revoke the security clearances of and investigate former officials Christopher Krebs and Miles Taylor. Krebs, who publicly refuted Trump’s claims of election fraud, was labeled a “significant bad-faith actor” in a memorandum. Taylor, who anonymously criticized Trump’s conduct in a memoir, was accused of stoking dissension. These actions followed Krebs’s dismissal and Taylor’s outspoken criticism of the Trump administration. The move has drawn condemnation from Democrats as an attack on dissent and a step toward authoritarianism.
Read More
Following a court order, the Trump administration was found to have withheld FEMA funds from at least 19 states with Democratic attorneys general, despite Congressional appropriation. This withholding, evidenced by significant unmet funding requests (e.g., $120 million for Oregon, $6 million for Hawaii), directly violated the court’s mandate. The administration’s claim of a new review process was rejected, as the funds had been blocked since February, seemingly in compliance with a Trump executive order targeting “sanctuary” states. This action constitutes a clear breach of the court order.
Read More
President Trump dismissed the Senate bill as a Democratic tactic to highlight Republican dissent, asserting it lacked House support and his signature. He criticized unnamed senators for inaction against fentanyl, attributing their perceived failures to “Trump Derangement Syndrome.” Trump urged constituents in Kentucky, Alaska, and Maine to pressure these senators, whom he labeled disloyal to the Republican Party and its leadership. The statement concluded with a familiar appeal to his base, urging them to “MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!”
Read More
Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard revoked security clearances for numerous individuals, including former Biden administration officials and those involved in investigations of President Trump. This action targeted individuals perceived as having “weaponized” the legal system against Trump, such as lawyers involved in cases against him and those who labeled Hunter Biden laptop information as “disinformation”. The revocations, part of a broader campaign initiated after Trump’s inauguration, also affected former President Biden, who will no longer receive the President’s Daily Brief. Several targeted individuals, including attorney Mark Zaid, have questioned the due process involved in these revocations.
Read More
Trump revoking the security clearances of Biden, Harris, Clinton, and others, described as his “enemies,” is a move sparking significant controversy. The sheer number of individuals targeted—a list extending beyond just the highest-profile names—highlights the broad sweep of this action. The decision is perceived by many as an act of political retribution, a vindictive attempt to settle scores rather than a measure based on legitimate security concerns.
This action is viewed by many as incredibly petty and childish. The time and energy dedicated to this undertaking, rather than focusing on other pressing matters, are seen as a profound waste. The underlying motivation appears to stem from a desire for revenge, fueling outrage among those who see it as further evidence of a deeply flawed character.… Continue reading
This page uses Google AMP technology for a lightweight mobile experience. Essential data is stored on your device to enable functionality, and consent is required for optional data collection. This optional data allows for personalized advertising outside the UK. Rejecting data collection prevents personalized ads, though general advertising will remain. Preferences can be modified at any time via the footer.
Read More
President Trump issued a memo revoking the security clearances of numerous political opponents, including former Vice President Kamala Harris, Hillary Clinton, and President Joe Biden. The memo cited a lack of national interest in these individuals accessing classified information, impacting their past access based on previous government roles. This action also targeted Republicans who investigated the January 6th insurrection and several lawyers who have pursued legal actions against Trump. The directive extends to family members and involves rescinding access to classified briefings and potentially other forms of access.
Read More
Trump revoking Secret Service protection for Hunter and Ashley Biden is a move that has sparked intense reactions, ranging from outrage to cynical amusement. The timing, coming seemingly in response to a reporter’s question about Hunter Biden’s security detail, suggests a highly reactive and perhaps vindictive motivation. It feels less like a carefully considered policy decision and more like an impulsive act fueled by personal animosity.
The stark contrast between Trump’s own post-presidency extension of Secret Service protection for his family members – a move that cost significant taxpayer funds and involved considerable logistical arrangements – and this abrupt withdrawal of protection for the Biden children underscores the perceived hypocrisy.… Continue reading
Following a Justice Department demand, the FBI submitted details on over 5,000 employees involved in January 6th riot investigations, excluding names but including IDs and job titles. This action prompted a lawsuit from several FBI employees alleging constitutional and privacy violations, claiming the data request is retaliatory and intended to intimidate. The request came amidst the firing of eight senior FBI officials and follows the appointment of Elon Musk’s team to the Department of Government Efficiency, raising concerns of a broader purge of personnel involved in Trump-related probes. The FBI Agents Association is urging members not to resign, while top officials are actively defending their teams against the perceived political retribution.
Read More
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker