Widespread “No Kings” protests erupted across major US cities, coordinated to oppose President Trump’s military parade in Washington D.C. These demonstrations, numbering nearly 100,000 in Philadelphia alone, followed politically motivated shootings of Democratic politicians in Minnesota. While largely peaceful, the Los Angeles protest saw clashes with law enforcement, resulting in the use of tear gas after protesters threw projectiles. Motivations ranged from opposition to Trump’s immigration policies and deployment of the National Guard to concerns about presidential overreach and attacks on democratic norms.
Read More
Millions participated in nationwide “No Kings” protests against the Trump administration’s actions, including the deployment of troops to quell other demonstrations. These largely peaceful protests, occurring in all 50 states and internationally, drew hundreds of thousands in major cities and significant numbers in smaller towns. While some protests resulted in unlawful assembly declarations and clashes with law enforcement, many thousands more demonstrated peacefully, even in the face of political violence and credible threats. The scale of these protests, exceeding previous demonstrations against the administration, underscores the growing opposition to Trump’s policies.
Read More
On June 14, 2025, millions participated in the “No Kings” protests across the U.S. and internationally, exceeding expectations with demonstrations in over 2,100 locations. The widespread rallies aimed to reject authoritarianism, defend democratic principles, and oppose perceived abuses of power by the Trump administration. Protests featured diverse displays, from large crowds to symbolic representations, highlighting the scale and breadth of the demonstrations. The ACLU framed the movement as a defense of democratic rights and liberties.
Read More
President Trump’s lavish birthday parade, ostensibly celebrating the U.S. Army’s 250th anniversary, featured a two-and-a-half-mile procession of troops representing various American military conflicts, along with tanks, robot dogs, and aerial displays. The event, described by some officials as “Donald Trump’s birthday parade,” included speeches by Trump and other officials, as well as musical performances. Despite its reported $45 million cost, the parade drew a smaller-than-expected crowd, contrasting sharply with widespread “No Kings” Day protests across the nation. The event was heavily sponsored by corporations, including defense contractors and cryptocurrency exchanges.
Read More
Widespread “No Kings” protests, sparked by President Trump’s immigration policies, overshadowed his 79th birthday military parade. An estimated 50,000 to 80,000 people participated in demonstrations across the nation, utilizing creative displays like a “Baby Trump” balloon and signs denouncing authoritarianism. The protests, coinciding with Trump’s $45 million parade, garnered significant online attention from celebrities and political figures. Despite online opposition, the movement emphasized nonviolent action and a commitment to democratic principles.
Read More
Millions are expected to participate in nationwide “No Kings” protests on June 14th, opposing President Trump’s authoritarianism and planned military parade. These demonstrations, organized by a broad coalition including Indivisible and the ACLU, are planned for approximately 2,000 locations and aim to counter the administration’s actions, including its militarization of cities and cuts to social programs. Participants are encouraged to utilize peaceful, non-violent tactics, and some are carrying American flags to symbolize their defense of democratic ideals. The protests draw parallels to early American history, highlighting a fight against authoritarianism then and now.
Read More
The “No Kings” protest, planned for Saturday, anticipates millions of participants at nearly 2,000 locations nationwide, coinciding with Trump’s military parade and birthday. Fueled by recent events, including the deployment of troops to quell protests in Los Angeles, the demonstrations will target Trump’s actions regarding courts, deportations, civil rights, and government services. The decentralized nature of the protests, notably excluding Washington D.C., aims to showcase widespread opposition and avoid concentrating counter-protests. Organizers expect participation to surpass previous large-scale demonstrations, despite Trump’s threats. The protests are framed as a crucial step in building sustained resistance against what many perceive as increasingly authoritarian actions.
Read More
Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem’s Los Angeles press conference was disrupted when Senator Alex Padilla was forcibly removed and briefly handcuffed after attempting to question Noem about recent ICE raids and the resulting protests. This incident, following other controversial arrests, sparked widespread outrage among Democrats, who called for Noem’s resignation, while Republicans defended Noem and criticized Padilla’s actions. The event, occurring amidst significant unrest and a heavy national guard presence, further fueled existing political divisions. The White House issued strong rebuttals to the Democratic criticism.
Read More
Stephen Miller orchestrated ICE raids in Los Angeles, intentionally provoking protests to justify a militarized response. Senator Tom Cotton, echoing his 2020 op-ed, advocates for using the US military against American protestors, despite the LAPD reporting peaceful demonstrations. This action represents a broader MAGA Republican strategy to suppress dissent through the illegal deployment of federal forces, falsely portraying peaceful protests as violent riots. Cotton’s rhetoric, amplified by the Wall Street Journal, aims to normalize the use of military force against citizens exercising their First Amendment rights. The situation highlights a dangerous escalation of authoritarian tactics and a blatant disregard for civil liberties.
Read More
Following the Secretary of Defense’s threat to deploy active-duty Marines to quell protests in Los Angeles against immigration policies, several prominent Republicans voiced support. House Speaker Mike Johnson justified the potential use of Marines as a necessary measure to maintain order, citing Governor Newsom’s perceived inaction. This deployment would mark the first use of active-duty troops to suppress domestic unrest since 1992, raising concerns about potential legal violations of the Posse Comitatus Act, despite the administration’s reliance on Title 10 of the U.S. Code. Republican Senators Lankford and Mullin criticized protesters, despite actions like displaying Mexican flags being protected speech.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker