HuffPost remains committed to delivering unbiased, free news in a climate of increasing political influence and paywalled content. Unlike many news outlets, HuffPost refuses to compromise its journalistic integrity. Support from readers is crucial to maintaining this commitment and ensuring continued access to ad-free content for qualifying contributors. Contributions directly enable HuffPost’s mission to provide fair and fearless reporting during this pivotal time.
Read More
Stephen Miller, Deputy White House Chief of Staff, vehemently defended the Trump administration’s refusal to repatriate Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Salvadoran man mistakenly deported despite a Supreme Court order mandating his return. Miller’s aggressive Fox News interview contradicted the administration’s own acknowledgment of the wrongful deportation, claiming bringing Garcia back would constitute kidnapping and violate El Salvador’s sovereignty. This defiance follows a Sunday legal filing arguing against active repatriation, and El Salvador’s President Bukele’s refusal to release Garcia. Miller’s outburst, characterized by interruptions and accusations of media distortion, exemplifies a pattern of confrontational on-air behavior.
Read More
Following comments made to reporters, the Trump administration is considering deportation for U.S. citizens convicted of violent crimes. This policy proposal targets individuals deemed “really bad people,” a description lacking specific legal parameters. The legality and practicality of such a measure remain highly contentious given existing constitutional protections for citizens. Further details regarding the criteria for selection and the legal basis for deportation are pending.
Read More
The New York Times’ assertion that the courts won’t stop Trump and his ilk is a chilling reflection of a deeply unsettling reality. It’s a statement that resonates with a growing sense of powerlessness, a feeling that the established mechanisms of accountability are failing us.
This isn’t merely a partisan concern; it speaks to a fundamental erosion of trust in institutions. The perception that the legal system is rigged, that justice is selectively applied, is a corrosive force that threatens the very fabric of democracy. It’s a belief fueled by a perceived double standard, where seemingly minor transgressions by ordinary citizens lead to harsh consequences, while egregious actions by the powerful go largely unpunished.… Continue reading
Concluding Friday’s briefing, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt fielded a question from Cara Castronuova of Lindell TV, inquiring about President Trump’s health and fitness plan following his annual physical. Castronuova’s inquiry, praising Trump’s improved health, exemplifies the administration’s shift towards prioritizing “new media” voices, often loyal to the president. This follows recent actions by the administration to exert greater control over White House press access and coverage. Leavitt confirmed the president’s good health and promised to release the results of his medical exam.
Read More
Most in new poll now view Trump unfavorably. This shift in public opinion is significant, reflecting a growing dissatisfaction with his actions and policies. The reasons behind this change are multifaceted and likely stem from a convergence of factors impacting the American populace.
Most in new poll now view Trump unfavorably, and this seems to be impacting even those who previously supported him. The economic climate is undeniably playing a role, with rising inflation and potential market instability creating anxieties. Tariffs, for example, are likely contributing to higher prices, leading to dissatisfaction among consumers who are feeling the pinch.
Most in new poll now view Trump unfavorably, a trend that many find unsurprising given his history of controversial statements and actions.… Continue reading
Representative Jasmine Crockett argues that President Trump’s escalating trade war with China, marked by soaring prices and alleged abuse of emergency powers, demonstrates his unfitness for office. She contrasts this with the criticism levied against President Biden, highlighting the economic stability enjoyed under the previous administration. Crockett contends that the lack of public questioning regarding Trump’s mental fitness is alarming and suggests voters have exhibited a concerning level of amnesia regarding his first term. Despite recent Democratic electoral successes, she believes significantly better results should have been achieved given the current administration’s perceived incompetence.
Read More
Recent polling data from Quinnipiac and The Economist/YouGov indicates a slight decline in President Trump’s approval rating among Republicans, ranging from 2 to 5 percentage points depending on the poll. This decrease follows the announcement of his “Liberation Day” tariffs, which initially shook financial markets and prompted a partial tariff pause. While his approval remains high, the dip suggests potential vulnerability ahead of the 2026 midterms and could embolden rival voices within the Republican party. The decline is particularly noticeable in approval of his economic policies.
Read More
Recent polling data reveals a significant drop in President Trump’s approval rating, now hovering around 41-47 percent across multiple surveys. This decline, impacting his overall job performance and particularly his handling of the economy, follows the implementation of controversial tariffs. The economic fallout from these tariffs, including market volatility and public anxieties, appears to be the primary driver of this decrease in support. Trump’s approval is currently lower than his first term and significantly lower than Biden’s at a comparable point in his presidency.
Read More
Trump is being sued by a Democrat he removed from a US civil rights agency. This legal battle, unfolding against a backdrop of already intense political polarization, adds another layer of complexity to the ongoing discussions about power, accountability, and the very nature of political appointments.
The lawsuit itself is a direct consequence of Trump’s actions during his presidency. He wielded considerable power in appointing and removing officials, a power inherent in the executive branch. However, the legal challenge suggests that the manner in which he exercised this power in this specific case may have violated legal norms or exceeded permissible boundaries.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood