The narrative of Elon Musk’s departure from his advisory role with the Trump administration is misleading. His departure stems from the 130-day limit on his “special government employee” status and the subsequent required financial disclosures, not a genuine severing of ties. Trump, Vance, and Musk himself have indicated his continued involvement. This convenient framing benefits various political factions, obscuring far more significant issues such as the Trump administration’s escalating human rights abuses and rampant corruption.
Read More
Elon Musk’s erratic behavior, including bizarre public appearances and impulsive business decisions, may be linked to substance abuse. This behavior is concerning given his immense wealth and influence, particularly his impact on political processes and the lives of his employees. His actions range from capricious firings to questionable political interference. The combination of his drug use and powerful position raises serious questions about his fitness for leadership.
Read More
Despite Elon Musk’s announced reduction in his Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) involvement, his influence remains substantial. At least 46 of DOGE’s 110 personnel have direct financial or professional ties to Musk, many holding key positions and exhibiting unwavering loyalty. This deep network of connections, coupled with Musk’s extensive influence within the Trump administration, renders his purported withdrawal largely symbolic. Ultimately, Musk’s continued sway over DOGE officials, stemming from both financial dependence and fear of retaliation, ensures his policies will continue to shape government action.
Read More
The Atlantic published a critical profile detailing Elon Musk’s waning influence within the Trump administration, citing a heated White House confrontation and escalating frustrations from administration officials. Musk responded aggressively on X, dismissing the article and its author, and mocking the publication’s owner. The article attributes Musk’s diminished role to a combination of failed political endorsements, unpopularity, and his abrasive management style. Despite his planned departure, the White House affirmed its commitment to continuing Musk’s cost-cutting initiatives.
Read More
This article is protected by copyright and all rights are reserved by Fortune Media IP Limited. Use of this site is governed by terms of use and privacy policies. The FORTUNE trademark is registered, and the site may contain affiliate links. Finally, offers and information presented are subject to change without prior notification.
Read More
Amazon considered, but ultimately rejected, displaying tariff charges on its discount platform, Amazon Haul, a move intended to compete with Temu and Shein. This decision followed a report suggesting Amazon would show tariff costs, prompting strong White House condemnation and a phone call from President Trump to Jeff Bezos. No changes were implemented on Amazon’s main site. The episode highlights the growing consumer visibility of tariff-related price increases in online retail.
Read More
Unexpectedly sweeping tariffs implemented by President Trump, despite prior assurances from advisors like Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, have sparked a significant backlash. Concerns voiced by prominent figures such as investor Joe Lonsdale highlight the detrimental impact on American industries, particularly manufacturing, due to flawed tariff implementation. This has led to considerable pressure on administration officials, including Vice President Vance and Elon Musk, to advocate for policy adjustments. The negative economic consequences are already evident, with Tesla’s stock price plummeting over 38% this year, reflecting broader market anxieties.
Read More
Governor Tim Walz jocularly suggested the DNC hire Elon Musk to assist in all upcoming races, attributing Musk’s involvement in the Wisconsin election to a decisive victory. The governor’s comment highlights the perceived impact of Musk’s actions on election outcomes. This humorous remark underscores the significant influence of high-profile figures on political campaigns. Walz’s statement implies a belief that leveraging such influence could guarantee future electoral success for the Democrats.
Read More
Despite Elon Musk’s record-breaking $21 million investment and dramatic pronouncements framing the Wisconsin Supreme Court race as crucial to “the fate of Western civilization,” his chosen candidate lost to liberal appellate Judge Susan Crawford. Musk subsequently downplayed the defeat, emphasizing the passage of a voter ID amendment as the election’s most significant outcome, a claim echoed by President Trump. However, Wisconsin already had voter ID laws, and the amendment merely enshrined them constitutionally. The race’s actual consequence, as Musk himself acknowledged, lies in the upcoming redrawing of Wisconsin’s congressional districts, where a liberal majority on the court could impact future Republican control of the House.
Read More
HuffPost remains committed to delivering unbiased, free news in a climate of political influence and paywalled content. The platform is requesting reader support to maintain this commitment and ensure continued operation. Contributions enable HuffPost to resist pressure and provide ad-free access for qualifying supporters. This funding is crucial to sustaining fearless journalism at a critical juncture.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker