Congressman Cohen’s statement highlights the lack of checks on presidential clemency power, citing President Biden’s pardon of his son as a case in point. He argues that Hunter Biden’s prosecution was politically motivated and that the pardon, while understandable given the father-son relationship, raises concerns about potential abuse. To address this, Congressman Cohen advocates for a constitutional amendment restricting presidential pardons for family members, administration officials, and those acting on the President’s behalf to prevent conflicts of interest and corrupt practices. The amendment would also invalidate pardons issued for corrupt purposes.
Read More
Meghan McCain criticized President Biden’s pardon of his son, Hunter Biden, on social media, arguing it demonstrated that the president’s family is above the law. This sparked a backlash from commenters who pointed out McCain’s own career benefited from her father’s political prominence. Hunter Biden’s pardon covers tax and drug charges, with President Biden citing political bias in the prosecution. The pardon, issued days before sentencing, has drawn widespread Republican criticism.
Read More
President Biden pardoned his son, Hunter, who faced felony charges including tax evasion and gun-related offenses, citing Republican political pressure influencing the legal process. This action drew immediate condemnation from Republicans, who accused the president of abusing his power and undermining justice. In response, Rep. Jasmine Crockett defended the pardon, highlighting the hypocrisy given President-elect Trump’s own history of controversial pardons and numerous ongoing legal battles. Crockett argued that the pardon pales in comparison to Trump’s actions and that Republicans’ outrage is disingenuous. No evidence linking President Biden to Hunter’s alleged crimes has been found.
Read More
Crockett’s challenge to Republicans criticizing Hunter Biden’s pardon – “Take a look in the mirror” – cuts to the heart of the matter. It highlights the glaring hypocrisy embedded in the GOP’s outrage, particularly given the sheer volume of controversial pardons issued during the Trump administration.
The sheer number of pardons granted by Trump for individuals convicted of serious crimes, including those involving violence and potential war crimes, stands in stark contrast to the comparatively less egregious nature of Hunter Biden’s offenses. This disparity fuels the argument that the Republican criticisms are less about justice and more about partisan politics.
The argument implicitly points out the double standard at play; a lack of consistent outrage across administrations creates the impression of selective morality.… Continue reading
The free press faces increasing threats, jeopardizing America’s future. HuffPost, unlike other news organizations succumbing to political pressure, remains committed to unbiased reporting. Continued operation depends on reader support; contributions, even through free account creation, are crucial to maintaining free access to news.
Read More
President Biden’s pardon of his son, Hunter Biden, for federal gun and tax charges, issued days before sentencing, sparked immediate outrage among Congressional Republicans. Many Republicans, including House Oversight Committee Chair James Comer, accused Biden of lying about his intentions and using his power for familial gain, citing the pardon as an admission of guilt. Criticism also came from some Democrats, who expressed concern over the precedent set by the pardon. The pardon encompassed offenses committed between 2014 and 2024, encompassing those prosecuted by Special Counsel David C. Weiss. The decision contradicts Biden’s previous public statements against pardoning his son.
Read More
President Biden pardoned his son, Hunter Biden, for federal gun and tax charges, prompting immediate outrage from Republican lawmakers. Republicans criticized the pardon as a politically motivated move to avoid accountability, citing perceived hypocrisy given past criticisms of the Justice Department. Some Democrats also expressed disapproval, arguing the pardon set a dangerous precedent. Biden defended his decision, asserting Hunter was unfairly targeted due to his familial connection.
Read More
GOP senators facing accusations of sex-related misconduct against Trump’s cabinet picks are finding themselves in a difficult position. The allegations, ranging from inappropriate behavior to serious assault, paint a troubling picture of the administration’s personnel choices. It’s not just the severity of the accusations that creates a problem, but the sheer volume of them that makes it harder for Republican senators to ignore. The constant stream of revelations forces them into a defensive posture, making it increasingly difficult to maintain their usual air of confidence.
This predicament is particularly challenging given the Republican party’s history. They’ve often taken a strong stance against sexual misconduct, yet their current situation demands a response that doesn’t completely contradict their previous rhetoric.… Continue reading
Donald Trump’s history of disrespectful and abusive behavior towards women is irrefutable, encompassing verbal assaults, alleged sexual assault, and documented instances of harassment. This behavior, ranging from demeaning comments to alleged physical attacks, reveals a profound contempt for women’s dignity and equality. His election normalized this misogyny, sending a dangerous message that such behavior is acceptable, thereby jeopardizing the safety and well-being of women and girls. The consequences of electing such a leader extend far beyond individual actions, impacting societal norms and attitudes towards women.
Read More
Mike Johnson’s recently instituted transgender bathroom ban for the U.S. House is sparking widespread outrage and debate. The move, seemingly targeted at a newly elected transgender congresswoman, feels less like a solution to a pressing problem and more like a pointed act of political aggression. Many are questioning the practicality and fairness of such a ban, especially given the limited impact it’s likely to have on the everyday functioning of the House.
This bathroom ban appears to be a highly symbolic action, rather than one driven by practical concerns. The argument that such a ban is necessary for the safety and comfort of cisgender women is widely challenged, with many pointing out that such fears are unfounded and often fueled by harmful stereotypes.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood