Nancy Mace, a Christian Republican politician known for her outspoken opposition to transgender rights, has found herself in the spotlight after a video surfaced showing her kissing another woman. The video, which quickly circulated online, presents a stark contrast to her public persona and has ignited a firestorm of commentary.
The video itself depicts a seemingly informal setting. The scene shows Mace and another woman engaged in a kiss, raising immediate questions about the congruity between her personal life and her staunchly conservative political stances. The context surrounding the kiss is unclear, but the video’s existence undeniably adds a layer of complexity to her public image.… Continue reading
McConnell cries foul over two Democratic judges rescinding their retirements following Trump’s victory, a move he labels as “open partisanship.” This accusation rings particularly hollow given McConnell’s own extensive history of partisan maneuvering, particularly regarding Supreme Court nominations. His outrage feels less like genuine concern for judicial integrity and more like a calculated response to actions that disrupt the power balance he’s carefully cultivated.
The hypocrisy is striking. McConnell’s pronouncements on decorum and norms seem to apply selectively, conveniently ignored when his own actions benefit his party. This blatant double standard fuels the perception of him as a cynical player, prioritizing political gain above any purported commitment to principles.… Continue reading
On *The Daily Show*, Jon Stewart criticized President Biden’s pardon of Hunter Biden, not for the pardon itself, but for the Democrats’ prior use of Biden’s promise *not* to pardon his son as a cornerstone of their “law and order” platform. Stewart argued this created a perception of hypocrisy and undermined public trust in the system. He urged Democrats to utilize legal loopholes and strategies, but to do so for the benefit of all citizens, not just those connected to powerful individuals. This inconsistency, Stewart contended, fuels the belief that the system is rigged.
Read More
President Biden’s pardon of his son, Hunter, drew criticism from Donald Trump’s supporters, who were quick to highlight the hypocrisy given Trump’s own pardoning of his son-in-law’s father, Charles Kushner, in 2020. Kushner, convicted of multiple felonies including witness tampering, received a pardon and was subsequently appointed US Ambassador to France by Trump. Social media users widely pointed out this inconsistency, noting Trump’s extensive history of pardons and the apparent double standard applied to those in power. The debate highlighted concerns about unequal application of justice and the prioritization of political connections over legal consequences.
Read More
Congressman Cohen’s statement highlights the lack of checks on presidential clemency power, citing President Biden’s pardon of his son as a case in point. He argues that Hunter Biden’s prosecution was politically motivated and that the pardon, while understandable given the father-son relationship, raises concerns about potential abuse. To address this, Congressman Cohen advocates for a constitutional amendment restricting presidential pardons for family members, administration officials, and those acting on the President’s behalf to prevent conflicts of interest and corrupt practices. The amendment would also invalidate pardons issued for corrupt purposes.
Read More
Meghan McCain criticized President Biden’s pardon of his son, Hunter Biden, on social media, arguing it demonstrated that the president’s family is above the law. This sparked a backlash from commenters who pointed out McCain’s own career benefited from her father’s political prominence. Hunter Biden’s pardon covers tax and drug charges, with President Biden citing political bias in the prosecution. The pardon, issued days before sentencing, has drawn widespread Republican criticism.
Read More
President Biden pardoned his son, Hunter, who faced felony charges including tax evasion and gun-related offenses, citing Republican political pressure influencing the legal process. This action drew immediate condemnation from Republicans, who accused the president of abusing his power and undermining justice. In response, Rep. Jasmine Crockett defended the pardon, highlighting the hypocrisy given President-elect Trump’s own history of controversial pardons and numerous ongoing legal battles. Crockett argued that the pardon pales in comparison to Trump’s actions and that Republicans’ outrage is disingenuous. No evidence linking President Biden to Hunter’s alleged crimes has been found.
Read More
Crockett’s challenge to Republicans criticizing Hunter Biden’s pardon – “Take a look in the mirror” – cuts to the heart of the matter. It highlights the glaring hypocrisy embedded in the GOP’s outrage, particularly given the sheer volume of controversial pardons issued during the Trump administration.
The sheer number of pardons granted by Trump for individuals convicted of serious crimes, including those involving violence and potential war crimes, stands in stark contrast to the comparatively less egregious nature of Hunter Biden’s offenses. This disparity fuels the argument that the Republican criticisms are less about justice and more about partisan politics.
The argument implicitly points out the double standard at play; a lack of consistent outrage across administrations creates the impression of selective morality.… Continue reading
The free press faces increasing threats, jeopardizing America’s future. HuffPost, unlike other news organizations succumbing to political pressure, remains committed to unbiased reporting. Continued operation depends on reader support; contributions, even through free account creation, are crucial to maintaining free access to news.
Read More
President Biden’s pardon of his son, Hunter Biden, for federal gun and tax charges, issued days before sentencing, sparked immediate outrage among Congressional Republicans. Many Republicans, including House Oversight Committee Chair James Comer, accused Biden of lying about his intentions and using his power for familial gain, citing the pardon as an admission of guilt. Criticism also came from some Democrats, who expressed concern over the precedent set by the pardon. The pardon encompassed offenses committed between 2014 and 2024, encompassing those prosecuted by Special Counsel David C. Weiss. The decision contradicts Biden’s previous public statements against pardoning his son.
Read More
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker