In 2016, then-Fox News contributor Pete Hegseth strongly asserted that U.S. military personnel had a duty to refuse unlawful orders, specifically those that could potentially come from then-candidate Donald Trump. He emphasized that the military would not follow illegal directives, a stance rooted in the understanding that service members could face criminal consequences for executing such commands. However, as Trump’s Secretary of Defense, Hegseth has recently shifted his position, criticizing Democrats for raising similar concerns about unlawful orders. These earlier comments have resurfaced amidst his current criticism of Democrats for encouraging troops to reject illegal orders, a message he now claims undermines the chain of command.
Read More
According to Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, many Republican colleagues privately ridicule Donald Trump but are too afraid to publicly criticize him. Greene stated that these colleagues would mock Trump until he secured the Republican nomination. She believes fear of Trump’s repercussions, like a negative Truth Social post, is a key reason for their public silence. This follows Greene’s own falling out with Trump over issues such as the release of the Epstein files, leading to a public feud and Trump withdrawing his support for her.
Read More
According to outgoing GOP House member Marjorie Taylor Greene, many Republican colleagues privately mocked Donald Trump before the 2024 primary but quickly shifted their support after he secured the nomination. Greene recounted how these same individuals, who once ridiculed Trump and her support for him, began outwardly embracing his “Make America Great Again” platform. She attributes this shift to fear of public criticism from Trump. Greene also detailed receiving threats, initially from the left, but later from the right after disagreeing with Trump’s handling of files related to Jeffrey Epstein.
Read More
Hegseth condemned a video made by the “Seditious Six” as despicable, reckless, and false, stating it undermined military order. He announced the Department is reviewing the statements and actions of Mark Kelly, suggesting the conduct brought discredit upon the armed forces. Kelly responded by pointing out Hegseth had previously agreed with the same sentiments and highlighted the hypocrisy, attributing the change to political loyalty. Ultimately, the central point is that Hegseth’s criticism is inconsistent with his previous statements and appears motivated by allegiance to the current administration.
Read More
Trump: Airspace above Venezuela ‘closed in its entirety’ as tensions grow over drug strikes is a situation that has a lot of people talking, and for good reason. It’s a complex issue with multiple layers, and it’s hard not to see the inconsistencies and potential dangers. Let’s break it down and see if we can make some sense of it all.
The core of the matter seems to be this: Trump’s administration is claiming to be cracking down on drug trafficking by taking military action, which they’re calling “drug strikes,” against Venezuela. Simultaneously, and this is where the eyebrows start to raise, the former President is considering pardoning Juan Orlando Hernández, the former Honduran President, who was convicted of moving massive amounts of cocaine into the United States.… Continue reading
Trump says airspace above and surrounding Venezuela to be closed in its entirety, and the immediate reaction is a mix of disbelief, anger, and concern. Many are questioning the legality and the motives behind such a drastic move, especially given the historical context of the “America First” rhetoric. There’s a palpable sense of betrayal, with accusations that the former president is abandoning his promises and potentially dragging the country into another protracted and costly conflict. The question on everyone’s mind seems to be: why now, and why Venezuela?
The action is seen as a potential “act of war,” or a prelude to one, under US law, drawing attention to the potential implications of armed conflict.… Continue reading
Indiana State Senator to vote ‘No’ on redistricting, citing Trump’s use of a slur on social media is a fascinating case study in political maneuvering and the ever-shifting landscape of modern political allegiances. It presents a scenario where personal offense, seemingly, has become the defining factor in a politician’s decision-making process.
At the core of this situation lies the Indiana State Senator’s intention to vote against redistricting. The stated reason for this, and the one that is generating a lot of buzz, is the recent use of a derogatory slur by former President Donald Trump on social media. This slur, often used as a pejorative against individuals with intellectual disabilities, is particularly sensitive to the Senator because he has a daughter with Down Syndrome.… Continue reading
Senator John Fetterman has faced criticism from both within his party and from constituents following his vote to end the government shutdown. His public support of a union’s labor victory was met with accusations of hypocrisy, as the union criticized his vote for potentially harming healthcare access for many people. Fetterman’s vote to restart federal funding, deviating from the Democratic party line, was seen as a betrayal that paved the way for the shutdown’s end with few concessions for Democrats. The vote is seen as having negative ramifications for many people, especially regarding healthcare.
Read More
The Administration has downplayed the potential damage caused by the dismantling of U.S.A.I.D., a move which has hindered the ability to measure the fallout. However, in Kenya, where U.S.A.I.D. had a significant presence, there is evidence of severe consequences, including reduced resources for programs combating childhood malnutrition. The cutbacks led to a surge in cases and the loss of essential early-detection systems in places like the Kakuma refugee camp. The author notes that despite valid criticisms of U.S.A.I.D., it played a critical role in saving lives and alleviating poverty and dismantling this program won’t improve the situation.
Read More
Data from the Ashley Madison website, as well as AdultFriendFinder and Fling.com, links Republican state Rep. Bryan Posthumus to accounts on these platforms, exposing his personal information. The Ashley Madison data includes his name, address, and credit card, while AdultFriendFinder and Fling.com accounts used his email address and listed his birth date, along with sexual interests. Metro Times independently verified the information through multiple cybersecurity databases, despite his attorney’s denial of the allegations and claims of a politically motivated attack. Posthumus, who has built his political career around “traditional family values,” has faced these accusations while also being involved in other controversies.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood