Sen. John Fetterman demands Trump fire Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, a statement that has sparked quite a reaction. It seems this announcement has generated a mixed bag of opinions, ranging from genuine support to outright skepticism, and everything in between. The core of the issue is clear: Fetterman, a Democratic Senator, is calling for the removal of Noem.
A considerable amount of the discussion focuses on Fetterman’s past actions and how they might relate to his current demand. Several comments directly call out his vote to confirm Noem in the first place, highlighting the seeming inconsistency of now wanting her gone.… Continue reading
Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez criticized Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem for a perceived double standard following the death of Alex Pretti, who was killed by a federal agent at a protest. Ocasio-Cortez pointed out that Noem’s stance, which suggested Pretti’s presence at the protest with a legal firearm justified his death, contradicted the administration’s support for armed protesters on the right. She argued this demonstrated a politically motivated application of justice, with the administration essentially condoning violence based on political affiliation. Ultimately, Ocasio-Cortez warned against the dangerous division the administration is attempting to create.
Read More
In secret recordings, Cruz trashes Trump, Vance, and the underlying sentiment is one of utter disdain, not just for the individuals but for the entire political game. The core revelation here is that Ted Cruz, a prominent Republican figure, reportedly expressed incredibly harsh criticisms of both Donald Trump and J.D. Vance in private, a stark contrast to his public persona. The details of these private rebukes paint a picture of a man who sees through the facade but lacks the courage to confront it directly.
We hear of Cruz’s assessment of Trump, which is scathing. He reportedly views Trump as a pathological liar, a narcissist of unprecedented proportions, and someone utterly devoid of morals.… Continue reading
Recent policy proposals from a former president showcase a concerning trend of government overreach. These initiatives, including capping credit card interest rates, banning institutional investors from buying homes, and expanding government interference in private companies, echo the Democratic platform. Such policies, which also include government bailouts and stimulus checks, are presented as easy-button solutions that ultimately undermine free markets and economic growth. This shift towards a larger role for the government, both economically and in terms of corporate control, indicates a troubling trend away from limited government principles.
Read More
Regarding the events of January 6th, when asked if officers were justified in using lethal force against those causing them harm, Noem stated that each situation would depend on the specifics, and officers had the authority to arrest individuals using weapons or physically harming them. Tapper countered, noting that Trump had pardoned all the rioters involved in the incident.
Read More
The tendency of powerful individuals to embrace correct positions only after they relinquish power is a recurring phenomenon, often appearing inauthentic and primarily aimed at legacy repair. This pattern, exemplified by figures like Mitt Romney, sees politicians endorsing policies they once opposed or ignored while in office. These reversals, while seemingly positive, often lack genuine courage and instead reward those who previously perpetuated harmful systems, undermining the efforts of those who advocated for change while in power. Ultimately, this behavior removes a crucial deterrent against abusing power, as it allows individuals to later be celebrated for positions they previously exploited. This ultimately makes their actions a PR strategy at best.
Read More
In 2016, then-Fox News contributor Pete Hegseth strongly asserted that U.S. military personnel had a duty to refuse unlawful orders, specifically those that could potentially come from then-candidate Donald Trump. He emphasized that the military would not follow illegal directives, a stance rooted in the understanding that service members could face criminal consequences for executing such commands. However, as Trump’s Secretary of Defense, Hegseth has recently shifted his position, criticizing Democrats for raising similar concerns about unlawful orders. These earlier comments have resurfaced amidst his current criticism of Democrats for encouraging troops to reject illegal orders, a message he now claims undermines the chain of command.
Read More
According to Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, many Republican colleagues privately ridicule Donald Trump but are too afraid to publicly criticize him. Greene stated that these colleagues would mock Trump until he secured the Republican nomination. She believes fear of Trump’s repercussions, like a negative Truth Social post, is a key reason for their public silence. This follows Greene’s own falling out with Trump over issues such as the release of the Epstein files, leading to a public feud and Trump withdrawing his support for her.
Read More
According to outgoing GOP House member Marjorie Taylor Greene, many Republican colleagues privately mocked Donald Trump before the 2024 primary but quickly shifted their support after he secured the nomination. Greene recounted how these same individuals, who once ridiculed Trump and her support for him, began outwardly embracing his “Make America Great Again” platform. She attributes this shift to fear of public criticism from Trump. Greene also detailed receiving threats, initially from the left, but later from the right after disagreeing with Trump’s handling of files related to Jeffrey Epstein.
Read More
Hegseth condemned a video made by the “Seditious Six” as despicable, reckless, and false, stating it undermined military order. He announced the Department is reviewing the statements and actions of Mark Kelly, suggesting the conduct brought discredit upon the armed forces. Kelly responded by pointing out Hegseth had previously agreed with the same sentiments and highlighted the hypocrisy, attributing the change to political loyalty. Ultimately, the central point is that Hegseth’s criticism is inconsistent with his previous statements and appears motivated by allegiance to the current administration.
Read More
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker