Booker’s 25-Hour Filibuster: A Stunt That Worked?
Cory Booker’s 25-hour speech was undeniably a calculated move, a strategic performance designed to capture attention and galvanize support. And, judging by the widespread reaction, it worked spectacularly. It wasn’t merely a display of stamina; it was a powerful statement, a meticulously planned act of defiance in the face of what many perceive as a crumbling democracy.
The sheer duration of the speech, surpassing even Strom Thurmond’s infamous filibuster, immediately grabbed headlines. It disrupted the Senate’s normal proceedings, forcing a pause in the relentless confirmation of controversial appointees. This disruption itself served as a potent symbol of resistance, a visual representation of the frustration and anger felt by many.… Continue reading
Matt Underwood