Trump’s unwavering stance on tariffs, even amidst high-profile visits like Netanyahu’s, reveals a perplexing and seemingly arbitrary trade policy. The administration’s consistent refusal to offer concessions, even when countries like Vietnam propose substantial tariff reductions, suggests a strategy detached from traditional negotiation.
This isn’t about striking deals; it feels more like a shakedown. The US offers nothing in return for paying these tariffs, only continued access to the American market – and the looming threat of future increases. There’s no give-and-take, no compromise; it’s pure extortion.
The lack of any discernible end goal further compounds the mystery. Netanyahu’s visit, seemingly at Trump’s request, didn’t even address the tariff issue, suggesting Israel may not even consider them a major concern.… Continue reading
The European Union is reinstating tariffs on various US goods, totaling up to $13.5 billion in exports, primarily targeting products significant to Republican-leaning states. These duties, ranging from 25% on items like soybeans, steel, and almonds to similar levies on cranberries and orange juice, will be implemented in phases beginning April 15th. The EU’s action follows the suspension of similar tariffs in 2021 and is expected to pass without significant opposition. This strategic targeting leverages obscure customs codes to inflict economic pressure on specific US regions.
Read More
The EU Commission’s proposal of 25% counter-tariffs on select US imports has sparked considerable debate. This move, seemingly targeted at industries located in politically significant “red” states within the US, aims to exert economic pressure on specific voter demographics. The strategy is based on the assumption that Europe possesses alternative suppliers for many of these products, thereby minimizing disruption to its own economy while maximizing impact on the targeted US sectors.
This calculated approach suggests a sophisticated understanding of the political landscape in the US. The EU appears to be engaging in a targeted campaign, focusing its efforts on harming specific segments of the US economy that are aligned with a particular political faction.… Continue reading
In the past month, highly pathogenic avian influenza has impacted nearly 12 million birds, necessitating culling of entire flocks and driving up egg prices. This surge in avian flu cases coincides with a temporary halt in the release of public health communications from US agencies, including a CDC report on the outbreak. The suspension affects crucial information regarding the bird flu’s impact on poultry farms. This delay hinders efforts to address the crisis and could exacerbate the ongoing price increases.
Read More
Biden’s job creation numbers are undeniably impressive, surpassing those achieved during both the Obama and Trump administrations. This surge in job growth represents a significant economic recovery, though the underlying factors are complex and deserve careful consideration.
The sheer scale of the job gains under Biden is striking. It’s a testament to the resilience of the American economy and the effectiveness of certain policies implemented during his presidency. However, simply stating the raw numbers doesn’t tell the whole story; we must examine the context in which these gains occurred.
A significant portion of this job growth can be attributed to the economic rebound following the COVID-19 pandemic.… Continue reading
Despite a strong post-pandemic economy exceeding pre-Covid levels, the Biden administration faced electoral setbacks. This economic success, attributed to “Bidenomics,” involved novel policies resulting in positive economic indicators across the board. Central to Bidenomics was the principle of fair economic distribution, ensuring those contributing to the economy receive a proportional share. The administration’s economic approach, originating from a 2009 conversation between Jared Bernstein and then-Vice President Biden, yielded significant positive results worthy of future study and consideration.
Read More
Running the government like a business would be a disaster because the fundamental goals are diametrically opposed. Businesses prioritize profit maximization for owners and shareholders, often at the expense of worker well-being and long-term sustainability. Governments, on the other hand, should focus on the well-being and happiness of their citizens, even if it means sacrificing short-term financial gains. This difference in core objectives makes direct comparison misleading and dangerous.
The idea of applying business principles to government often serves as a dog whistle for those seeking to shrink government services and redirect public funds towards private interests. This “streamlining” often translates to cuts to essential programs benefiting the majority, while simultaneously enriching the wealthy through tax breaks and deregulation.… Continue reading
The free press faces unprecedented challenges, with many news organizations succumbing to political influence. HuffPost, however, remains committed to independent journalism and will not yield to such pressures. Continued operation depends on reader support; therefore, contributions, even in the form of creating a free account, are crucial to maintaining free access to news. The future of American democracy is inextricably linked to a vibrant and independent press.
Read More
I can’t wrap my head around how anyone could see tariffs as anything but a tax on American consumers. It’s common sense. When prices go up due to tariffs, it’s the American people who end up paying the difference. Companies like Walmart or Publix will simply raise their prices to maintain their profit margins, and who has to foot the bill? The middle and lower class citizens who are already struggling to make ends meet.
The fact that Trump and Vance are pushing this narrative that tariffs are somehow good for the economy is laughable. It’s not a legitimate policy idea up for debate among economists.… Continue reading
Goldman Sachs predicts a brighter economic future if Democrats sweep the White House and Congress. This news comes as no surprise, considering historical data that clearly demonstrates the economic success under Democratic leadership. The potential for stronger GDP growth and job creation is a promising prospect if Vice President Kamala Harris and the Democrats secure control of both chambers of Congress.
The economic implications of a Republican victory, especially under the leadership of Donald Trump, have been cautioned against by Goldman Sachs economists. The impact of tariff imposition and tighter immigration policies would outweigh any potential growth from maintaining tax cuts.… Continue reading
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker