On October 18th, “No Kings” protests are planned nationwide, aiming to condemn Donald Trump’s actions and advocate for democracy. Despite these peaceful gatherings, Trump and his allies are attempting to portray the protesters as violent extremists, employing inflammatory rhetoric. Republicans, such as Mike Johnson and Tom Emmer, are labeling dissent as terrorism and equating criticism with hate. The article emphasizes that the participants are a diverse group of activists, not terrorists, and encourages readers to observe the protests firsthand rather than accepting misleading characterizations.
Read More
In a display of defiance, hundreds of Russians gathered in St. Petersburg on Tuesday to sing a song critical of President Putin and the war in Ukraine. The song, “Cooperative Swan Lake,” originally written by exiled pro-Ukrainian rapper Noize MC (Ivan Alexeyev), had been outlawed in May 2025 after a St. Petersburg court deemed it “extremist.” Viral social media videos captured the crowd and street musicians performing the song, which calls for Putin’s removal.
Read More
In St. Petersburg, a public demonstration against Putin’s regime occurred on October 13, with a crowd singing banned anti-war lyrics at Kazanskaya Square. The song, “Co-operative Swan Lake” by pro-Ukrainian rapper Noize MC, became an anti-war anthem, reflecting discontent among Russian youth. The performance led to the arrest of an 18-year-old singer, Diana Loginova, while Ukrainian forces escalated their drone campaign, targeting Russian oil infrastructure and driving up gasoline prices. Ukraine is now seeking long-range missiles, like the Tomahawk, from the United States, prompting varied responses from Washington and increasing tensions with Russia.
Read More
Mamdani slams Trump arrest threat: “If you speak up, they will come for you” has, at its core, a chilling message about the potential for political retribution and the suppression of dissent. The situation, as it unfolds, paints a picture of a political climate where expressing opposition to certain policies can result in serious consequences, even arrest. This goes beyond the typical rough and tumble of political discourse, veering into territory that directly threatens fundamental freedoms.
Trump’s statement regarding Zohran Mamdani, the New York City mayoral candidate, sends a clear message. If Mamdani attempts to prevent ICE agents from carrying out their operations, he will face arrest.… Continue reading
Three months into President Trump’s second term, Senator Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) openly acknowledged widespread fear among lawmakers, citing real instances of retaliation against dissenters. She highlighted her own anxieties about speaking out, despite facing considerable pressure and threats, including from Trump himself, who actively campaigned against her reelection. Murkowski urged continued resistance against the administration’s actions, emphasizing the importance of sustained engagement despite potential consequences. She stressed the need for Congress to proactively address the situation, rather than deferring responsibility.
Read More
Nearly a thousand people rallied in Lexington, Kentucky, to protest the Trump administration’s budget cuts. This significant demonstration underscores the palpable frustration felt by many concerning the economic and social ramifications of these policies.
The rally, held in a prominent location downtown, attracted a considerable crowd, demonstrating a level of community engagement that is noteworthy given the political leanings of the state as a whole. The size of the protest hints at a significant portion of the population deeply concerned about the potential negative consequences of the cuts.
However, the notable absence of Representative Andy Barr at the protest raises serious questions.… Continue reading
A bill recently introduced in the Minnesota legislature proposes that expressing intense verbal hostility toward President Donald J. Trump constitutes “Trump Derangement Syndrome,” a serious mental illness requiring immediate intervention. This is a truly astonishing proposition, suggesting a chilling precedent for suppressing dissent and freedom of expression.
The very idea that strong negative opinions about a political figure should be classified as a mental disorder is deeply concerning. It smacks of authoritarian regimes that historically used psychiatric diagnoses to silence critics and political opponents. The proposed bill’s authors seemingly fail to grasp the fundamental principles of free speech and the right to express one’s political views, however vehemently.… Continue reading
Recent booing of the American national anthem at a hockey game in Montreal reflects growing Canadian displeasure with U.S. actions. This follows a pattern of expressing dissent through symbolic gestures, as seen in similar incidents, such as Polish fans booing the Russian anthem at Euro 2012. The author argues that this booing isn’t simply unsportsmanlike, but a necessary and relatively harmless way to communicate significant concerns about strained relations. The article suggests that this direct, albeit impolite, method of expressing displeasure is more effective than other avenues. Ultimately, the booing serves as a call for the U.S. to acknowledge and address Canada’s grievances.
Read More
President Trump’s revocation of security clearances from over 50 former intelligence officials is unprecedented in scale and scope, exceeding actions taken by previous administrations. This action, targeting individuals who signed a letter critical of Trump’s claims regarding the 2020 election and John Bolton for his memoir, is viewed by legal experts as a politically motivated attempt to silence dissent. The former officials contend their actions were within their rights as private citizens, while the White House claims the move restores institutional credibility. Critics argue the decision undermines established norms and erodes trust in government institutions.
Read More
As I sit here contemplating the recent events surrounding Trump’s alarming post calling for televised military tribunals for his political enemies, the gravity of the situation weighs heavily on my mind. The idea that such authoritarian tendencies could be openly proposed, shared, and then swiftly deleted is indicative of a dangerous trajectory in our political landscape. The veiled threats, the allusions to violent retribution, all underscore a chilling reality that is unfolding before our very eyes.
The notion of using military tribunals on civilian, political opponents is not only unfounded but also a serious breach of democratic principles. It’s a stark reminder that we are teetering on the edge of a precipice, where the rule of law and civil liberties could be jeopardized in the pursuit of power and control.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood