The idea of a politician declaring they won’t be an “asshole” like a current senator, particularly John Fetterman, certainly sparks conversation. It’s a statement that seems to tap into a desire for a certain kind of political persona, one that’s perhaps less confrontational or less prone to alienating behavior. The sentiment appears to be that while being an “asshole” isn’t necessarily a disqualifier in politics, a different *kind* of “asshole” might be preferable.
There’s a clear undercurrent that suggests Fetterman, in the eyes of some, has crossed a line from being a feisty, working-class advocate to something less palatable. This perception is linked to specific past actions or associations, like a Nazi tattoo or controversial statements, which have led to him being labeled a “traitorous asshole” by some.… Continue reading
President Trump ended an interview with “Meet the Press” host Kristen Welker after she challenged his unsubstantiated claims of election rigging in California. Despite Welker pointing out that ballot counting is a lengthy process, Trump insisted officials were “cheating” and accused the press of dishonesty. He stated he had “had enough” and walked off the set, asserting that a country cannot be great with a dishonest press. Reports indicate that a misreading of voting data in the Los Angeles mayoral race fueled these false narratives.
Read More
It appears there’s a considerable amount of discussion around statements made regarding the initiation of new wars. The central theme is a claim that he never actually promised “no new wars.” This is a significant point of contention, especially given past campaign rhetoric that many recall as being quite definitive on the matter.
The narrative often presented was one of ending conflicts, not perpetuating them. Phrases like “I’m not going to start a war. I’m going to stop wars” and promises to prevent Americans from fighting and dying in “stupid foreign wars that never end” are frequently brought up. These weren’t just passing remarks; they were often highlighted during rallies and speeches, resonating with an audience weary of prolonged military engagements abroad.… Continue reading
Mike Pence’s recent assertion that violent January 6th rioters, particularly those who may have been pardoned by former President Trump, “should never get a dime” strikes a chord, especially considering the context of the day’s events. It’s a sentiment that, while perhaps overdue for some, highlights a stark contrast to the actions and attitudes of others involved in that tumultuous period.
The idea that individuals who participated in the violent storming of the Capitol, threatening public officials and attempting to disrupt the peaceful transfer of power, should receive any financial support, let alone from taxpayers, is frankly preposterous. These were not peaceful protesters; they were individuals engaged in sedition, many of whom expressed outright hostility and a desire for violence.… Continue reading
Texas Democratic state Representative James Talarico has responded thoughtfully to attacks on his masculinity, defining true manhood through service and responsibility rather than aggression. His critics, including prominent political figures, have resorted to childish taunts and insults, falsely suggesting Talarico is weak for not adhering to their narrow, aggressive definition of masculinity. Talarico’s perspective, exemplified by his description of his father’s quiet generosity, highlights humility and doing what is right as hallmarks of genuine strength. This contrasts sharply with the insecure, bullying tactics employed by those who attack him.
Read More
This article argues that critical moments, such as the conflict with Iran, demand public engagement and informed decision-making, not passive acceptance. It emphasizes the vital role of facts, accountability, and fearless reporting in navigating such complex situations, suggesting that history is shaped by active participants rather than those who remain uninvolved. The piece implicitly calls for a rejection of blind trust in favor of a more vigilant and informed citizenry.
Read More
The notion of a former president claiming to have won all 50 states, even acknowledging the inclusion of Canada and Mexico in this grand declaration, paints a picture of a disconnect from reality that has become a recurring theme. This statement, often delivered in a context that suggests a significant lapse in awareness, raises immediate concerns about cognitive function and fitness for public discourse, let alone leadership. The implication of “passing out in the Oval Office” further amplifies these worries, suggesting a physical and mental state far removed from the demands of the presidency.
The response to such pronouncements often veers towards a stark assessment: the individual should be in a place of care, specifically mentioning a “room with padded walls” and invoking the invocation of the 25th Amendment.… Continue reading
It’s quite something when a figure, ostensibly aligned with a political ideology, finds themselves utterly incapable of articulating any tangible improvements brought about by the very leaders they profess to support. This was precisely the predicament faced by a prominent gay right-winger, who, when pressed to name even a single positive development in America under Trump’s administration, was left completely speechless. The resulting performance was so remarkably devoid of substance that observers were left aghast, with one commentator succinctly capturing the spectacle by stating, “I have never seen anyone get their ass handed to them this badly.”
The exchange highlights a peculiar paradox for those who identify as politically conservative and also belong to LGBTQ+ communities.… Continue reading
During a White House press briefing, Dr. Mehmet Oz referred to Americans who oppose President Trump as “stupid” and “lost,” responding to a question about “Trump Derangement Syndrome.” This term, previously used against critics of George W. Bush, is employed to delegitimize opposition to Trump. Oz’s remarks came after he declined to defend President Trump’s controversial appointment of Bill Pulte as acting Director of National Intelligence, citing a lack of national security experience as a potential concern, despite Oz’s personal support for the appointment.
Read More
It appears quite evident, across a broad spectrum of observations, that Donald Trump’s tenure as Commander in Chief can be characterized by significant failure. From the outset, his capacity for leadership and effective governance seemed perpetually in question, a sentiment that appears to have been validated by many throughout his time in office and beyond.
The argument for his failure as Commander in Chief isn’t a new one; it’s a perspective that many have held since the very beginning of his presidency, with some suggesting that the indications of his unsuitability were apparent even before he took office. The idea that he might struggle with such a profound responsibility wasn’t a shock to everyone, as there seemed to be ample historical precedent in his past endeavors suggesting a propensity for enterprises that did not ultimately succeed.… Continue reading
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker