A House committee’s investigation revealed substantial evidence that Representative Matt Gaetz engaged in numerous illicit activities, including paying for sex with multiple women, one underage, using illegal drugs, accepting excessive gifts, and obstructing the investigation. The report concludes Gaetz violated House rules, state and federal laws, and ethical standards. Despite the findings, Gaetz has threatened retaliation against his former colleagues. The committee’s report stands as a permanent record of his actions, although his standing within a segment of the conservative movement appears to have increased.
Read More
A House Ethics Committee report found substantial evidence that former Rep. Matt Gaetz violated House rules and state laws, including those related to sexual misconduct and drug use. The report details allegations of payments to numerous women for sex, including a minor, and extensive illicit drug use, citing witness testimony, text messages, and financial records. Gaetz, who resigned from Congress before the report’s release, denies the accusations, claiming they are politically motivated. The report also alleges Gaetz accepted impermissible gifts and obstructed the investigation, though the Department of Justice previously declined to file federal charges.
Read More
Following the release of a damning House Ethics Committee report detailing allegations of sex with a minor and drug use, Steve Bannon urged former Representative Matt Gaetz to return to Congress. Bannon believes Gaetz should expose alleged “sexual depravity” among other lawmakers, dismissing the report as insignificant and claiming the Department of Justice would have acted if there were sufficient evidence. Gaetz, who resigned after being nominated for Attorney General, has also suggested returning to Congress or running for Senate. The report, which Gaetz’s legal team unsuccessfully tried to block, alleges various offenses including paying for sex, drug use, and obstruction of the investigation.
Read More
This article lacks the content needed for a summary. The provided text only shows a title, an illustration credit, and a call to action for tips. Therefore, no summary can be generated.
Read More
The House Ethics Committee report concluded there is substantial evidence that Representative Matt Gaetz violated Florida’s statutory rape law. This finding, based on their investigation, points to a serious breach of the law, potentially involving the sexual abuse of a minor.
The gravity of the situation is undeniable; the report’s conclusion suggests a pattern of behavior that warrants further scrutiny and potential legal action. The fact that the report uses the term “substantial evidence” indicates a high degree of confidence in their findings, adding weight to the severity of the allegations.
Questions immediately arise regarding the timeline of events and why action wasn’t taken sooner.… Continue reading
The House Ethics Committee released a report concluding that former Representative Matt Gaetz engaged in illicit activities, including sexual acts with a 17-year-old girl and paying women for sex. The report details substantial evidence of Gaetz’s drug use, acceptance of excessive gifts, and potential violations of state and federal laws. While the committee found insufficient evidence to support federal sex-trafficking charges, it did determine that Gaetz’s actions reflected discreditably on the House. Gaetz denies all wrongdoing.
Read More
A House Ethics Committee report details accusations that Representative Matt Gaetz, while in office, engaged in illicit sexual activity, including paying for sex with a minor, and used illicit drugs. The bipartisan investigation, spanning nearly five years, uncovered substantial evidence supporting these claims, along with violations of House rules regarding gifts and obstruction of Congress. Gaetz denies all allegations and filed a lawsuit to block the report’s release, arguing it contains defamatory information and exceeds the committee’s jurisdiction. The report’s release is unusual, given Gaetz’s resignation, but follows a narrow vote allowing its publication despite significant Republican opposition.
Read More
This article is protected by copyright and all rights are reserved. Its use is subject to Fortune Media IP Limited’s terms of use and privacy policies. The FORTUNE trademark is registered in the U.S. and other countries. Links to products and services may generate compensation for FORTUNE, and offers are subject to change.
Read More
A bipartisan spending deal passed by the House includes a cost-of-living pay raise for lawmakers—their first since 2009—and an opt-out from the Affordable Care Act’s health insurance requirements. These provisions, slipped into the bill unnoticed, are likely to face criticism; the pay raise is politically sensitive given Congress’s unpopularity, while the Obamacare opt-out could draw opposition from Democrats who were unaware of its inclusion. The pay raise has been sought for years, but its timing may prove detrimental. Republicans have long sought the ACA opt-out, while Democrats remain upset at its clandestine addition.
Read More
Charles Littlejohn, an IRS contractor, was sentenced to five years in prison for releasing the tax information of wealthy individuals, a sentence far exceeding sentencing guidelines and harsher than those given for comparable crimes. This disproportionate punishment, influenced by Republican lobbying, highlights the undue influence of the wealthy on the justice system. Littlejohn’s actions, which exposed significant tax avoidance by billionaires, were intended to serve the public interest. A presidential commutation is urged to rectify this injustice and protect Littlejohn from potential retribution from President-elect Trump.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood