Netanyahu’s wife pressed several ministers to sign a letter urging President Herzog to pardon Netanyahu, saying: “This is good timing – even Trump asked, it’s important for us. The cases are baseless and will lead nowhere anyway, let’s just finish with this.” It’s hard not to immediately focus on the audacity of it all, isn’t it? The sheer gall of trying to preemptively secure a pardon, while simultaneously proclaiming innocence. It’s like saying, “We haven’t done anything wrong, but just in case, let’s get a get-out-of-jail-free card.” That’s the first thing that hits you – the blatant acknowledgment that something is amiss, even if they’re trying to paint it otherwise.… Continue reading
The demolition of the White House’s East Wing, along with the construction of a lavish ballroom, symbolizes a troubling trend of executive corruption. President Trump is using his position to benefit from corporate donors, blurring ethical lines and transforming the government into a vehicle for self-interest. This brazen behavior is facilitated by a political system that no longer prioritizes curbing corruption, as evidenced by weakened regulations and court decisions like Citizens United. The response from both parties has been inadequate, highlighting the pervasive influence of the same corrupt corporate oligarchy that funds Trump, ultimately showcasing a blatant disregard for ethical governance.
Read More
So, let’s break this down: the Trump administration, defying the established rules of the game, decided to shuffle around money specifically earmarked for anti-terrorism efforts. The twist? This wasn’t a random decision; the funds were diverted away from states typically aligned with the Democratic party and steered towards those that lean Republican. It’s like Congress created a system, a framework for how these funds should be used and where they should go, but the administration went, “Nah, we’ll do our own thing.”
It’s important to understand the basics here: Congress, the legislative branch, had a law in place directing how anti-terrorism money should be allocated.… Continue reading
Watchdog group files Hatch Act complaint over federal agencies blaming Democrats for shutdown.
Here’s the situation: a watchdog group has filed a Hatch Act complaint because they believe federal agencies are unfairly blaming Democrats for the government shutdown. It seems like a familiar tune, doesn’t it? The Hatch Act is meant to keep federal employees from playing partisan politics. The general consensus is that the Hatch Act is a law that’s difficult to enforce, especially when those in power are the ones who would need to enforce it. There’s a real frustration here, a sense of the rules not mattering.
The process for dealing with Hatch Act violations involves a few different organizations, all under the president’s control.… Continue reading
Republicans refusing to swear in a newly elected Democrat is a blatant obstruction, and the implications are deeply concerning. It immediately brings into question the integrity of the entire process and raises suspicions about what they might be trying to hide. The fact that a duly elected official is being denied their right to serve, seemingly for political reasons, is a direct assault on the democratic process. It’s hard not to see this as a power grab, a deliberate attempt to undermine the will of the voters, and it’s all the more troubling given the context of the ongoing Epstein investigations.… Continue reading
Shakur fled to Cuba in 1984 after a period as a fugitive in the U.S., where she was granted political asylum. During her time in Cuba, she wrote extensively, including her autobiography, “Assata: An Autobiography.” In 2013, she was added to the FBI’s “Most Wanted” list. Her life and writings reflect the range of Black American responses to racial oppression, highlighting the importance of awareness in the fight for freedom.
Read More
During a White House briefing, the press secretary claimed that border czar Tom Homan did not accept a $50,000 payment from undercover FBI agents, despite internal documents and reporting from MSNBC suggesting otherwise. The alleged payment was in exchange for securing government contracts in a future Trump administration, with the exchange recorded on tape. Although Homan did not deny taking the money, he maintained that he did nothing illegal. The investigation was reportedly closed after President Trump took office.
Read More
A Department of Justice official, Joseph Schnitt, was secretly filmed by an employee of the O’Keefe Media Group divulging plans to redact Republican names from Jeffrey Epstein’s client list. The official claimed the department would release a “slanted version” of the files, showcasing a cover-up. Schnitt also detailed internal conflicts regarding the Epstein files, including the decision to move Ghislaine Maxwell to a minimum security prison, allegedly to keep her silent. Following the release of the video, the DOJ refuted the claims, stating they had no basis in reality.
Read More
GOP support erodes for Epstein files petition. It seems the initial enthusiasm, if it ever truly existed, for the release of the Epstein files is fading fast within the Republican Party. It’s almost as if, at the crucial moment, when action was actually needed, the commitment to transparency and justice… well, it vanished. This shift is hardly surprising to anyone who has been watching the political landscape. We’re talking about a party that increasingly appears to prioritize loyalty to certain figures, and perhaps, financial benefactors, over any semblance of principle.
GOP support erodes for Epstein files petition. The sudden change of heart, the backpedaling, it’s becoming a familiar pattern.… Continue reading
Ghislaine Maxwell, convicted of sex trafficking, has provided testimony clearing former President Donald Trump of any inappropriate behavior, describing him as a gentleman. Despite Maxwell’s history of perjury, her praise for Trump has been welcomed by his supporters. Trump has since dismissed the Epstein case as a “Democrat hoax,” and stated that he “couldn’t care less” about the release of files. The author finds this character certificate from a convicted criminal to be irrelevant, given the multitude of pressing issues.
Read More
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker