The recent attempt by the Trump administration to defund the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB), which funds PBS and NPR, has sparked outrage and concern. This action, following a House subcommittee hearing filled with accusations of “sexualizing and grooming children,” is part of a broader attack on public media perceived as politically biased. The proposed cuts would disproportionately impact smaller, rural stations and jeopardize vital educational children’s programming like “Arthur,” “Daniel Tiger’s Neighborhood,” and “Molly of Denali.” While the CPB is privately funded and receives only about 15% of its budget from federal funds, the loss of this funding would have a devastating effect on access to quality educational content for children nationwide.
Read More
The Trump administration’s Army Corps work plans reveal a redirection of over $250 million from infrastructure projects in Democratic-leaning states, notably eliminating all funding for California, to Republican-led states. This prioritization, condemned by Representatives DeLauro and Kaptur, risks delaying crucial safety projects nationwide and represents a politicization of critical infrastructure investments. The move follows a Republican-backed budget cut of $1.4 billion (44%) to the Corps of Engineers, granting the administration full discretion over project allocation, a power previously held by Congress. This action undermines Congress’s intent and harms all Americans regardless of political affiliation.
Read More
Oklahoma’s new social studies standards, championed by Superintendent Ryan Walters, include a section instructing students to identify “discrepancies” in the 2020 election results, echoing unsubstantiated claims of fraud. This decision followed the state Senate’s refusal to reject the language, despite concerns raised by new board members regarding transparency and late changes made by Walters without their knowledge or public input. Walters defends the standards as “unapologetically conservative” and factual, while critics, including Democrats and some board members, argue the inclusion is politically motivated, inaccurate, and age-inappropriate. Support from groups like Moms for Liberty further underscores the highly partisan nature of this educational policy change.
Read More
A federal judge in Texas recently overturned a US rule that capped credit card late fees at $8. This decision has sparked significant outrage, particularly given the looming economic downturn. Many see this as yet another instance of the government acting against the interests of struggling Americans, exacerbating financial hardship during a precarious time.
The timing of this ruling, coinciding with an anticipated recession, is particularly galling to many. It feels like a deliberate move to increase the financial burden on individuals already struggling to make ends meet, especially those who may already be living paycheck to paycheck. The removal of this seemingly small cap on late fees represents a significant blow to consumers’ financial well-being.… Continue reading
Judge Boasberg, Chief Judge of the D.C. District Court, is presiding over multiple cases involving the Trump administration, raising concerns about potential bias in case assignments. This follows his previous ruling against the Trump administration’s deportation of Venezuelan migrants. The latest case involves a lawsuit against Trump officials stemming from a Signal group chat discussing a Yemen operation. Critics allege a pattern of politically motivated rulings in D.C. courts, demanding an investigation into this perceived bias.
Read More
FBI employees tasked with reviewing the Jeffrey Epstein files have been instructed to limit redactions, a directive that has sparked a flurry of speculation and concern. The exact parameters of this instruction remain unclear, fueling various interpretations and predictions about the final released documents.
Some believe the goal is to minimize redactions to protect only victims of Epstein’s alleged crimes, leaving the names of perpetrators untouched. This approach would prioritize exposing those involved in the alleged sex trafficking ring, regardless of their political affiliations or prominence.
However, a countervailing view suggests the redaction policy is far more selective, aiming to shield specific individuals or groups.… Continue reading
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt falsely claimed during a press briefing that Judge James Boasberg, who temporarily blocked Trump’s deportation of migrants, was a “Democrat activist” appointed by Barack Obama. NBC News correspondent Garrett Haake corrected Leavitt, noting Boasberg’s appointment by George W. Bush. Leavitt deflected by citing the number of injunctions against President Trump, framing the judge’s actions as part of a broader effort to obstruct the administration’s agenda. This instance marks Leavitt’s third fact-check from PolitiFact in just two months.
Read More
Musk’s DOGE, a seemingly rogue entity within the U.S. government, is dramatically slashing Education Department contracts, staff, and grants, leaving a trail of stunned educators and concerned citizens in its wake. The scale of these cuts is staggering, impacting researchers, support staff, and ultimately, the educational opportunities of countless students. This abrupt action raises serious questions about legality, fairness, and the long-term consequences for the nation’s educational infrastructure.
The sheer volume of contracts being terminated is alarming. We’re not just talking about a few minor adjustments; this is a wholesale dismantling of programs and initiatives, many of which are years in the making and already heavily invested.… Continue reading
Following TikTok’s return to the U.S., searches for content critical of Donald Trump are being suppressed for American users, yielding “no results found” messages. This censorship, confirmed via VPN comparisons with searches conducted outside the U.S., affects terms like “rigged election” and “fascism,” while searches with misspellings or targeting other political figures produce results. Users report similar restrictions on other platforms, sparking concerns about political bias and free speech limitations, with TikTok yet to publicly address these allegations. The widespread nature of these restrictions has led to significant user outrage and accusations that the platform has become a tool for propaganda.
Read More
Instagram is experiencing a technical glitch affecting search results for “Democrats,” displaying a “results hidden” message, while searches for “Republicans” yield significantly more results. This has led to accusations of political bias, although a social media expert suggests it’s likely a technical issue. Meta acknowledges the problem, affecting hashtags across the political spectrum, and states they are working to fix it promptly. The error, however, risks fueling conspiracy theories and harming Meta’s reputation.
Read More