Political Bias

Judge Overturns $8 Credit Card Late Fee Cap

A federal judge in Texas recently overturned a US rule that capped credit card late fees at $8. This decision has sparked significant outrage, particularly given the looming economic downturn. Many see this as yet another instance of the government acting against the interests of struggling Americans, exacerbating financial hardship during a precarious time.

The timing of this ruling, coinciding with an anticipated recession, is particularly galling to many. It feels like a deliberate move to increase the financial burden on individuals already struggling to make ends meet, especially those who may already be living paycheck to paycheck. The removal of this seemingly small cap on late fees represents a significant blow to consumers’ financial well-being.… Continue reading

ICE Abduction of Student Sparks Outrage: Due Process Violated, Motive Unclear

Judge Boasberg, Chief Judge of the D.C. District Court, is presiding over multiple cases involving the Trump administration, raising concerns about potential bias in case assignments. This follows his previous ruling against the Trump administration’s deportation of Venezuelan migrants. The latest case involves a lawsuit against Trump officials stemming from a Signal group chat discussing a Yemen operation. Critics allege a pattern of politically motivated rulings in D.C. courts, demanding an investigation into this perceived bias.

Read More

FBI Limits Redactions in Epstein Files: Trump’s Name a Key Focus

FBI employees tasked with reviewing the Jeffrey Epstein files have been instructed to limit redactions, a directive that has sparked a flurry of speculation and concern. The exact parameters of this instruction remain unclear, fueling various interpretations and predictions about the final released documents.

Some believe the goal is to minimize redactions to protect only victims of Epstein’s alleged crimes, leaving the names of perpetrators untouched. This approach would prioritize exposing those involved in the alleged sex trafficking ring, regardless of their political affiliations or prominence.

However, a countervailing view suggests the redaction policy is far more selective, aiming to shield specific individuals or groups.… Continue reading

White House Official Fact-Checked on Live TV for False Claim About Judge

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt falsely claimed during a press briefing that Judge James Boasberg, who temporarily blocked Trump’s deportation of migrants, was a “Democrat activist” appointed by Barack Obama. NBC News correspondent Garrett Haake corrected Leavitt, noting Boasberg’s appointment by George W. Bush. Leavitt deflected by citing the number of injunctions against President Trump, framing the judge’s actions as part of a broader effort to obstruct the administration’s agenda. This instance marks Leavitt’s third fact-check from PolitiFact in just two months.

Read More

Musk’s Administration Slashes Education Funding, Sparking Outrage

Musk’s DOGE, a seemingly rogue entity within the U.S. government, is dramatically slashing Education Department contracts, staff, and grants, leaving a trail of stunned educators and concerned citizens in its wake. The scale of these cuts is staggering, impacting researchers, support staff, and ultimately, the educational opportunities of countless students. This abrupt action raises serious questions about legality, fairness, and the long-term consequences for the nation’s educational infrastructure.

The sheer volume of contracts being terminated is alarming. We’re not just talking about a few minor adjustments; this is a wholesale dismantling of programs and initiatives, many of which are years in the making and already heavily invested.… Continue reading

TikTok’s Algorithm Shifts: Anti-Trump Searches Suppressed, Concerns of Propaganda Rise

Following TikTok’s return to the U.S., searches for content critical of Donald Trump are being suppressed for American users, yielding “no results found” messages. This censorship, confirmed via VPN comparisons with searches conducted outside the U.S., affects terms like “rigged election” and “fascism,” while searches with misspellings or targeting other political figures produce results. Users report similar restrictions on other platforms, sparking concerns about political bias and free speech limitations, with TikTok yet to publicly address these allegations. The widespread nature of these restrictions has led to significant user outrage and accusations that the platform has become a tool for propaganda.

Read More

Instagram’s Hidden Search Results for “Democrats” Spark Censorship Accusations

Instagram is experiencing a technical glitch affecting search results for “Democrats,” displaying a “results hidden” message, while searches for “Republicans” yield significantly more results. This has led to accusations of political bias, although a social media expert suggests it’s likely a technical issue. Meta acknowledges the problem, affecting hashtags across the political spectrum, and states they are working to fix it promptly. The error, however, risks fueling conspiracy theories and harming Meta’s reputation.

Read More

Democrats Accuse FBI of Ignoring Key Witnesses in Hegseth Vetting

Democrats are voicing concerns that the FBI failed to interview key witnesses during the background check for Pete Hegseth’s nomination. This omission is raising serious questions about the thoroughness and impartiality of the investigation.

The lack of interviews with critical witnesses is particularly troubling given Hegseth’s history. Allegations of past misconduct, including issues related to alcohol and workplace behavior, should have prompted a more comprehensive inquiry. This situation echoes the controversy surrounding the Brett Kavanaugh Supreme Court nomination, where similar concerns about the scope of the FBI investigation were raised.

The parallels to the Kavanaugh investigation are striking. In both cases, credible allegations of misconduct were made, yet critical witnesses appear to have been overlooked by the FBI.… Continue reading

DOJ Watchdog: Officials Attempted 2020 Election Interference

DOJ officials may have tried to sway the 2020 election in favor of then-President Trump, according to a recent internal watchdog report. This report, obtained through a public records request, alleges that three senior officials engaged in misconduct by leaking details of a non-public investigation into COVID-19 deaths in nursing homes. The timing of the leak, just before the election, raises serious concerns about its underlying motivations.

The investigation focused on nursing homes in four states—New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Michigan—all governed by Democrats at the time. The report suggests that the Trump administration directed attorneys to concentrate their efforts on New York and New Jersey despite evidence suggesting that other states had more significant quality-of-care issues in their nursing homes.… Continue reading