To streamline the hiring process, individuals associated with certain figures—including Charles Koch, John Bolton, Nikki Haley, and several other prominent conservatives—will not be considered. This decision reflects ongoing grievances and a willingness to leverage political power for retribution. The arbitrary nature of the list suggests a lack of coherent criteria beyond personal animosity. This exclusionary approach, targeting both former and current allies, highlights a persistent pattern of settling scores.
Read More
Pete Hegseth’s nomination as Secretary of Defense is deeply concerning. His lack of relevant experience and questionable character raise serious doubts about his suitability for such a critical role. The sheer scale and complexity of the Department of Defense demand a leader with a proven track record of strategic thinking, effective management, and a deep understanding of military operations. Hegseth’s background falls drastically short of these essential qualifications.
Hegseth’s experience primarily centers around his role as a National Guard Major and his career in media. While military service is commendable, it does not automatically translate to the expertise required to lead one of the world’s most powerful military forces.… Continue reading
Duckworth’s assertion that Trump’s Pentagon pick possesses less experience than an Applebee’s manager highlights a concerning trend of unqualified appointments. The sheer lack of relevant experience in this particular nomination is striking, prompting questions about the qualifications deemed necessary for such a high-stakes position.
This nomination underscores a broader issue regarding the qualifications of individuals selected for critical governmental roles. The contrast drawn with an Applebee’s manager, while seemingly hyperbolic, serves to emphasize the perceived deficiency in experience and expertise. The implication is that even a restaurant manager might possess more relevant skills and experience than the proposed candidate.
Furthermore, the argument extends beyond mere experience.… Continue reading
A former FBI director, a figurehead from the Reagan era, is expressing significant concerns regarding the potential appointments of Tulsi Gabbard and Kash Patel to positions of power. The concerns stem from a range of issues, raising serious questions about their suitability for such roles.
The director’s cautionary remarks about Kash Patel highlight Patel’s controversial past and his promotion of various conspiracy theories. His book, “Deep State Gangsters,” praised by Donald Trump, is seen as promoting unfounded allegations against the government. Patel’s advocacy of election denial, anti-vaccine sentiments, and QAnon conspiracy theories are cited as further reasons for concern. His past involvement with the Nunes Memo, an effort to discredit the FBI’s Russia investigation, and his support for the idea of suing journalists add to the apprehension.… Continue reading
Donald Trump’s recent staffing choices reveal a preference for candidates with significant electoral defeats, a pattern contradicting his public pronouncements on winning. This selection of “losers,” including figures like Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Lori Chavez-Deremer, and Marco Rubio, suggests a prioritization beyond simple electoral success. Analysis indicates this may reflect a strategic approach or a different set of criteria for his administration. The implications of this staffing strategy are debated by political experts.
Read More
President-elect Trump’s cabinet selections notably prioritize individuals with television and entertainment backgrounds, a departure from traditional government appointments. This includes prominent figures from Fox News such as Pete Hegseth (Defense Secretary), and others from various media platforms. Several nominees, including Dr. Mehmet Oz and Mike Huckabee, bring unconventional experience to key roles overseeing health and foreign policy, respectively. This trend contrasts sharply with President Biden’s focus on cabinet diversity, highlighting a significant difference in leadership approaches.
Read More
The Independent provides in-depth coverage of crucial US issues, from reproductive rights to the influence of Big Tech, ensuring balanced reporting by speaking to all sides of a story. This commitment to factual reporting is exemplified by recent investigations and documentaries like ‘The A Word’. Unlike many outlets, The Independent remains free for all readers, relying on donations to support its investigative journalism. This model ensures quality news remains accessible to all Americans regardless of political affiliation or financial status.
Read More
The nomination of Mr. Phelan as Navy Secretary is unusual given his lack of military or significant prior Navy experience, a departure from recent predecessors. This contrasts sharply with his substantial financial contributions to the Trump campaign, exceeding $800,000, and his hosting of a high-dollar fundraising event at his residence. This appointment has prompted online criticism, with even some Trump supporters expressing concerns about potential cronyism. His position on the board of a military support nonprofit is noted, though it doesn’t fully offset the lack of direct Navy ties.
Read More
President-elect Trump nominated John Phelan, a Republican megadonor and finance executive with no military experience, as the next Secretary of the Navy. Phelan’s fundraising efforts for the Trump campaign appear to be his primary qualification for the position. Criticism has arisen regarding Phelan’s lack of relevant experience, prompting concerns about the increasing politicization of cabinet appointments. This nomination follows other controversial selections, including a Defense Secretary pick facing sexual assault allegations.
Read More
Despite Trump’s public denials, numerous authors of the Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025, a comprehensive plan for a Republican administration, have been appointed to key positions within his incoming government. These appointments include individuals responsible for chapters on various agencies and policy areas outlined in the 900-page document. The plan itself calls for sweeping changes, including mass firings, agency abolishment, and significant policy shifts. While Trump and his campaign have attempted to distance themselves, the appointments and subsequent admissions from right-wing media figures suggest a strong connection between Project 2025 and the incoming administration’s agenda.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood