Political Appointees

Pentagon Purge: Decorated Admiral Replaced by DOGE Goon Under Hegseth

The Pentagon is undergoing a major leadership overhaul under Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, with Rear Admiral Kurt Rothenhaus, head of the Office of Naval Research, being replaced by 33-year-old Rachel Riley, a former DOGE employee, who lacks military experience. This follows the departure of three-star General Joe McGee, who served on the Joint Staff, amidst reported tension. These moves are part of a broader trend of experienced officials being removed from their positions within the Defense Department under the current administration, alongside previous high-profile dismissals of key military leaders.

Read More

College Grad With No Experience Leads Terror Prevention Team, Sparks Outrage

Following military strikes against Iran and heightened terror risk warnings, the appointment of 22-year-old Thomas Fugate, a former Heritage Foundation intern with no prior government leadership or security experience, to a leadership role at the Department of Homeland Security’s Center for Prevention Programs and Partnerships (CP3) has drawn criticism. The CP3 oversees an $18 million grant program to combat violent extremism, and experts have expressed concern over Fugate’s qualifications, especially as he replaced an Army veteran with over 20 years of national security experience. While CP3 doesn’t engage in law enforcement, officials worry that replacing an experienced leader with someone lacking relevant expertise undermines the agency’s mission of preventing terrorism. Critics note that Fugate’s previous experience includes a brief stint as a gardener and internships, questioning his ability to effectively address complex counterterrorism challenges.

Read More

Musk Associates Attempted Treasury System Takeover to Halt USAID Funding

Following President Trump’s inauguration, Elon Musk’s appointees at the Treasury Department attempted to halt USAID payments using the department’s payment system. This request, deemed legally dubious by Acting Secretary David Lebryk, sparked a conflict between political appointees and career civil servants. The ensuing controversy led to Lebryk’s resignation and a tense political debate over the extent of access granted to Musk’s team, with conflicting reports on whether their access was “read-only” or permitted broader control over the system. This incident raises significant concerns about potential executive overreach and the politicization of federal funds. The matter is currently under investigation.

Read More

Trump’s Project 2025: A Post-Election Embrace of a Previously Disavowed Agenda

Despite initial disavowals by President-elect Trump and his allies, who viewed Project 2025 as a political liability, the Trump transition team is now utilizing the project’s extensive personnel database to fill thousands of vacant political appointee positions. This database, containing vetted conservative candidates, is proving invaluable in the staffing process. While some individuals associated with Project 2025 are being considered for key roles, others, particularly those advocating for extreme policies, are facing rejection. The transition team emphasizes its commitment to appointing qualified individuals who will advance President Trump’s agenda.

Read More

J.D. Vance’s radical plan to build a government of Trump loyalists: “Fire every single midlevel bureaucrat, every civil servant in the administrative state, replace them with our people.”

As I ponder J.D. Vance’s radical plan to overhaul the government by replacing every midlevel bureaucrat and civil servant with Trump loyalists, I can’t help but feel a sense of dread wash over me. The implications of such a move are staggering, and the potential fallout could be catastrophic for our country.

Imagine a scenario where Fred, your alcoholic neighbor down the street, is now in charge of city planning simply because he had the most Trump signs in his yard. This is the reality that Vance envisions, where political allegiance trumps competency and expertise. The very backbone of our government, the civil service, would be dismantled and replaced with individuals more aligned with a particular ideology than with serving the people.… Continue reading