Schumer to force reading of 1,000-page GOP mega bill, delaying it by half a day. This whole situation feels like a long overdue reckoning, doesn’t it? The idea that politicians are voting on bills they haven’t even read is, frankly, mind-boggling. Schumer forcing the reading of a 1,000-page Republican mega-bill, even if it only delays things by half a day, is a step in the right direction. It’s a basic expectation, really, that those making laws actually understand what they’re voting on.
It’s not like this is a new problem. People have been griping about the sheer size and complexity of legislation for ages.… Continue reading
Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt defended President Trump’s two-week deadline for deciding on potential action against Iran, despite his history of setting similar deadlines and failing to meet them. Leavitt attributed past missed deadlines to Trump’s pursuit of diplomatic solutions, citing past negotiations between Russia and Ukraine as an example. However, a reporter highlighted Trump’s repeated use of this tactic, referencing instances related to the Ukraine conflict and the resulting skepticism surrounding this latest deadline. Leavitt countered criticism by blaming the Biden administration for the current global conflicts.
Read More
Internal dissent towards President Trump’s fitness for office persists within his administration, though fear prevents overt action. Current White House staff reportedly view Trump as even more impulsive and unchecked than previously. This concern mirrors Miles Taylor’s earlier anonymous criticisms and subsequent publications detailing a lack of internal restraint on the president’s actions. The prevailing atmosphere prioritizes loyalty over dissent, leading to potentially damaging decisions.
Read More
The Proud Boys leaders’ demand for $100 million in compensation over their January 6th prosecutions is a truly astonishing development. The audacity of this claim, following their convictions for seditious conspiracy and other charges related to the attack on the Capitol, is staggering. It’s difficult to comprehend how individuals who participated in an attempt to overturn a democratic election could even contemplate such a lawsuit.
The sheer nerve involved is breathtaking. These individuals were convicted, their actions were undeniably aimed at undermining democratic processes, and yet they seek financial reward from the very government they sought to overthrow. It’s a blatant attempt to profit from sedition, a complete disregard for the rule of law, and an insult to every American who believes in the principles of democracy.… Continue reading
Following Elon Musk’s condemnation of the GOP spending bill, several House Republicans, including Representatives Marjorie Taylor Greene, Scott Perry, and Mike Flood, claimed ignorance of specific provisions within the legislation. These representatives asserted they would have voted against the bill had they been aware of these measures, which relate to AI regulation, contempt of court, and state rights. Their statements raise questions regarding their due diligence in reviewing the bill prior to voting. The timing of these admissions coincides with growing public disapproval and potential financial ramifications for some involved.
Read More
Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) recently admitted to voting for the “big, beautiful bill” without reading it, specifically citing a provision on pages 278-279 that prevents states from regulating AI for ten years. She now opposes this section, calling it a violation of state rights, and demands its removal. Greene’s admission sparked widespread online criticism for her failure to thoroughly review the legislation before voting. This incident follows a similar admission by Representative Mike Flood (R-NE), who also voted for a bill without full comprehension of its contents.
Read More
Marjorie Taylor Greene’s recent admission that she didn’t read the massive spending bill she voted for highlights a concerning lack of diligence in the legislative process. Her statement, “I would have voted NO if I had known this was in there,” speaks volumes about her approach to her duties as a representative. It raises serious questions not only about her competence but also about the entire process of lawmaking when such significant legislation is passed without thorough review by those voting on it.
The sheer scale of the bill, often referred to as a “mega bill,” undoubtedly contributes to the problem.… Continue reading
The Philadelphia Inquirer strongly criticized Senator John Fetterman for his high vote absence rate and limited engagement with colleagues and constituents, urging him to either fulfill his senatorial duties or resign. The editorial cites multiple sources indicating erratic behavior and staff departures, contrasting Fetterman’s overseas travel and media appearances with his lack of in-person interaction in Washington and Pennsylvania. Fetterman’s defense, citing family time and mental health struggles, is rejected by the Inquirer as insufficient justification for neglecting his public service responsibilities. The senator’s continued avoidance of town halls and direct constituent engagement further fuels calls for accountability ahead of the 2026 elections.
Read More
After four months leading the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), Elon Musk concluded his government service. While praising Musk’s efforts, President Trump acknowledged his departure. Despite his strong alliance with the Trump administration, Musk expressed reservations about certain policies, particularly the recently proposed multitrillion-dollar spending bill. Musk defended DOGE’s record of job cuts, but admitted the department faced disproportionate blame for various government actions.
Read More
Senator John Fetterman attributes his increased Senate attendance not to renewed dedication, but to media coverage he views as weaponizing his mental health struggles and absences. He feels his attendance is now performative, necessitated by the media narrative questioning his fitness for office. Fetterman cites missing mostly procedural votes to prioritize his family, while expressing regret over his openness about his mental health challenges. He draws parallels to media scrutiny of other public figures, highlighting the relentless nature of the narrative.
Read More
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker