This page uses Google AMP technology for a faster mobile experience. Essential data is stored on your device to enable page functionality; however, optional data collection allows for personalized ads outside the UK. Rejecting data collection prevents personalized ads but not all advertising. Consent preferences are stored locally and can be adjusted at any time via the footer’s “Ad Choices / Do not sell my info” link.
Representative Jasmine Crockett and others have expressed concern over President Trump’s mental fitness, particularly in light of his controversial tariff policies. This concern, echoed by some hedge fund managers, stems from the perceived irrationality and potential instability of these economic decisions. Crockett likened the experience of a second Trump term to an “abusive relationship,” highlighting the economic anxieties his policies have created. Even a CNBC reporter labeled Trump’s actions “insane.” The president, however, maintains he is in excellent health.
Dave Portnoy, the controversial figure known for his online persona and outspoken political views, recently dubbed the stock market downturn “Orange Monday.” This moniker, a clear reference to the association of the color orange with former President Trump and the MAGA movement, highlights the growing unease among some Trump supporters as the economic consequences of certain policies become more apparent.
The term itself reflects a shift in sentiment, at least for some. While Portnoy has been a vocal supporter of Trump in the past, “Orange Monday” suggests a dawning recognition that the economic landscape isn’t aligning with previous expectations. The playful, yet pointed, name implies a level of frustration and perhaps even regret, casting a satirical lens on a situation that’s far from humorous for many investors.… Continue reading
Following President Trump’s self-proclaimed title as “fertilization president” and promises to expand IVF access, the CDC’s Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance team was eliminated. This team tracked IVF success rates and provided public resources, including an IVF success estimator. Pundit Catherine Rampell called for apologies from Republicans who supported Trump’s claims, citing his contradictory actions. The team’s elimination fueled criticism, highlighting the disconnect between Trump’s rhetoric and the reality of reduced funding for IVF research and support.
In a recent address at Hamilton College, former President Obama sharply criticized President Trump’s actions. He highlighted Trump’s attempts to dismantle the federal government, suppress dissent, and restrict the free press, arguing such behavior would have been met with far greater outrage had it been committed by previous administrations. Obama specifically cited Trump’s targeting of lawyers, universities, and news organizations as examples of an alarming disregard for fundamental American rights. He emphasized his concern not just for economic repercussions of Trump’s policies, but primarily for the erosion of democratic norms and the violation of civil liberties.
Waltz and his staff using Gmail for government communications is, frankly, astonishing. The sheer audacity of using a platform as readily accessible as Gmail for sensitive government discussions is baffling. It’s akin to using a YouTube comment section – hardly the epitome of secure communication. The fact that this happened at all suggests a level of disregard for security protocols that’s deeply troubling.
The lack of access to secure government systems early in the administration seems to be part of the problem. It’s claimed that directives from higher up discouraged compliance with security and disclosure requirements. This created an environment where resorting to readily available, but insecure, options like Gmail seemed almost inevitable.… Continue reading
Gabbard and Ratcliffe’s alleged repeated lies regarding Signal chat messages have ignited a firestorm of controversy. The situation has exposed a significant breach of trust, highlighting the critical need for accountability within government. This isn’t just about messaging apps; it’s about the integrity of those entrusted with power. The lack of serious bipartisan investigation is particularly troubling, raising questions about whether partisan politics are overshadowing the pursuit of justice.
The perceived lack of serious action on this matter reflects a deeper issue – a seeming unwillingness to hold powerful individuals accountable. This apparent double standard, where past investigations into similar issues were pursued vigorously but this one seemingly ignored, is creating a climate of distrust.… Continue reading
A French court issued a five-year ban from holding public office against Marine Le Pen, effective immediately, due to embezzlement charges. This decision significantly impacts her potential 2027 presidential candidacy, despite the possibility of appeal. The court found Le Pen and several associates guilty of misusing European Parliament funds to benefit her party, although no personal enrichment was proven. This ruling constitutes a major blow to Le Pen and her National Rally party, potentially altering the dynamics of French politics.
A majority of voters, and a significant plurality of Republicans, believe that Pete Hegseth should resign from his current position. This sentiment stems from a confluence of concerns regarding his suitability for the role, characterized by a pattern of behavior deemed unacceptable for someone holding such a position of responsibility.
The perception of Hegseth as a heavy drinker who has engaged in actions potentially jeopardizing national security is a central point of contention. Many see his continued presence as a profound risk, citing the potential for disastrous consequences stemming from impaired judgment and decision-making. This concern isn’t limited to hypothetical scenarios; the fear is palpable that his actions could lead to real-world harm, from compromising sensitive information to making critically flawed judgments with potentially devastating global repercussions.… Continue reading
Duckworth’s statement, calling Pete Hegseth a “f‑‑‑ing liar,” is a stark condemnation rooted in a serious allegation of reckless leaking of classified information. The gravity of the situation, according to Duckworth, is the potential harm to American pilots, a consequence that underscores the severity of her accusation. The language she uses reflects the intensity of her anger and concern.
The assertion that Hegseth’s actions could have resulted in the deaths of pilots highlights the potential consequences of mishandling classified information. This isn’t just a political disagreement; it’s about national security, and the potential for catastrophic consequences. Duckworth’s strong words reflect the serious nature of the alleged offense.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood