It’s truly astonishing to hear that two staffers involved with DOGE, when questioned under oath, expressed no regrets for individuals losing their livelihoods and, furthermore, admitted that their actions did not in fact reduce the federal deficit. These depositions paint a rather stark picture of the mindset of some individuals in positions of influence. The assertion of no regrets, particularly when faced with the tangible consequence of people losing income, speaks volumes about a potential disconnect from the human impact of policy decisions.
The claim that the deficit was not reduced, despite the stated intentions or justifications for their actions, raises significant questions about the efficacy and purpose of the DOGE initiative.… Continue reading
Recent events have highlighted a pattern of apparent ignorance from the president regarding crucial policy decisions and the actions of his own administration. Trump has repeatedly responded to direct questions about pardons, foreign policy, and administrative actions with “I don’t know.” This pattern of non-answers extends to topics ranging from military aid and student visa policies to even basic constitutional concepts. The frequency of these instances raises questions about the president’s knowledge and involvement in the very matters he is responsible for overseeing.
Read More
President Trump’s order to reopen Alcatraz as a maximum-security prison followed the airing of the film *Escape from Alcatraz* on his local television station. His subsequent social media posts and statements strongly suggest the movie influenced his decision, linking the prison to concepts of law and order. This decision, however, has been met with criticism from San Francisco officials who deem it nonsensical. Simultaneously, Trump announced a 100% tariff on foreign-made films, further highlighting the apparent connection between his media consumption and policy decisions.
Read More
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker