The Trump administration is proposing to undo or delay drinking water limits on several “forever chemicals” known as PFAS. This plan, announced by EPA administrator Lee Zeldin and US health secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., aims to rescind existing limits on four PFAS compounds and delay implementation for two others, despite scientific evidence linking them to serious health problems. Public health advocates have strongly condemned the move, labeling it a dangerous rollback of protections that would put millions of Americans at risk from contaminated drinking water. The EPA claims the new rules are part of a “clean water mandate” and will avoid future litigation by re-evaluating the process for setting limits.
Read More
Levels of particularly hazardous PFAS compounds have significantly decreased in Canadian seabird eggs, a trend the study’s authors interpret as evidence of regulatory effectiveness. Analysis of northern gannet eggs over 55 years revealed a substantial decline in PFAS concentrations, particularly after peak usage in the late 1990s and early 2000s. This reduction correlates with industry shifts away from problematic compounds like PFOS and PFOA, driven by increasing regulatory scrutiny and international agreements to phase out their use. While this represents positive progress, the continued presence of legacy PFAS and the emergence of newer, less detectable compounds necessitate ongoing scientific and regulatory vigilance.
Read More
The Japanese Ministry of Defense announced that the U.S. military has denied Okinawa Prefecture’s request to conduct on-site inspections of U.S. military facilities due to the detection of PFAS, a potentially harmful organic fluorine compound, in the surrounding areas. The U.S. cited a lack of clear data linking the facilities as the source of contamination, as well as the absence of agreed-upon environmental standards and specific sampling locations. Despite the denial, the U.S. military stated they might consider allowing inspections if the purpose is to ensure the safety of drinking water and if certain conditions are met. The facilities include Marine Corps Air Station Futenma, Camp Hansen, and Kadena Air Base.
Read More
Scientists are sounding the alarm regarding synthetic chemicals prevalent in the food system, citing their contribution to increased cancer rates, neurodevelopmental issues, and infertility, while simultaneously damaging global agriculture. A recent report estimates the health burden from phthalates, bisphenols, pesticides, and PFAS chemicals could reach $2.2 trillion annually, with additional ecological costs. The study forecasts a potential decline of 200 to 700 million births between 2025 and 2100 due to exposure to endocrine disruptors. The research focuses on chemicals used in plastic additives, pesticides, and food contact materials.
Read More
A recent study by Pesticide Action Network Europe (PAN) revealed widespread contamination of European cereal products with trifluoroacetic acid (TFA), a “forever chemical” produced when pesticides containing PFAS break down. Breakfast cereals were found to be the most contaminated food, with average concentrations far exceeding those in tap water. The study detected TFA in 81.5% of samples across various cereal-based products in 16 European countries. Experts are calling for an immediate ban on PFAS pesticides, as TFA poses risks to reproductive health and potentially other adverse effects, and governments do not currently monitor TFA in food.
Read More
The EPA recently approved ten pesticide products containing isocycloseram, a PFAS “forever chemical,” for use in agriculture and pest control. Although the EPA claims no human health risks were identified when used as directed, environmental advocates express concerns about the long-term dangers associated with PFAS exposure, such as reproductive and liver toxicity. Researchers emphasize the persistence of isocycloseram and its toxicity to pollinators. While the EPA highlighted the benefits for crop management, concerns remain due to the potential ecological and public health impacts.
Read More
In a significant move, DuPont and two other companies have agreed to pay New Jersey up to $2 billion to resolve environmental claims related to PFAS contamination. This landmark settlement, the largest in the state’s history, involves an $875 million payment over 25 years and a remediation fund of up to $1.2 billion. The companies will share the financial burden, and the agreement still requires court approval. The state is holding the companies accountable for the pollution caused by these “forever chemicals” known for their persistence in the environment and potential health hazards.
Read More
New Mexico has filed a lawsuit against the US Air Force due to its failure to address significant PFAS pollution from Cannon Air Force Base, contaminating drinking water and agricultural land. Despite acknowledging the source of a four-mile chemical plume, the Air Force has largely disregarded state orders, leading to a seven-year battle and the state incurring associated costs. The lawsuit seeks water treatment solutions, pollution controls, and compensation for affected individuals, as the Air Force’s inaction has been criticized. The situation at Cannon is not unique, as the Air Force is often slow to respond to PFAS pollution at other bases nationwide, even with funding available for remediation.
Read More
The Trump administration announced plans to rescind and postpone Biden-era regulations limiting “forever chemicals” (PFAS) in drinking water. These rollbacks will repeal limits on four PFAS chemicals and delay implementation of limits on two others, despite widespread PFAS contamination linked to serious health problems. The decision follows a lawsuit from the chemical industry and water utilities who argued the regulations were overly burdensome. Environmental groups plan to sue, citing the Safe Drinking Water Act’s anti-backsliding provision. The EPA claims the new rules will reduce burdens on water systems while maintaining public health protections.
Read More
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is reportedly planning to weaken a crucial rule designed to curb the presence of “forever chemicals,” or PFAS, in our drinking water. This decision has sparked considerable outrage and confusion, with many questioning the motives behind such a move. The proposed weakening of regulations, which previously aimed to establish strict limits on PFAS contamination, raises serious concerns about public health and environmental protection.
This rollback is particularly alarming given the known dangers of PFAS. These chemicals, persistent and resistant to degradation, accumulate in the environment and human bodies, potentially leading to various health problems. The EPA’s own research underscores the significant risks associated with even low levels of PFAS exposure.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood