U.S. Ambassador to Canada Pete Hoekstra expressed disappointment regarding the anti-American sentiment he perceives within Canada, particularly following U.S. tariffs. Hoekstra cited a “campaign” against America as contributing to this sentiment, with Canadian politicians and experts pushing back against his claims. Flavio Volpe criticized Hoekstra’s statements, suggesting his objective lies in Washington. Conservative House Leader Andrew Scheer stated that Canadians will react negatively to aggressive foreign policy, while Finance Minister Fran çois-Philippe Champagne emphasized the economic impact of the tariffs.
Read More
U.S. Ambassador to Canada Pete Hoekstra expressed disappointment regarding the anti-American sentiment he perceives in Canada, particularly among politicians. Hoekstra noted that rhetoric, such as describing trade disputes as “wars,” is unhelpful. He defended President Trump’s tariff agenda by suggesting Canada’s relative position has improved and is optimistic about reaching a trade deal. Hoekstra welcomed the removal of retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods, seeing it as a positive step, but warns that boycotts will still taint feedback from American businesses in upcoming consultations regarding the CUSMA review.
Read More
The U.S. Ambassador to Canada, Pete Hoekstra, stated that the White House initially aimed for a broader agreement with Canada, extending beyond the USMCA, and encompassing areas like defense and trade. While the U.S. hoped to negotiate a more comprehensive deal, this broader ambition seems unlikely to materialize at present. The ambassador also noted the U.S. is beginning public consultations on the USMCA as they determine what a revised deal would look like. Hoekstra acknowledged the economic impact of Canada’s actions against China, specifically the tariffs on Chinese EVs and steel, and indicated the U.S. appreciates Canada’s stance.
Read More
Ambassador Pete Hoekstra’s recent comments expressing outrage over Canadians’ reduced purchase of American products highlight the simmering tensions between the U.S. and Canada. His assertion that Canada’s actions are somehow an “insult” completely misses the mark, ignoring the larger context of strained relations fueled by aggressive trade policies and thinly veiled threats of annexation.
The idea that Canada’s decreased consumption of American goods constitutes an “outrageous” act is ludicrous. It’s a market response, a natural consequence of the strained relationship and the perception of unfair trade practices originating from the United States. It wasn’t a government-mandated ban, but rather a reflection of consumer choices, a direct consequence of American actions.… Continue reading
During his Senate confirmation hearing, U.S. ambassador nominee Pete Hoekstra affirmed Canada’s sovereignty, distancing himself from President Trump’s annexation rhetoric. Despite Democrats’ concerns about Trump’s disrespectful language and trade policies harming the U.S.-Canada relationship, Hoekstra emphasized the countries’ long-standing partnership and expressed a desire for increased cooperation and freer trade. He acknowledged existing tensions but aimed to foster a more collaborative relationship, suggesting Trump’s comments might have been intended as a provocation towards Canada’s former prime minister. Hoekstra also stressed the importance of increased Canadian defense spending.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood