The Minnesota Star Tribune republished a New York Times opinion piece calling for Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s resignation following the revelation of a Signal group chat where sensitive discussions regarding Yemen airstrikes occurred. The chat included Hegseth, other high-ranking officials, and, inadvertently, journalist Jeffrey Goldberg. This incident, described as a serious security breach, prompted criticism from both Democrats and military figures citing concerns about Hegseth’s qualifications and conduct. While Hegseth denies discussing “war plans,” calls for his resignation or dismissal persist, fueled by concerns about the potential compromise of national security.
Read More
American Oversight sued Pete Hegseth and other Trump administration officials for violating the Federal Records Act. The lawsuit stems from a journalist’s inadvertent inclusion in a Signal group chat containing discussions of U.S. war plans, including details regarding a Yemen strike, allegedly shared by Hegseth. The chat employed an auto-delete feature, further complicating record-keeping compliance. The lawsuit argues that the officials’ actions were reckless and endangered national security, citing a recent Pentagon warning about Signal’s vulnerability to hacking. The White House is currently investigating the matter.
Read More
Senator Tammy Duckworth sharply criticized the potential appointment of Pete Hegseth as Secretary of Defense, deeming him the most unqualified candidate in history. Duckworth’s comments came during a discussion with Katy Tur about a separate matter—a journalist’s inclusion in a group chat concerning planned Yemen airstrikes. The controversy surrounding the leaked information overshadowed discussion of the potential Hegseth appointment. The senator’s strong statement highlights deep concerns about Hegseth’s suitability for the position.
Read More
Following the revelation that a Signal group chat concerning a Yemen bombing campaign included The Atlantic’s editor-in-chief, Senator Mark Warner demanded the resignations of National Security Advisor Mike Waltz and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. Warner cited the officials’ failure to observe basic security protocols as “sloppy, careless, and incompetent behavior,” particularly regarding the handling of potentially classified information. The hearing revealed conflicting testimony from administration officials, with some denying the gravity of the situation and others refusing to disclose the chat’s contents. President Trump defended Waltz, while Hegseth attempted to discredit the journalist and the report.
Read More
A top Intel Democrat is calling for the resignations of Representatives Mike Waltz and Pete Hegseth following the revelation of their involvement in a highly concerning communication incident. This incident, involving the sharing of sensitive military information via a seemingly unsecured messaging application, underscores a significant lapse in security protocols and raises serious questions about the competence and judgment of those involved.
The severity of this situation cannot be overstated. The use of unauthorized apps to discuss sensitive military plans, especially at the highest levels of government, is a blatant disregard for national security and established procedures. The potential consequences of such carelessness are immense, ranging from compromised operational plans to the exposure of sensitive intelligence to adversaries.… Continue reading
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth vehemently denied leaking U.S. airstrike plans on Yemen via a group chat that inadvertently included The Atlantic’s editor-in-chief, despite presented screenshots proving otherwise. Hegseth dismissed the report as a hoax perpetuated by a discredited journalist, while President Trump similarly denied knowledge of the incident and criticized The Atlantic. The leaked messages, however, reportedly detailed the attack minute-by-minute. National Security Adviser Mike Waltz’s future employment may be jeopardized due to his involvement in the group chat.
Read More
If Pete Hegseth had any honor, he would resign. This isn’t a question of whether he *should* resign; the sheer weight of evidence points overwhelmingly to the fact that his continued presence in his current position is an affront to the very concept of honor. The numerous accusations leveled against him—from credible accusations of rape to accusations of being an alcoholic and pathological liar—paint a picture of a man utterly unfit for public service, let alone a position of such significant responsibility.
If Pete Hegseth had any honor, he wouldn’t have taken the job in the first place. His qualifications have always been suspect, and the very fact that he was appointed suggests a complete disregard for competence and a prioritization of loyalty over capability.… Continue reading
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth vehemently denies sharing classified war plans via a Signal group chat that inadvertently included *The Atlantic*’s editor, Jeffrey Goldberg, despite the National Security Council confirming the message chain’s authenticity. This alleged security breach, involving high-ranking officials discussing Yemen strike plans, has sparked bipartisan outrage and calls for investigations into the incident. While the White House maintains confidence in its national security team, the incident raises serious concerns about operational security and potential legal ramifications. The ongoing controversy highlights significant vulnerabilities within the highest levels of the national security apparatus.
Read More
A significant security breach occurred when classified military plans for a Yemen strike were mistakenly shared via Signal with The Atlantic’s editor-in-chief, among other high-level officials, including Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. Hegseth’s text detailing the attack’s specifics sparked widespread outrage and calls for his resignation across social media, citing gross incompetence and a breach of national security protocols. President Trump, when questioned, dismissed the incident and criticized The Atlantic. The leak included Vice President Vance, Secretary Rubio, Director Gabbard, and National Security Advisor Waltz.
Read More
Despite his claims to prioritize military readiness and meritocracy, Secretary Hegseth has instead implemented policies prioritizing a white, Christian nationalist agenda. This includes purging experienced military leaders, cutting budgets, and undermining intelligence gathering, all while actively suppressing recognition of diverse groups and historical figures. Hegseth’s actions, such as reversing a policy barring segregation in defense contractor facilities and banning references to the Enola Gay, demonstrate a concerted effort to erase inclusivity from the military. His administration’s hiring of individuals promoting neo-Nazi ideologies further underscores this extreme agenda, revealing a focus on creating a military reflective of his narrow worldview.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood