Pete Hegseth, a right-wing provocateur, is critiqued for his actions, particularly his decision to remove Harvey Milk’s name from a Navy ship during Pride Month. The article contrasts Hegseth’s perceived weakness and lack of true warrior spirit with the genuine courage of Harvey Milk, a Navy veteran who fought for LGBTQ+ rights. Hegseth is accused of using this action to appeal to the MAGA base and to roll back LGBTQ+ inclusion in the military, while Milk is celebrated for his bravery and sacrifice in the face of adversity. The author emphasizes the significant difference in moral character between the two individuals, highlighting Milk’s legacy of hope and public service compared to Hegseth’s perceived actions.
Read More
Following a leaked preliminary Pentagon assessment that undermined President Trump’s claims of success in the recent Iran strikes, top allies Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Secretary of State Marco Rubio admitted the validity of the report’s findings. However, they vehemently attacked the leakers responsible for the intelligence leak, accusing them of political motivations and criticizing the media coverage. Hegseth confirmed an FBI investigation was underway while arguing the damage was “severe and obliterated,” and Rubio labeled the leakers “professional stabbers.” Despite the attacks, Trump conceded the report’s accuracy while also lashing out at the media.
Read More
Following the U.S. strikes on Iranian nuclear sites, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth received praise for not leaking the plans, a standard Democrats quickly mocked. Critics like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez ridiculed the praise, comparing it to celebrating basic competence. The strikes, described as an “overwhelming success” by Hegseth, have drawn threats of retaliation from Iran, with UN officials reporting significant damage. This conflict, escalating after Israeli strikes earlier in the month, has led to calls for impeachment.
Read More
President Trump authorized significant airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, marking a major escalation of US involvement in the Middle East. The operation was notable for its complete lack of pre-strike leaks, a stark contrast to previous incidents involving Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. This secrecy was celebrated by many, especially considering Hegseth’s involvement in the “Signalgate” scandal. However, some observers viewed the absence of leaks as a reflection on the administration’s overall competence regarding information security.
Read More
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s office instructed the Pentagon to adopt a passive approach to Juneteenth messaging, resulting in the cancellation of planned online content. This directive is part of a broader effort to eliminate diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives within the Department of Defense, a policy reflected in the removal of historical content celebrating Black, Latino, and women veterans. This action follows previous removals of articles celebrating figures like Jackie Robinson and the Tuskegee Airmen. The Army’s Juneteenth commemoration article was also deleted, although a press release acknowledging the holiday remains.
Read More
Following the “Signalgate” incident, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s influence within the Trump administration has significantly diminished, leading to his exclusion from high-level discussions regarding potential strikes on Iran. A smaller, “Tier One” group—including Vice President Vance, Secretary of State Rubio, CIA Director Ratcliffe, and General Caine—now advises the President on military and intelligence matters. Key briefings and war planning are conducted without Hegseth’s involvement, despite Pentagon claims to the contrary. This shift reflects President Trump’s increasing reliance on military leaders and intuition over formal cabinet advice, mirroring a similar decline in influence for Director of National Intelligence Gabbard.
Read More
During a Senate hearing, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth evaded questions regarding whether he authorized lethal force against protesters, reacting with laughter and deflection. Senator Slotkin referenced former Secretary Esper’s memoir, detailing President Trump’s 2020 order to shoot protesters, which Esper refused. Hegseth’s evasiveness continued, mirroring his earlier confirmation hearing where he similarly avoided directly addressing the issue. Further, Hegseth refused to guarantee compliance with federal court orders should the military’s actions against protestors be deemed illegal.
Read More
President Trump expressed anger over his sparsely attended military parade, blaming Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth for its perceived lack of “menacing” tone. Trump reportedly criticized the soldiers’ demeanor, believing they displayed excessive conviviality instead of military precision. This dissatisfaction led to a rebuke of Hegseth, with Trump emphasizing the parade’s failure to convey his desired image of power. The White House vehemently denied these claims, denouncing the source as unreliable.
Read More
During a House Armed Services Committee hearing, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth declined to deny the existence of Pentagon plans for potential military action in Greenland, responding vaguely to pointed questions from Representative Mike Turner. Hegseth’s evasive answers followed previous statements by the Trump administration expressing interest in acquiring Greenland, even suggesting the use of force. This refusal to definitively rule out an invasion aligns with the administration’s history of considering military options for territorial acquisitions, as evidenced by past discussions regarding the Panama Canal. The ambiguity surrounding these plans has fueled speculation about the true extent of U.S. intentions towards Greenland.
Read More
A California congressman, during a tense House Armed Services Committee hearing, directed a pointed and forceful statement towards the Secretary of Defense, Pete Hegseth, urging him to leave his position. The exchange, characterized by sharp disagreement and escalating tension, stemmed from a series of questions regarding various matters under Hegseth’s purview. The congressman’s frustration boiled over, leading to the blunt command to vacate the office.
The core of the disagreement appeared to center on the congressman’s concerns about the deployment of Marines to Los Angeles, which he viewed as politically motivated and theatrical. He expressed serious reservations about the strategic rationale behind the deployment, suggesting it lacked legitimate military justification and was instead a display of political posturing.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood