Rep. Don Bacon confirmed a one-day pause in U.S. cyber operations against Russia in February 2024, during ongoing peace negotiations, contradicting previous Pentagon denials. This pause, while typical during diplomatic efforts, was described by sources as lacking specificity in its directive. The Pentagon’s subsequent statement denying any such pause has been criticized as misleading, highlighting a pattern of the department bypassing traditional media outlets and attacking critical reporting. Bacon’s testimony marks the first on-the-record acknowledgment of the directive.
Read More
Facing turmoil in Pete Hegseth’s Pentagon office, the White House intervened, rejecting Hegseth’s choice of Marine Col. Ricky Buria as chief of staff. Buria’s limited experience, involvement in office drama, and failure to pass a polygraph test during a leak investigation contributed to the White House’s decision. Instead, the White House will select its own candidate, a move deemed unusual but intended to protect Hegseth and stabilize the department. Hegseth will retain Buria as a senior advisor as part of a compromise. This intervention is significant, given the office’s role in key defense policy decisions and the department’s substantial budget.
Read More
The Pentagon drafted a briefing for Elon Musk detailing over two dozen highly classified weapons systems designed for a potential war with China. This proposed briefing encompassed exceptionally sensitive Special Access Programs (SAP) information, the most tightly controlled and sensitive data within the Department of Defense.
The planned briefing raised significant concerns among Pentagon officials, particularly regarding ethical implications. The nature of the information involved, combined with Musk’s business interests in China and past controversies, fueled these concerns. The sheer volume and sensitivity of the classified weaponry information intended for disclosure highlighted the gravity of the situation.
Concerns escalated further due to Musk’s known ties to China and his history of controversial public statements.… Continue reading
The New York Times reported that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth shared classified information, including flight schedules for a Yemen military operation, in a second private Signal chat containing family members and his attorney. This revelation follows a previous leak to the editor of The Atlantic, prompting renewed calls for his resignation from Democratic Senators like Tammy Duckworth and Elizabeth Warren. The White House, however, continues to support Hegseth, contradicting accounts from a former Pentagon spokesman who described a chaotic and untruthful atmosphere within the department. Hegseth’s actions risk national security and further undermine confidence in the Pentagon’s leadership.
Read More
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth vehemently denied allegations of leaking sensitive war plans via Signal, accusing reporters of peddling “hoaxes” based on anonymous sources. This incident follows a previous controversy involving similar disclosures on the messaging app. Hegseth’s outburst occurred at the White House Easter Egg Roll, with his family present, as he defended his actions and criticized the media. His recent purging of Pentagon aides and facing criticism from a former spokesman further highlight the ongoing turmoil within the Department of Defense.
Read More
Despite a narrow Senate confirmation, Pete Hegseth’s tenure as Defense Secretary has been marred by controversy. He has twice shared sensitive attack plans via unsecured Signal chats, including with family members. This followed the firing of three senior Pentagon officials under unclear circumstances, prompting accusations of mismanagement and sparking widespread criticism. While the White House staunchly supports Hegseth, mounting evidence suggests his leadership is deeply flawed and facing increasing scrutiny.
Read More
President Trump prevented Elon Musk from attending a classified Pentagon briefing on potential military action against China due to concerns about Musk’s extensive business ties in the country. Although a meeting between Musk and Defense Secretary Hegseth proceeded, the China-related issues were omitted. Trump publicly denounced the news reports as false, and Hegseth subsequently launched an inquiry into the leak, resulting in the suspension of two Pentagon officials. Trump’s decision, while demonstrating his continued regard for Musk, highlighted potential conflicts of interest.
Read More
Pentagon acting Inspector General Steven Stebbins will review Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s use of the Signal app to discuss a Yemen military strike, including whether it violated DoD policies and classification rules. The review, prompted by Senatorial request, also examines other officials’ use of the app for official communication. The investigation follows the inadvertent inclusion of a journalist in a Signal group chat detailing the strike’s timing. Concerns center on the potential compromise of classified information and non-compliance with records retention laws, despite administration claims no such information was shared.
Read More
Phil Hegseth, brother of Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, serves as a senior advisor and DHS liaison at the Pentagon, a position raising concerns about potential nepotism. His role includes significant responsibilities, such as accompanying the Secretary on trips, including a recent Indo-Pacific tour, and interacting with high-profile individuals. While interagency liaisons are common, the placement of a cabinet member’s family member in such a senior role is unusual. Questions remain regarding Phil Hegseth’s qualifications and whether his hiring complies with federal nepotism laws.
Read More
Elon Musk was scheduled for a Pentagon briefing, the purpose of which was initially undisclosed but later denied by both Pentagon officials and President Trump as being related to China. The briefing, potentially concerning highly classified war plans against China, would represent a significant expansion of Musk’s advisory role. Despite official denials, concerns remain given the sensitivity of the information and Musk’s extensive business dealings with China. The potential disclosure of such plans could severely compromise US military strategy.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood