Following a New York Times report alleging a Pentagon briefing on China war plans for Elon Musk, both the Pentagon and Secretary Hegseth denied the report, clarifying the meeting focused on innovation and efficient production. Despite this, concerns remain regarding potential conflicts of interest given Musk’s extensive business dealings in China and existing contracts with the Pentagon. Former President Trump echoed these concerns, emphasizing the sensitive nature of military strategies and the inappropriateness of sharing such information with a businessman operating in China. The meeting ultimately addressed a broader range of topics, including but not limited to China.
Read More
Following a New York Times report detailing a planned Pentagon briefing with Elon Musk regarding potential U.S. war plans against China, both the Pentagon and President Trump denied the report’s accuracy, calling it “pure propaganda.” Musk himself condemned the leak on X, vowing to prosecute those responsible for disseminating what he deemed maliciously false information. The leak highlighted concerns about Musk’s growing influence in U.S. defense policy given his business dealings with both the U.S. and China. The briefing, had it occurred as reported, would have further emphasized Musk’s expanding influence through SpaceX contracts and political connections.
Read More
Elon Musk’s Friday Pentagon visit, initially reported as a top-secret briefing on China war plans by the Wall Street Journal and the New York Times, was refuted by both Musk and Secretary of Defense Hegseth. Musk denounced the NYT report as “pure propaganda” and threatened legal action against Pentagon leakers. Hegseth clarified the meeting’s focus as innovation and efficiency in production, while President Trump echoed this denial. The conflicting reports highlight Musk’s complex relationship with both the U.S. and Chinese governments, given his business interests and SpaceX’s substantial defense contracts.
Read More
Musk’s access to highly classified US war plans concerning a potential conflict with China is deeply unsettling. The sheer audacity of granting such sensitive information to a private citizen, let alone one with Elon Musk’s controversial history and extensive business ties to China, raises serious national security concerns. This decision completely bypasses standard vetting procedures, raising questions about the integrity of our security processes and the judgment of those involved.
The lack of a proper background check is particularly alarming, given well-documented concerns regarding Musk’s past substance use. This raises significant questions about the competence and potential vulnerabilities within the government’s security apparatus.… Continue reading
The recent removal of a Pentagon webpage celebrating Pfc. Ira Hayes, a Pima Indian and one of the six Marines famously photographed raising the flag at Iwo Jima, has sparked outrage and accusations of a “DEI purge.” This action, seemingly driven by an overly broad interpretation of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives, has erased a significant piece of American history and military heritage.
The webpage, previously dedicated to honoring Hayes’s contributions and sacrifices, highlighted Native American involvement in the military and beyond. Its removal is being interpreted by many as a deliberate attempt to whitewash history, diminishing the contributions of people of color and perpetuating a skewed narrative of American history.… Continue reading
The US Department of Defense webpage honoring Medal of Honor recipient Maj. Gen. Charles Calvin Rogers was temporarily removed and its URL altered to include “DEI,” prompting public outcry. The page’s removal occurred during an automated process, according to the department. Following the controversy, the webpage was restored to its original form, with the added “DEI” removed from the URL. This incident coincided with the Trump administration’s ongoing efforts to roll back diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives within the federal government.
Read More
A federal judge has ruled that the Pentagon selectively used studies to justify its ban on transgender service members. This decision highlights concerns about the methodology and motivations behind the policy. The judge’s finding suggests a deliberate effort to support a predetermined conclusion, rather than a fair and impartial assessment of the evidence. It calls into question the integrity of the process used to formulate the policy and raises serious questions about the fairness and equity of the military’s approach to transgender individuals.
The sheer volume of questionable choices made in supporting this ban is staggering. The selective use of data appears to be a deliberate tactic, cherry-picking information that bolsters a pre-existing bias against transgender individuals while ignoring or downplaying contradictory evidence.… Continue reading
The US military recently canceled a series of climate change studies, a move described by the Pentagon chief as eliminating “crap.” This decision is baffling, given the overwhelming scientific consensus on climate change and its profound implications for national security. It seems incredibly short-sighted to dismiss research that could be crucial in preparing the military for the very real challenges posed by a changing climate.
The Pentagon itself has, for years, acknowledged climate change as a major threat. The potential consequences are far-reaching and deeply concerning. Changes in weather patterns directly impact agricultural output, leading to food shortages and price hikes, triggering civil unrest and potentially even regime collapse – a pattern observed in various regions, including Syria.… Continue reading
The Department of Defense is purging its online content of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) materials, as per a Trump administration executive order. A database reveals over 26,000 images flagged for removal, potentially reaching 100,000, impacting photos of notable milestones and historical figures, including those related to women, minorities, and LGBTQ+ individuals. The process has caused significant confusion, with images deleted due to seemingly arbitrary reasons like filenames containing the word “gay.” While some historically significant content may be preserved, the long-term preservation of the removed material remains unclear.
Read More
The Department of Defense, following President Trump’s executive order, is purging its online content of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) materials. A database reveals over 26,000 flagged images, with the potential total reaching 100,000, encompassing photos of notable figures like a World War II Medal of Honor recipient and the Enola Gay. The purge disproportionately affects content featuring women and minorities, even impacting historically significant materials, though some images remain. This action, while aiming for rapid compliance, has led to confusion and inconsistent application of the directive across different branches of the military.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood