Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth used a “dirty” internet line in his Pentagon office to access the Signal messaging app on a personal computer, bypassing security protocols. This unsecured connection, while used in other Pentagon offices for specific purposes, exposed Hegseth to potential hacking and surveillance, raising concerns about the potential compromise of sensitive defense information. Hegseth’s actions are under investigation by the Defense Department’s inspector general following revelations he shared details of a military airstrike via Signal in multiple group chats. Despite the Pentagon offering secure communication channels, Hegseth’s use of Signal and the unsecured line has generated significant controversy.
Read More
Shopping Trends operates independently from CTV News journalists. The team’s recommendations may generate affiliate commissions through provided shopping links. This information is provided for transparency. Full disclosure regarding the team’s operations can be found by following the provided link.
Read More
Despite prohibitions against personal electronic devices in classified areas, Hegseth used Signal on a Pentagon office computer, circumventing security protocols. This practice, potentially extending to his chief of staff, raises concerns about compliance with message preservation laws, given Signal’s disappearing message feature. Hegseth’s spokesperson denies current use, yet sources confirm past installation. The use was ostensibly for sending text messages from a computer.
Read More
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth shared classified information about planned Yemen airstrikes with a private Signal group chat including family and friends, in addition to an official group. This second group contained approximately a dozen individuals, including two recently fired senior advisors accused of leaking information. Hegseth’s actions, involving the use of a personal phone, are sparking further criticism of his leadership at the Pentagon. The revelation adds to concerns surrounding his management of sensitive information and raises questions about the necessity of his family and friends possessing such classified details.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker