Arizona Representative Abe Hamadeh has requested a federal investigation into Runbeck Election Services, alleging improper handling of ballots in multiple western states during the 2024 election. His letter to Attorney General Pam Bondi cites credible reports of blank ballots being improperly mixed with returned ballots at a Runbeck warehouse, raising concerns about election integrity. The request seeks to determine if security protocols were followed and the potential impact on election results. The DOJ has yet to respond, while concerns regarding election integrity persist following the closely contested 2024 presidential election.
Read More
Over seventy legal experts and three organizations filed an ethics complaint with the Florida Bar against Attorney General Pam Bondi, alleging serious professional misconduct. The complaint cites Bondi’s actions, including issuing a memorandum compelling DOJ lawyers to violate ethical obligations under the guise of “zealous advocacy,” leading to the dismissal or resignation of several employees. This alleged misconduct, exemplified by three specific cases, is argued to prioritize political objectives over ethical conduct and legal norms. The Florida Bar has previously dismissed similar complaints, citing its inability to investigate sitting federal officials, a decision the coalition challenges. Despite a DOJ spokesperson’s dismissal of the complaint, the coalition maintains that Bondi’s actions warrant investigation and sanctions.
Read More
A Florida Bar ethics complaint accuses Attorney General Pam Bondi of pressuring Department of Justice lawyers to prioritize President Trump’s political agenda over ethical obligations, citing three instances where staff were allegedly coerced into actions against their professional judgment. These incidents involved the firing of an immigration attorney, the resignation of a prosecutor, and the dismissal of senior prosecutors resisting the dropping of charges. The complaint alleges Bondi’s actions constitute a misuse of authority and a politicization of the Justice Department. While Bondi’s office dismissed the complaint as partisan, the Florida Bar has yet to respond.
Read More
This week marked somber anniversaries: the collapse of the Tallahatchie Bridge, the assassination of Robert F. Kennedy, and the D-Day landings. An ethics complaint against Florida Attorney General Bondi was dismissed, prompting a dismissive response from the Department of Justice. Boston Mayor Michelle Wu’s stance against federal immigration enforcement garnered both praise and criticism. Finally, archaeological discoveries in Peru expanded understanding of the Chachapoya civilization.
Read More
Congressman Goldman’s letter to Attorney General Bondi demands the unredacted release of the Epstein files, citing a significant delay in their promised release. The letter alleges that this delay, coupled with reports of FBI agents working overtime to redact information, raises concerns about potential White House intervention to protect President Trump. Goldman questions whether the redactions are intended to conceal Trump’s potentially incriminating involvement with Epstein. The Congressman requests a detailed explanation for the delay and confirmation of whether the President or his staff attempted to influence the release of the files.
Read More
Attorney General Pam Bondi ended the American Bar Association’s (ABA) access to nonpublic information on President Trump’s judicial nominees, citing the ABA’s perceived bias toward Democratic administrations and its function as an “activist group.” This decision prevents nominees from providing waivers for the ABA’s access to information, responding to questionnaires, or participating in interviews. The move follows past conservative criticisms of the ABA’s ratings, with previous presidents altering the organization’s role in the nomination process. This action comes despite the ABA’s long history as a nonpartisan organization that evaluates nominees’ qualifications.
Read More
ProPublica’s investigation reveals that over a dozen Trump administration officials, including Attorney General Pam Bondi, strategically divested themselves of substantial stock holdings shortly before President Trump’s “Liberation Day” tariffs negatively impacted the market. These preemptive sales, totaling millions of dollars, occurred within days of the market downturn, with some officials repurchasing shares at reduced prices afterward. Examples include a State Department official’s $50,000 sale and Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy’s sale of shares in nearly 36 companies. This pattern raises concerns about potential insider trading.
Read More
Attorney General Pam Bondi sold between $1 million and $5 million in Trump Media & Technology Group shares on April 2nd, the same day President Trump announced sweeping tariffs. This occurred on “Liberation Day,” when tariffs caused market drops, followed by a 90-day pause. While there is no suggestion of wrongdoing, the timing of the sale, falling within Bondi’s 90-day window to divest from Trump Media per her ethics agreement, and subsequent stock price fluctuations warrant attention. Bondi’s actions are subject to scrutiny, alongside other aspects of her career, including her past lobbying work for Qatar.
Read More
Attorney General Pam Bondi sold between $1 million and $5 million in Trump Media shares on April 2nd, the same day President Trump announced new tariffs that caused a market downturn. Bondi’s disclosure forms don’t specify the exact time of sale, but the transactions occurred before or after the market closed following Trump’s press conference. While the legality of the sale is unclear, it raises questions regarding potential insider trading, given Bondi’s prior work with Trump Media. The Justice Department has yet to comment.
Read More
The New York Times reports that Attorney General Pam Bondi’s tenure is characterized by a significant departure from the traditional independence of the Department of Justice. Instead, the White House, particularly Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller, is alleged to be directing the department’s agenda, with Bondi acting primarily as a messenger executing White House directives. This has led to criticism from both sides of the political spectrum, with some questioning her effectiveness and others defending her actions as necessary to counter a perceived “liberal” workforce. Bondi’s frequent appearances on Fox News, while boosting her profile, have also drawn criticism for prioritizing media appearances over departmental duties. Ultimately, her performance as Attorney General is viewed as highly performative and subservient to the White House.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker