Overnight clashes along the Pakistan-Afghanistan border resulted in significant casualties. The Pakistan military reported 23 of its troops killed, alongside over 200 Taliban and affiliated fighters. The fighting occurred on the Afghan side of the border. This information was released by the Pakistani military on Sunday.
Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif revealed that India launched a preemptive Brahmos missile strike on May 9-10, targeting multiple locations including Rawalpindi airport. This strike disrupted Pakistan’s planned retaliatory attack, which was scheduled for after morning prayers on May 10. Sharif admitted the Pakistani military was unprepared for the Indian assault. The attack damaged crucial infrastructure, including the Nur Khan airbase, impacting Pakistan’s air power and proximity to its nuclear arsenal. Sharif’s admission, made during a trip to Azerbaijan, is notable for its contrast to previous pronouncements and the timing in the presence of newly-promoted Field Marshal Gen Asim Munir.
General Asim Munir’s promotion to field marshal, the first in nearly 60 years, recognizes his exceptional leadership during recent heightened tensions with India. This five-star rank, primarily ceremonial, signifies extraordinary wartime achievement and national security contributions. The cabinet also extended Air Marshal Zaheer Ahmed Babar Sidhu’s service. While Munir remains army chief, the implications of his new, lifetime rank regarding retirement remain unclear.
The Pakistan army’s announcement of 51 military deaths in a conflict with India is a significant event, particularly considering Pakistan’s historical reluctance to acknowledge casualties. This openness, however unusual, presents a stark contrast to past practices. The official figure, however, is likely a considerable understatement of the true loss of life. Many believe the actual number of Pakistani military personnel killed is significantly higher, possibly double or even triple the reported figure. This skepticism stems from Pakistan’s past record of downplaying its military losses.
The issue of civilian casualties further complicates the matter. The comments suggest a significant number of civilian deaths, possibly exceeding military losses, with estimates ranging from 100 to 200.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood