The Shopping Trends team has identified a commission-based relationship with links used for shopping. This team operates independently from CTV News journalists. Readers should be aware that purchases made through these links may generate revenue for the team. Further information about the team’s practices can be found within the article.
The Finnish Parliament overwhelmingly approved (157-18) the withdrawal from the Ottawa Treaty banning anti-personnel landmines, enabling Finland to resume their use. Opposition came primarily from the Left Alliance (10 MPs), Greens (7 MPs), and one member of the ruling coalition. This decision follows similar actions by Baltic states and reflects Finland’s reassessment of its defense capabilities in a changing security environment. The next steps involve presidential confirmation and notification to the UN.
Finland’s planned withdrawal from the Ottawa Treaty banning anti-personnel landmines is a significant development, sparking considerable debate. The move follows a similar trend among several other European nations, all citing the escalating threat posed by Russia as the primary justification. This decision reflects a stark shift in security priorities, prioritizing immediate defense needs over international agreements.
The rationale behind Finland’s action centers on the perceived necessity to bolster its defenses against potential Russian aggression. With the ongoing conflict in Ukraine, fears of further expansionism have intensified, leading to a reevaluation of traditional security doctrines. The deployment of landmines along borders with Russia, Ukraine, and Belarus is viewed by some as a necessary deterrent, a measure to create a buffer zone and protect national territory.… Continue reading
The United States will provide Ukraine with anti-personnel landmines, despite their controversial nature and international ban under the Ottawa Treaty. These “non-persistent” mines are designed to become inert after a set time, mitigating some risks, though concerns remain regarding civilian harm during their active period. While the US and Russia are not signatories to the treaty, Ukraine’s potential withdrawal is also being considered due to military necessity. The provision of these mines marks a significant escalation in military aid to Ukraine.
President Biden’s recent approval of antipersonnel mines for Ukraine marks a significant shift in US policy, reversing a long-standing stance against these controversial weapons. This decision, while intended to bolster Ukraine’s defense against the ongoing Russian invasion, has sparked considerable debate and criticism. The justification centers around the dire circumstances on the ground, where Ukraine faces a relentless onslaught and needs every advantage to defend its territory.
The argument for providing these mines highlights the escalating nature of the conflict. Russia’s use of drones dropping petal mines over Ukrainian positions underscores the already brutal reality of the war. The assertion is made that if Ukraine chooses to employ these weapons to protect itself, it should have the option to do so, particularly given the extensive demining efforts that will be required regardless of the outcome of the war.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood