The United States will provide Ukraine with anti-personnel landmines, despite their controversial nature and international ban under the Ottawa Treaty. These “non-persistent” mines are designed to become inert after a set time, mitigating some risks, though concerns remain regarding civilian harm during their active period. While the US and Russia are not signatories to the treaty, Ukraine’s potential withdrawal is also being considered due to military necessity. The provision of these mines marks a significant escalation in military aid to Ukraine.
Read More
President Biden’s recent approval of antipersonnel mines for Ukraine marks a significant shift in US policy, reversing a long-standing stance against these controversial weapons. This decision, while intended to bolster Ukraine’s defense against the ongoing Russian invasion, has sparked considerable debate and criticism. The justification centers around the dire circumstances on the ground, where Ukraine faces a relentless onslaught and needs every advantage to defend its territory.
The argument for providing these mines highlights the escalating nature of the conflict. Russia’s use of drones dropping petal mines over Ukrainian positions underscores the already brutal reality of the war. The assertion is made that if Ukraine chooses to employ these weapons to protect itself, it should have the option to do so, particularly given the extensive demining efforts that will be required regardless of the outcome of the war.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood