Energy Dept. adds ‘climate change’ and ‘emissions’ to banned words list. That’s a sentence that probably made a lot of people’s stomachs drop. It’s the kind of headline that sparks immediate concern, and frankly, outrage, because it signifies a deliberate attempt to rewrite reality. It’s not just about semantics; it’s about controlling the narrative, silencing scientific inquiry, and, as some would argue, actively accelerating a global crisis. The notion that a government agency, particularly one focused on energy, would ban the very terms that define the core of its work, is deeply unsettling. It’s like a doctor refusing to use the word “disease.”… Continue reading
In a recent interview, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth stated the Department of Defense’s new secondary title, “Department of War,” is meant to signal a desire for peace. President Trump signed an executive order to add the title, but Congressional approval is required for the formal renaming. Critics, including Senator Rand Paul, have already condemned the department’s actions, specifically the recent destruction of a Venezuelan boat, raising concerns about the department’s motivations. The new title and Hegseth’s explanation have drawn comparisons to George Orwell’s novel *1984* and other works.
Read More
By providing an email address and clicking “Sign Up,” users consent to receive personalized marketing communications from the company and its advertising partners. This action also signifies agreement with the company’s Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. These agreements outline the terms of service and how user data is collected, used, and protected. Users are advised to review these legal documents before submitting their information. Therefore, users should be aware of these terms and policies before signing up.
Read More
We are all living in George Orwell’s world now, or at least, aspects of it feel disturbingly familiar. The ease with which misinformation spreads, the manipulation of language to control narratives, and the erosion of trust in institutions all echo themes from *Nineteen Eighty-Four*. The constant surveillance through our readily carried smartphones, voluntarily offering up vast amounts of personal data, surpasses even Orwell’s imagined telescreens in its scope and pervasiveness. We willingly carry these digital panopticons, far surpassing the involuntary nature of Orwell’s vision. The addictive nature of these devices, a detail Orwell missed, only amplifies their power to shape our thoughts and behaviors.… Continue reading
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker