Negotiations between the U.S. and Ukraine over a revised minerals deal are ongoing, following President Zelensky’s rejection of an initial proposal demanding a 50% stake in Ukrainian resources. The U.S. has threatened to cut off Ukraine’s access to crucial Starlink internet service if a deal isn’t reached, a move described as devastating to Ukraine’s war effort. This threat, delivered through various U.S. officials, including Special Envoy Keith Kellogg, followed President Trump’s public criticism of Zelensky and assertions of a near-complete agreement on a resource deal. The specific terms of the revised agreement remain undisclosed, but Trump claims it benefits both nations.
Read More
Despite claims by Donald Trump and Mike Waltz of an imminent deal, Ukrainian President Zelenskyy refuses to sign a US-proposed minerals agreement. The draft agreement, which would grant the US access to Ukraine’s natural resources in exchange for weapons, is viewed by Ukraine as problematic due to its perceived unilateral nature and lack of true partnership. Concerns exist that the US may leverage Ukraine’s reliance on Starlink internet access to pressure a deal. Zelenskyy maintains his commitment to only accepting agreements that fully involve Ukraine.
Read More
The US government’s potential decision to cut off Ukraine’s access to Starlink internet services in exchange for minerals feels like a dramatic shift in strategy. One moment, unwavering support is pledged, the next, vital services are dangled as leverage in a seemingly transactional power play. This abrupt change leaves many questioning the underlying motives and the ethical implications of such a drastic move.
The suggestion that the US would condition continued support on Ukraine supplying minerals evokes strong reactions. It appears to many as blatant blackmail, reminiscent of outdated geopolitical tactics. The perception that a country, particularly one facing ongoing conflict, could be subjected to such pressure raises serious concerns about the potential for coercion and exploitation.… Continue reading
Negotiations for SpaceX’s Starlink license in South Africa have stalled due to strained US-South Africa relations, stemming from Elon Musk’s criticism of South African ownership laws. SpaceX’s request for “equity equivalents” instead of a mandatory 30% stake in its South African operations, aimed at circumventing black economic empowerment regulations, has further complicated matters. This follows SpaceX’s withdrawal from public hearings and President Ramaphosa’s spokesperson stating that South Africa won’t pursue Starlink’s investment at any cost. SpaceX argues that the current regulations exclude many foreign satellite operators, hindering foreign investment and competition.
Read More
A Wall Street Journal report reveals a previously undisclosed, two-year communication channel between Elon Musk and Vladimir Putin, encompassing personal and geopolitical discussions. These conversations included a Russian request to Musk to limit Starlink service over Taiwan, highlighting significant national security implications given Musk’s roles in the US space program, SpaceX, and X (formerly Twitter). Musk’s close ties to the Trump campaign further amplify concerns, especially given potential future governmental roles for Musk. The situation has drawn comparisons to Russia’s post-Soviet oligarchic era, raising fears of undue influence and potential regulatory favors.
Read More
Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) is aggressively targeting USAID, potentially leading to its dissolution. This action coincides with an ongoing USAID inspector general investigation into a public-private partnership between Musk’s Starlink and Ukraine. Multiple federal agencies have expressed concerns about the legality of DOGE’s actions, which are facing lawsuits alleging violations of federal privacy laws. The situation highlights the complex interplay between Musk’s attacks on USAID, the ongoing Starlink investigation, and potential legal ramifications for DOGE.
Read More
Doug Ford’s initial plan to cancel Ontario’s $100 million Starlink contract in response to potential US tariffs was swiftly reversed following a temporary suspension of those tariffs. The cancellation, announced as a retaliatory measure, was intended to provide high-speed internet to rural areas but was quickly put on hold when the tariff threat was paused. With the temporary reprieve, the Starlink contract will proceed, though the PCs have stated they may still cancel it if tariffs are reinstated. The Ontario Liberals, however, continue to advocate for the contract’s termination, criticizing both the deal itself and Musk’s close ties to President Trump.
Read More
Following a 30-day postponement of U.S. tariffs negotiated by Prime Minister Trudeau, Ontario has paused its retaliatory measures. These measures included removing U.S. alcohol from LCBO shelves and cancelling a $100 million Starlink internet deal. While the retaliatory actions are temporarily suspended, Premier Ford warned they could be reinstated if tariffs are implemented. The pause allows for further negotiations and underscores the precarious nature of the Canada-U.S. trade relationship.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood