Britain’s data watchdog has fined Reddit £14.5 million for failing to adequately protect children’s personal data and for not conducting a required risk assessment before January 2025. The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) found that the platform unlawfully collected and used the personal information of children under 13, potentially exposing them to harmful content. While Reddit prohibits users under 13, it lacked age verification measures until July 2025, leading to children’s data being processed without their understanding or consent. The company intends to appeal this decision, which stems from an investigation launched in March 2025 into Reddit’s age assurance and data usage practices.
Read More
Spain’s Prime Minister, Pedro Sanchez, has signaled a firm stance against the influence of tech oligarchs, particularly regarding potential social media bans. His government appears resolute in its pursuit of regulations, even if it draws criticism from powerful tech figures and their allies. This position suggests a prioritization of what the government perceives as societal well-being, particularly for younger citizens, over the unfettered operations of major technology companies. The notion that “the world needs to say ‘NO’ to the tech bros far more often” encapsulates a broader sentiment that, in matters of public good and democratic principles, the interests of the people and open-source values should outweigh those of billionaires, hyper-capitalist surveillance systems, and the enforcement of “might makes right” politics.… Continue reading
Spain’s proposed ban on social media access for individuals under 16 is a significant development, prompting a wave of discussion and varied opinions on its potential effectiveness and implications. The core idea, while seemingly aimed at protecting younger users, raises immediate questions about how such a ban would be practically enforced and what exactly constitutes “social media” in this digital age. There’s a genuine concern about the invasiveness of any age verification system, and how securely personal data would be handled when submitting identification to prove age, leading to anxieties about privacy and potential misuse.
The definition of social media itself is a key point of contention; does it encompass platforms like YouTube or Steam, which have social features, or is it limited to a specific set of established sites like Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter?… Continue reading
Meta sparked controversy by using back-to-school photos of young schoolgirls in targeted advertisements for its Threads platform, specifically shown to a 37-year-old man. These images, sourced from parents’ public Instagram posts, were repurposed without explicit consent, prompting outrage from parents who felt the practice was exploitative and potentially sexualized. Meta defended its actions, stating the images didn’t violate its policies and were part of its recommendation system, but the targeted advertising to a specific demographic raised concerns about children’s online safety and privacy. Critics, including a crossbench peer, condemned Meta’s prioritization of profit over child safety, urging regulatory bodies like Ofcom to address the issue.
Read More
The Supreme Court has sided with Texas in the case of *Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton*, upholding a law requiring age verification for adult websites. The court ruled that the First Amendment does not protect the right of adults to access content deemed obscene for minors without first providing proof of age, opening the door for similar age-gating measures nationwide. This decision, reached with a 6-3 majority, effectively revisits a 2004 ruling and attributes the change to advances in technology. The ruling highlights the absence of a strict scrutiny standard for age verification, potentially affecting privacy.
Read More
Australia is considering a new bill that would ban social media use for children under the age of 16. This proposal has sparked significant debate, with concerns raised about its effectiveness, potential for unintended consequences, and the underlying motivations behind it.
The government’s stated aim is to protect children from the harmful effects of social media. Many believe that exposure to online negativity, cyberbullying, and inappropriate content poses significant risks to the mental and emotional well-being of young people. The argument presented is that a complete ban, until a certain age, offers the best protection.
However, critics argue that a ban is impractical and unenforceable.… Continue reading
Australia’s House of Representatives passed a bill imposing a world-first ban on children under 16 using social media, with platforms facing substantial fines for non-compliance. The legislation, supported by major parties, includes provisions to protect user privacy by prohibiting the demand for government-issued identification. While critics raised concerns about the bill’s effectiveness, rushed passage, and potential negative consequences, supporters argue it’s a crucial step towards safeguarding children online. The bill now proceeds to the Senate for final approval, where its passage is considered highly likely.
Read More
As a resident of Spain, I cannot help but feel frustrated and concerned with the recent introduction of the porn passport system. The idea of having to verify my age and receive “porn credits” just to access adult content online seems absurd and invasive. Not to mention, the potential implications of this system on privacy and censorship are alarming.
While I understand the intention behind the introduction of this system is to protect children from accessing inappropriate content, I cannot help but question its effectiveness. In an age where technology is evolving rapidly, kids are becoming increasingly tech-savvy. They will find ways around these age verification measures, whether it’s through VPNs or other means.… Continue reading
As I sit here and reflect on the recent news about the adult entertainment industry suing again over a law requiring pornographic sites to verify users’ ages, I can’t help but feel a sense of frustration and confusion. The idea of having to upload personal identification to access adult websites raises many concerns, especially in a world where online privacy seems to be diminishing more and more each day.
The arguments presented by some individuals about the potential risks of sharing personal information on these sites are valid. Why should anyone have to provide their ID, especially if they are trying to maintain a level of privacy or if they are in a situation where revealing such information could have negative consequences?… Continue reading
As an attorney, I understand the importance of privacy and confidentiality, especially when it comes to personal data. So, when I came across the news of an attorney who saw her library reading habits reflected in mobile ads, it struck a chord with me. The idea of my private reading preferences being exposed to advertisers without my consent is unsettling, to say the least.
In today’s digital age, where our every move online is being tracked and monitored for targeted advertising, it’s concerning to see just how integrated our personal data has become. The concept of “listening” to our conversations or tracking our browsing habits goes beyond what many of us would consider acceptable.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood