A Manhattan jury found Nadine Menendez guilty on all 15 counts, including bribery and obstruction of justice, concluding a three-week trial. The verdict stems from a five-year bribery scheme in which prosecutors allege she and her husband, former Senator Bob Menendez, accepted bribes including cash, gold bars, and a luxury car from three New Jersey businessmen in exchange for political favors. The prosecution argued that Nadine Menendez actively participated in the scheme, while the defense contended that some of the received items were gifts, not bribes. Nadine Menendez’s sentencing is scheduled for June 12th, coinciding with her husband’s prison sentence commencement.
Read More
Signal chat records must be preserved, a federal judge has ordered the Trump administration. This isn’t just about one specific conversation; it’s about a broader pattern of behavior that raises serious questions about accountability and the rule of law. The judge’s order underscores the gravity of the situation, highlighting the potential for the administration to deliberately obstruct justice by deleting evidence.
Signal chat records must be preserved, the judge insists, because they are potentially relevant to ongoing legal proceedings. The fact that the administration might have used a platform like Signal, known for its end-to-end encryption and disappearing messages, suggests a conscious effort to evade official record-keeping and oversight.… Continue reading
In a lawsuit filed by American Oversight, the Trump administration is accused of using a Signal group chat, including cabinet members and Vice President Vance, to discuss a potential Yemen attack. The administration denies discussing classified information, attributing the incident to a low-level employee. Judge Boasberg, previously involved in legal battles with Trump, will now oversee discovery in this case. Trump’s past social media attacks against Judge Boasberg suggest strong negative feelings towards the judge’s involvement.
Read More
Following a directive from Acting Executive Secretary Erica Carr, USAID employees were ordered to destroy classified documents and personnel records, shredding as much as possible before resorting to incineration. This action comes amidst legal challenges to the Trump administration’s dismantling of USAID, with critics arguing the document destruction hinders ongoing litigation regarding employee terminations and grant cessations. A federal judge has already ordered the administration to pay USAID contractors, highlighting the controversy surrounding the agency’s closure. The document destruction is raising concerns about the administration’s efforts to erase federal records and obstruct legal proceedings.
Read More
Labor groups are suing the Trump administration, alleging the destruction of USAID employee documents, including classified and personnel files, is underway. This alleged destruction, directed via email by a USAID official, is occurring despite ongoing litigation challenging unlawful employee firings. The unions argue this document destruction will irreparably harm their ability to reinstate wrongfully terminated employees. A temporary restraining order is sought to halt the document destruction, which the plaintiffs contend is a large-scale effort to eliminate critical data. The judge has yet to rule on this latest motion.
Read More
President Trump ordered the suspension of security clearances for Covington & Burling lawyers who provided pro bono legal services to Special Counsel Jack Smith. This action, part of Trump’s broader campaign of retribution against those involved in investigating him, targets the firm despite their assertion that they only represented Smith personally. The memo, directed at Attorney General Pam Bondi, cites concerns about the “weaponization of the judicial process,” echoing Republican claims of partisan bias within the Justice Department. This follows previous attempts by Trump to revoke clearances from perceived political opponents.
Read More
Donald Trump’s attacks on the Associated Press stem from the news organization’s reporting on his classified documents case. The AP’s coverage, deemed critical by Trump, highlights his potential mishandling of sensitive materials and obstruction of justice. This aggressive response reflects a broader pattern of Trump targeting media outlets perceived as adversarial to his interests. Ultimately, his public condemnation aims to discredit the AP’s reporting and undermine its credibility. These actions represent a continuation of his efforts to control the narrative surrounding his legal challenges.
Read More
Former ICE Acting Director Tom Homan is urging the Department of Justice to investigate Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez for potentially obstructing justice by informing immigrants of their rights during ICE encounters. Homan claims Ocasio-Cortez’s actions might be construed as impeding law enforcement, a claim she denies, asserting her actions constitute civil education and ensuring compliance with existing laws. He contends that her actions aid immigrants in evading arrest, even with warrants. Ocasio-Cortez maintains she is simply informing individuals of their constitutional rights and the limits of ICE authority.
Read More
Acting Attorney General James McHenry terminated several Department of Justice employees involved in the prosecution of Donald Trump, citing a lack of trust in their ability to support the President’s agenda. The dismissed officials, including career prosecutors Molly Gaston, J.P. Cooney, Anne McNamara, and Mary Dohrmann, worked on Special Counsel Jack Smith’s investigations into Trump’s handling of classified documents and attempts to overturn the 2020 election. This action has been criticized as anti-rule of law and anti-democratic, with legal experts noting that career civil servants are entitled to due process and cannot be summarily dismissed. The firings are purportedly part of an effort to end the “weaponization of government.”
Read More
Special Counsel Jack Smith’s report, released Tuesday, details irrefutable evidence of a criminal scheme by Donald Trump to overturn the 2020 election. The report, based on extensive witness testimony and investigation, reveals Trump’s awareness of the falsity of his fraud claims and his efforts to obstruct justice through witness intimidation and executive privilege. Rep. Jamie Raskin highlighted the report’s findings, emphasizing Trump’s months-long plot to subvert election results and the House Republicans’ role in hindering accountability. Despite the Justice Department’s decision to drop the case, the report underscores the gravity of Trump’s actions.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood