Although the initial portion of Cruz’s statement echoed familiar Republican rhetoric, the latter part offered a more nuanced perspective. Cruz highlighted the considerable mobilization and anger on the left, emphasizing that such factors significantly influence election outcomes. He cautioned that complacency among Republican voters, coupled with increased fundraising and enthusiasm within the Democratic party, could lead to unfavorable results in the upcoming midterms. Despite potentially misrepresenting the Democrats, Cruz’s remarks indicate the GOP is taking notice of the large-scale “No Kings” rallies and the overall political energy.
Read More
A Louisiana judge has ordered the return of electronics seized from former priest Travis Clark, who pleaded guilty to obscenity. As a precaution against the videos becoming public, the judge also mandated the erasure of all data from the devices. The case involved Clark and two dominatrices, where videos of their encounter on a church altar were taken. The videos depicted several disturbing acts including urination into a communion chalice, which is one of the many details known about them. Clark served jail time after violating probation, and the dominatrices pleaded guilty to misdemeanor charges as well.
Read More
A Republican bill, the Interstate Obscenity Definition Act (IODA), is moving forward in the Senate, aiming to ban pornography federally. The bill, championed by Senator Mike Lee, redefines obscenity by removing the “community standards” benchmark and labeling all pornographic content as illegal, contrary to the current Miller Test established in 1973. This effort aligns with Project 2025, a conservative document advocating for a ban on pornography and equating it with transgender ideology and the sexualization of children. Despite previous unsuccessful attempts, this is the third time the IODA has been introduced, though its passage remains uncertain.
Read More
Senator Mike Lee’s Interstate Obscenity Definition Act (IODA), which seeks to criminalize all pornography, has moved to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. The bill redefines “obscenity” and could potentially criminalize content that appeals to prurient interests. Critics have raised concerns that the broad definition could encompass various media and have unintended consequences, including impacting adult content creators and even seemingly innocuous media. The bill is similar to a proposed pornography ban outlined in the Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025.
Read More
Senator Mike Lee’s Interstate Obscenity Definition Act seeks to redefine obscenity under federal law, effectively banning pornography. The bill aims to circumvent the 1973 Miller Test, arguing its vagueness allows widespread distribution of explicit material, including to children. By updating the legal definition for the digital age, the act intends to facilitate the removal of such content and prosecution of distributors. This legislation represents a significant attempt to regulate online pornography at the national level.
Read More
The Interstate Obscenity Definition Act, introduced by Senator Mike Lee and Representative Mary Miller, aims to create a consistent nationwide definition of obscenity to combat the spread of explicit content online. The bill updates the outdated legal definition of obscenity, clarifying standards for prosecuting the transmission of such material across state lines. This modernized definition removes ambiguities in current law, offering law enforcement clearer tools to identify and remove obscene content. By establishing consistent criteria, the act seeks to prevent criminals from exploiting differing state definitions to evade prosecution.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker