Nuclear weapons must never be used, a Nagasaki survivor implored, his words echoing a sentiment that transcends time and geopolitical maneuvering. His plea, delivered in the shadow of a Nobel ceremony, served as a stark reminder of the catastrophic consequences of nuclear warfare, a consequence he intimately understands. His experience, a living testament to the horrors inflicted by these weapons, should resonate far beyond the confines of personal tragedy. It’s a history lesson etched in flesh and bone, far more impactful than any paragraph in a history book.
The sheer weight of his lived experience should compel leaders, especially those wielding nuclear power, to contemplate the profound human cost.… Continue reading
In 1994, Ukraine relinquished its substantial nuclear arsenal in exchange for security guarantees from the U.S., U.K., and Russia under the Budapest Memorandum. Russia’s subsequent invasion of Ukraine demonstrates a blatant disregard for these guarantees, leaving Ukraine vulnerable and highlighting the agreement’s failure to provide promised security. Experts debate the wisdom of Ukraine’s disarmament, with some arguing that retaining nuclear weapons would have served as a stronger deterrent, while others emphasize the practical and political challenges of such a path. The Budapest Memorandum’s failure continues to shape Ukrainian security policy and fuels ongoing discussions about the country’s future relationship with nuclear weapons and international alliances.
Read More
Zelenskyy’s stark assertion that Ukraine gave away its nuclear weapons and was met with a brutal invasion in return resonates deeply with many who feel the weight of history. Reflecting on this reality, I find it impossible to ignore the critical lesson that emerges from this situation: the folly of unilateral disarmament when surrounded by aggressors. The decision made in the early 1990s to relinquish nuclear arms in exchange for vague assurances now stands as a cautionary tale for nations worldwide. Ukraine’s situation has fundamentally altered our understanding of security and deterrence in international relations.
The context in which Ukraine divested itself of these powerful weapons must be considered.… Continue reading
The recent announcement of the Japanese atomic bomb survivors winning the Nobel Peace Prize has sparked a range of emotions and reflections within me. This recognition serves as a poignant reminder of the horrors of nuclear war and the importance of advocating for peace in our world. The Nobel Committee’s decision to award Nihon Hidankyo, a Japanese organisation of atomic bomb survivors, highlights the extraordinary efforts made by this group to foster a world free of nuclear weapons. It is a powerful statement that resonates deeply with me, echoing the sentiment that the devastation caused by nuclear weapons must never be forgotten.… Continue reading
Israel’s recent bold offer in the ongoing conflict with Hamas, proposing to end the war and allow Hamas leader Sinwar to leave if all hostages are freed at once and Gaza disarmed, is a significant step towards achieving lasting peace in the region. This offer, if accepted, could potentially lead to a breakthrough in the conflict that has plagued the area for far too long.
The fact that Hamas swiftly rejected this offer speaks volumes about their true intentions. It is clear that Hamas thrives on perpetuating conflict and maintaining their stranglehold on Gaza for their gain. The billions of dollars they make from controlling the region highlight their vested interest in keeping the status quo rather than working towards peace and prosperity for the residents of Gaza.… Continue reading
I am genuinely concerned about the recent news that China has declined to meet with the US on nuclear arms control. In a world where the threat of nuclear warfare looms large, it is essential for major powers to come together and negotiate agreements that promote peace and security. The fact that China has chosen to forgo these discussions is troubling, to say the least.
One cannot help but wonder why China would turn down the opportunity to engage in talks that could potentially reduce the risk of conflict and promote global stability. The US officials had proposed common-sense steps aimed at addressing the fundamental risks of conflict and uncontrolled escalation in the nuclear and space domains.… Continue reading
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker