Nuclear weapons must never be used, a Nagasaki survivor implored, his words echoing a sentiment that transcends time and geopolitical maneuvering. His plea, delivered in the shadow of a Nobel ceremony, served as a stark reminder of the catastrophic consequences of nuclear warfare, a consequence he intimately understands. His experience, a living testament to the horrors inflicted by these weapons, should resonate far beyond the confines of personal tragedy. It’s a history lesson etched in flesh and bone, far more impactful than any paragraph in a history book.
The sheer weight of his lived experience should compel leaders, especially those wielding nuclear power, to contemplate the profound human cost.… Continue reading
This website is an official U.S. government site. Secure .gov websites use HTTPS, indicated by a lock icon in the browser and “https” at the beginning of the address. Information found here is subject to U.S. government policies and guidelines. The site’s purpose is to provide accurate and reliable information. Look for a seal or other official indicators to confirm authenticity.
Read More
Zelenskyy’s stark assertion that Ukraine gave away its nuclear weapons and was met with a brutal invasion in return resonates deeply with many who feel the weight of history. Reflecting on this reality, I find it impossible to ignore the critical lesson that emerges from this situation: the folly of unilateral disarmament when surrounded by aggressors. The decision made in the early 1990s to relinquish nuclear arms in exchange for vague assurances now stands as a cautionary tale for nations worldwide. Ukraine’s situation has fundamentally altered our understanding of security and deterrence in international relations.
The context in which Ukraine divested itself of these powerful weapons must be considered.… Continue reading
It’s a chilling thought to consider the power that a single individual holds when it comes to nuclear weapons. The recent remarks made by Zelensky about Putin being ‘afraid’ to use nuclear weapons because he ‘loves his life’ bring to light a crucial aspect of international relations and nuclear deterrence. The notion of a nuclear taboo, the fundamental understanding that using nuclear weapons equates to a form of suicidal ideation, is a sobering reminder of the stakes involved in such decisions.
Putin’s reluctance to use nuclear weapons is not necessarily rooted in a concern for the well-being of his people or the global population at large, but rather in his own self-preservation.… Continue reading
Estonia, a small nation with a strong resolve, has recently signaled its readiness to take a bold stance against any potential Russian aggression by expressing its willingness to launch preemptive strikes to defend NATO. This move, although controversial, is rooted in the belief that a preemptive strike can be a defensive maneuver to deter any potential threats before they materialize into a full-fledged attack.
The General’s comments about preemptive strikes should be viewed in the context of NATO’s collective defense strategy. In the event of Russia’s plans to invade another NATO country, Estonia’s readiness to strike first can serve as a deterrent to prevent conflict and protect the alliance.… Continue reading
The recent news of the US nuclear submarine surfacing off the coast of Norway is quite a show of force. This submarine, known as the Tennessee, is equipped with up to 24 trident d5 missiles, each capable of carrying 8 w88 warheads with a yield of 475kt each. To put that into perspective, the bomb dropped on Nagasaki was only 25kt. It’s no wonder that this display of military might is being seen as a rare flex.
The timing of this surfacing couldn’t be more pointed, especially in response to the recent saber-rattling from Russia regarding nuclear preparedness. After Putin’s threats, the appearance of the Tennessee is akin to standing next to someone and yelling at them through a bullhorn.… Continue reading
The recent news of NATO considering putting nuclear weapons on standby has definitely sparked some interesting discussions. While many may feel uneasy at the thought of nuclear weapons being so readily available, the reality is that these weapons have always been on standby. The idea of nuclear deterrence is not new, and the concept of having these weapons at the ready is meant to serve as a warning to potential adversaries.
It’s clear that NATO, under the leadership of Jens Stoltenberg, is taking a firm stance in the face of growing threats from Russia and China. Stoltenberg’s call for transparency and consultation among member nations regarding nuclear weapons is a strategic move to send a direct message to those who pose a threat to the alliance.… Continue reading
As tensions continue to rise between Russia and the West over the conflict in Ukraine, the recent claim made by a Polish official alleging that the US warned Russia of strikes on Russian targets if Putin were to use nuclear weapons is not entirely surprising. The idea of Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD) has been a fundamental principle in nuclear deterrence for decades. It serves as a stark reminder of the dire consequences that would follow any escalation to the use of nuclear weapons.
The threat of nuclear war is not a new concept, but the repercussions of such actions cannot be emphasized enough.… Continue reading
As I scrolled through the latest news headlines, a particular article caught my attention – “Media: Latvia starts digging anti-tank ditch near border with Russia.” The mere mention of this development sent chills down my spine, reminding me of the precarious geopolitical situation we find ourselves in. With Putin’s threatening rhetoric looming in the background, the Baltic States must remain vigilant and prepared for any potential aggression from Russia.
The concept of deterrence is crucial when dealing with a predator like Russia. It is essential to convey the message that any hostile action will be met with resistance and consequences. The decision by Latvia to create an anti-tank ditch serves as a tangible reminder that we must be ready to defend ourselves, should the need arise.… Continue reading
Iran’s recent warning to the U.S. to stay out of any potential conflict with Israel or face attacks on American troops is a bold and provocative move. The Iranian regime seems to have forgotten history and the dire consequences of directly attacking U.S. forces. The threats being thrown around are reckless and misguided, showing a clear lack of understanding of the military might and capabilities of the United States.
It is important to remember that the U.S. has a history of responding forcefully to any attacks on its troops or interests. The Biden Administration, despite its reluctance to engage in direct conflict, would have no choice but to respond if American forces were targeted.… Continue reading
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker