Republican Judge Jefferson Griffin’s lawsuit challenges the results of North Carolina’s Supreme Court election, where he lost to Justice Allison Riggs by a narrow margin. He seeks to invalidate tens of thousands of votes due to alleged registration irregularities, a move legal experts deem an attempt at mass disenfranchisement. This action, supported by the RNC, is seen as setting a dangerous precedent for future elections, potentially undermining faith in the democratic process. The case is currently before both the state Supreme Court and the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, with significant implications for the integrity of elections nationwide.
Read More
Democrats are furious over a North Carolina court decision to discard approximately 60,000 ballots cast in the recent Supreme Court race, denouncing the move as a “rock bottom maneuver” aimed at undermining the democratic process. The sheer scale of the discarded ballots is shocking, and the implications for fair elections are deeply troubling.
This action represents a blatant attempt to influence the outcome of an election, raising serious questions about the integrity of the electoral system. The scale of the disenfranchisement is staggering, impacting tens of thousands of voters whose voices have been effectively silenced. It is a deeply disturbing development, and the outcry from Democrats reflects a profound sense of outrage and concern.… Continue reading
Following a contested North Carolina Supreme Court election, Republicans on the court temporarily blocked the certification of Democratic Justice Allison Riggs’s victory. This action, stemming from a GOP challenger’s attempt to invalidate over 60,000 votes, despite Riggs winning by 734 votes after recounts, is seen by Democrats as a blatant attempt to seize power. The move has drawn widespread criticism, with accusations of voter disenfranchisement and undermining democratic processes. The court’s actions raise concerns about the future of fair elections and the potential overturning of the election results.
Read More
The North Carolina Supreme Court, in a 5-1 decision, issued a stay preventing the certification of Democratic Justice Allison Riggs’s narrow victory over Republican Jefferson Griffin in a state Supreme Court race. This action allows the court to hear Griffin’s challenge to approximately 60,000 votes, claims which were previously rejected by the state elections board. The court’s order, prompted by a federal court’s remand of the case, sets a January 24th deadline for briefs. The lone dissenting justice argued that the stay was unwarranted and interfered with democratic processes.
Read More
Republican Judge Jefferson Griffin, trailing Democratic Justice Allison Riggs by 734 votes in a state Supreme Court election, secured a temporary stay from the GOP-controlled court preventing certification of Riggs’ win. Griffin seeks to invalidate over 60,000 votes, a move initially rejected by the state Board of Elections and a federal judge but now under review by the state Supreme Court. This action hinges on the legality of voter registrations lacking full driver’s license or partial Social Security numbers, a contested issue previously raised in a similar Republican lawsuit. Justice Anita Earls dissented, and Justice Riggs recused herself.
Read More
Following a razor-thin victory affirmed by recounts, Democratic Supreme Court Justice Allison Riggs faces a challenge to over 60,000 ballots by her Republican opponent, Jefferson Griffin. Griffin’s campaign, targeting Democratic-leaning voters disproportionately, alleges irregularities despite failing to provide evidence of ineligible voters. This challenge could be appealed to the state Supreme Court, where a Republican majority could overturn the election and solidify their partisan advantage. The outcome significantly impacts the future of North Carolina’s redistricting process and the balance of power in the state.
Read More
After a delay in counting absentee and provisional ballots, Democrat Allison Riggs has edged out Republican Jefferson Griffin by a mere 24 votes in the North Carolina Supreme Court race. This extremely narrow margin emerged following the processing of late-arriving ballots by county election boards. While county certifications are complete, several counties require additional time to finalize their counts, leaving the outcome uncertain pending further review and potential recounts. The final result will significantly impact the court’s partisan balance, currently 5-2 Republican.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood