Non-Interventionism

Trump’s Strike on Venezuelan Boat: A Potential Act of War

The U.S. military’s recent attack on a vessel in the Caribbean, resulting in the deaths of 11 people, is reminiscent of historical events used to justify interventionism in Latin America. The Trump administration claimed the operation targeted narco-trafficking, but provided ambiguous evidence, echoing the 1898 explosion of the USS Maine that led to the Spanish-American War. This action is viewed as a strategic move to project American strength, particularly in relation to Venezuela, and is supported by figures like Marco Rubio, who is seen as pushing the narrative. Critics argue this continues a pattern of using the “war on drugs” as a pretext for intervention, potentially destabilizing the region and targeting Latino communities in the U.S.

Read More

Vance Declares US Non-Intervention in India-Pakistan Conflict

Vice President Vance stated that the US will not directly intervene in the India-Pakistan conflict, deeming it outside the scope of American interests. While the US will pursue diplomatic solutions to encourage de-escalation, direct military intervention is considered impractical and inappropriate. Despite this stance, President Trump expressed a willingness to assist in ending the conflict, emphasizing the importance of maintaining positive relationships with both nations. The current situation involves escalating cross-border attacks and counterattacks, raising concerns about a broader regional war.

Read More