Donald Trump’s administration, featuring numerous billionaire appointees with a combined net worth of roughly half a trillion dollars, represents a new era of “plutocracy on steroids.” This unprecedented concentration of wealth, fueled by neoliberal policies and asset booms, contrasts with historical patterns where the wealthy were viewed with suspicion and held societal responsibilities. This new plutocracy, exemplified by the intertwining of power and money, mirrors historical parallels in Russia but differs in the lack of overt coercion to maintain loyalty. Ultimately, this system poses risks, as foreign powers could exploit the administration’s vulnerabilities by targeting the financial interests of its wealthy members.
Read More
Following the 2024 election loss, Senator Chris Murphy argued that the Democratic Party needs a significant overhaul. He criticizes the party’s adherence to neoliberalism, emphasizing the need to address the “epidemic of American unhappiness” stemming from a lack of connection and purpose, not solely economic insecurity. Murphy advocates for a “real economic populism” focusing on addressing power imbalances and simplifying messaging, rather than solely offering policy solutions. He also stresses the importance of expanding the party’s “tent” to include those with differing views on social and cultural issues, believing that engaging in dialogue is key to winning broader support.
Read More
Democratic losses in the 2024 election cannot be attributed to a simple “wokeness” narrative; the results show a closer-than-expected race driven primarily by decreased Democratic turnout, not a massive rightward shift. This lower turnout stemmed from several factors including tangible economic anxieties exacerbated by ineffective messaging on inflation and the perception of Democrats as unable or unwilling to fight for everyday Americans. Finally, a widespread belief among voters that both Democrats and Republicans are untrustworthy further hampered the Democratic campaign.
Read More
Putin’s decision to make Russia a “safe haven” for those willing to trade liberal Western ways for so-called Russian “moral values” is a perplexing notion. The idea that individuals would willingly abandon the freedoms and liberties of the West in favor of what Russia has to offer is mind-boggling. Russia, a country not immune to its own set of problems and challenges, is hardly the epitome of moral virtue and ethical superiority.
The very concept of Russian moral values seems somewhat oxymoronic given the country’s history of political repression, human rights violations, and a lack of accountability for heinous crimes. This is not to mention the ongoing issues such as the HIV/AIDS epidemic, suicide rates, and alcoholism that continue to plague the Russian population.… Continue reading
Joe gets up at 6 a.m. and fills his coffeepot with water to prepare his morning coffee. The water is clean and good because some tree-hugging liberal fought for minimum water-quality standards. With his first swallow of coffee, he takes his daily medication. His medications are safe to take because some stupid commie liberal fought to insure their safety and that they work as advertised. All but $10 of his medications are paid for by his employer’s medical plan because some liberal union workers fought their employers for paid medical insurance – now Joe gets it too.
He prepares his morning breakfast, bacon and eggs.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood