The US government will maintain indefinite control over the sales of Venezuelan oil, even as restrictions on the country’s crude are relaxed for global markets. Officials anticipate the initial sale of 30 to 50 million barrels, with revenue managed by the US to influence the Venezuelan government. Despite assertions from the White House, Venezuela’s state-run oil company claims negotiations regarding oil sales are still ongoing. While US officials intend to use the funds to stabilize Venezuela’s economy and benefit its people, some critics, like Senator Chris Murphy, have called the plan “insane” due to its control and micromanagement of Venezuela’s assets.
Read More
During a CNN interview, White House advisor Stephen Miller articulated the Trump administration’s stance on foreign policy, asserting the United States’ right to take control of other nations for its interests, particularly concerning resources. Miller’s comments, which included the view that sovereign countries do not have sovereignty if the US wants their resources, were described as “imperialistic” by Senator Bernie Sanders. The administration has set its sights on Venezuela’s oil reserves and Greenland’s untapped resources, even though Greenland is part of Denmark, a NATO ally. Danish and Greenlandic officials have strongly condemned Trump’s threats, with the Danish Prime Minister warning that an attack on another NATO country would end the alliance.
Read More
In a shocking move, the United States launched an attack on Venezuela, capturing President Nicolás Maduro and vowing to temporarily control the country. President Trump announced plans for U.S. oil companies to rebuild Venezuela’s infrastructure and secure its oil reserves. Despite the operation, which resulted in reported casualties, Venezuelan officials condemned the intervention as an act of aggression and vowed defiance. International leaders and Democrats voiced strong criticism, labeling the action as an example of American imperialism.
Read More
Russian envoy Kirill Dmitriev presented chocolate candies featuring quotes from Vladimir Putin to the United States. These quotes, including sentiments like “Russia’s borders do not end anywhere,” were shared on Dmitriev’s Instagram, signaling a continuation of dialogue. This act follows President Trump’s indication that a meeting with Putin is possible, contingent on achieving a peaceful agreement in Ukraine. Dmitriev has also denied Russian attacks on civilian targets, calling them “accidents”.
Read More
The statement, “We have to have Greenland,” preceding a high-level visit, immediately raises concerns about potential aggression. It evokes unsettling parallels to historical instances of pre-invasion rhetoric and actions. The casual nature of the statement, coupled with a lack of publicly articulated strategic justification, fuels anxieties.
The absence of any prior campaign promises regarding Greenland acquisition stands in stark contrast to the sudden and forceful assertion of ownership. This lack of transparency raises questions about the underlying motivations and the true implications of such a bold claim.
The reasons often cited for wanting Greenland are vague and lack concrete detail. While strategic military positioning and resource acquisition are occasionally mentioned, these are presented as broad strokes rather than well-defined necessities.… Continue reading
President Trump’s speech to Congress included false claims about Canadian fentanyl imports and escalating trade wars, revealing his true intentions behind the tariffs. Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt explicitly linked the avoidance of future tariffs to Canadian statehood, exposing the tariffs as a tool of coercion rather than legitimate trade policy. This blatant bullying of an ally, as highlighted by Rolling Stone’s Asawin Suebsaeng, demonstrates Trump’s imperialist tendencies and warrants serious condemnation. The administration’s actions represent a dangerous abuse of power, undermining international relations through unsubstantiated accusations and economic threats.
Read More
Donald Trump’s aggressive rhetoric towards Canada, Greenland, and Panama, while often dismissed as unserious, reveals a potential return to a neo-imperialist American foreign policy. His actions, including threatened tariffs and territorial ambitions, echo past instances of American expansionism driven by economic and strategic interests. This aggressive, disruptive approach, exemplified by his administration’s actions and the support of figures like Elon Musk, aims to exert control over politics, trade, and territory through intimidation and manipulation. Ultimately, this behavior necessitates a strong response from democratic nations to prevent the erosion of global stability and democratic values.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood