Despite falling just short of a popular vote majority at 49.97%, President-elect Trump achieved his highest ever percentage in a presidential election, surpassing his previous totals from 2016 and 2020. This narrow margin underscores the nation’s deep political divisions, with the result representing only a marginal shift to the right. While Trump secured a decisive Electoral College victory, Republican gains in Congress were less substantial than anticipated. Lower than expected turnout in several states, coupled with reduced Democratic support for Harris compared to Biden in 2020, contributed to Trump’s improved popular vote showing.
Read More
Despite President-elect Trump’s claim of a “powerful mandate” following his electoral college victory, his narrow popular vote margin—near the bottom for American presidents—raises questions about the extent of public support for his agenda. While Republicans cite his electoral success and control of Congress as evidence of a mandate, Democrats argue the results do not justify circumventing established processes, such as Senate confirmation for Cabinet members. Scholars further dispute the very concept of a presidential mandate, highlighting its historical misuse and potential for undermining democratic balance of power. Ultimately, Trump’s ability to enact his ambitious policies hinges on his approach to governing and whether he can build consensus beyond his base.
Read More
Despite Donald Trump’s claim of an “unprecedented mandate,” his victory was narrow, with a popular vote margin smaller than Hillary Clinton’s 2016 margin and falling short of a majority. His Electoral College win, while significant, was also less substantial than previous victories by Obama and Bush. Furthermore, Republican control of Congress is tenuous, potentially hindering his agenda. Therefore, the assertion of a powerful mandate is unsubstantiated by the election results.
Read More
Trump Won Less Than 50 Percent. Why Is Everyone Calling It a Landslide?
Trump’s victory, while significant, didn’t achieve a majority of the popular vote. This raises the question: why the “landslide” narrative? The perception of a landslide victory seems to stem from several interconnected factors.
One contributing factor is the historical context. A Republican hasn’t won the popular vote in two decades, making Trump’s win, regardless of the margin, a notable event for the party. This rarity inflates the perceived significance of the victory.
Furthermore, the initial election night reporting played a crucial role in shaping public perception. Early vote counts showed a significant lead for Trump, fueled by a comparatively slower count of Democratic votes.… Continue reading
Despite Republican claims of a mandate, President-elect Trump’s victory was narrow, with a popular vote margin of roughly 2.4 million votes—smaller than Hillary Clinton’s margin over Trump in 2016. This close victory, representing less than 50% of the popular vote, contradicts initial perceptions of a landslide. Nevertheless, figures like House Speaker Mike Johnson are leveraging this outcome to justify controversial cabinet picks and push for an agenda they frame as reflecting the popular will. This assertion of a mandate is being used to promote significant changes within government agencies.
Read More
Despite initial claims of a landslide victory, Donald Trump’s popular vote percentage has dropped below 50%, significantly narrowing his margin over Kamala Harris. His final popular vote share will likely be among the lowest for a winning president in recent history, contradicting his assertions of an “unprecedented and powerful mandate.” While he retains the presidency via the Electoral College, his significantly diminished popular vote margin undermines his claims of a decisive win.
Read More
Despite projections of a landslide victory, Donald Trump’s win was closer than anticipated, securing only a two-point margin over Vice President Kamala Harris in the popular vote. While this outcome is unfavorable for Democrats, it falls short of a complete repudiation of their party. The blame game within the Democratic Party is unproductive and obscures the larger challenges facing the country. We must move beyond finger-pointing and focus on developing strategies to block Trump’s agenda, particularly his plans for mass deportations, as signaled by his initial appointments to key positions.
Read More
The electoral college has got to go. It’s an outdated, archaic system that no longer serves the interests of the American people. It’s mind-boggling that in this day and age, a candidate can win the popular vote by millions and still lose the election due to the electoral college. How is that fair or democratic?
The argument that without the electoral college, presidential candidates would only focus on more populated areas doesn’t hold water. The majority of Americans didn’t even live in urban areas until 1920, so this notion is simply unfounded. Plus, the fact that a reported 79% of campaign ad money has gone into just 7 states since Kamala entered the race shows just how skewed the electoral college system is.… Continue reading
The issue of the Electoral College has been a contentious topic for many years, with advocates and opponents on both sides fiercely defending their positions. Recently, Governor Walz made a statement calling for the abolition of the Electoral College, asserting that it is time to move beyond outdated systems that don’t serve everyone equally. And you know what? I couldn’t agree more.
The concept of the Electoral College, designed to prevent the tyranny of the majority and ensure fair representation for smaller states, has often come under scrutiny. While it may have had its place in the past, it no longer reflects the will of the people in a true democracy.… Continue reading
I wholeheartedly agree with Walz’s statement that the Electoral College ‘needs to go.’ The very concept of the Electoral College goes against the fundamental principle of democracy, which is one person, one vote. In a system where the popular vote does not always determine the outcome of an election, it is clear that the voices of the people are not being truly represented.
The Electoral College skews representation by favoring smaller states, giving them more weight in the election process. This creates an imbalance and undermines the principle of equality in voting rights. The fact that a candidate can win the presidency without securing the popular vote is a glaring flaw in the system that needs to be rectified.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood