A resurfaced 2020 video shows President Trump stating that National Guard deployment requires a governor’s request, directly contradicting his recent actions in California. Despite California Governor Newsom’s request to withdraw the National Guard, Trump deployed 2,000 troops to Los Angeles, leading to arrests and escalating violence. Newsom subsequently filed a lawsuit, alleging Trump illegally federalized the National Guard and threatened to deploy troops to other states without governors’ consent. Trump responded by suggesting Newsom’s arrest.
Read More
Following immigration raids in Los Angeles, President Trump authorized the deployment of 2,000 National Guard members and 700 Marines, prompting Governor Newsom to denounce the move as reckless and a violation of state sovereignty. California subsequently filed a lawsuit challenging the deployment, arguing that Trump overstepped his authority. Days of protests, initially peaceful, escalated into clashes with law enforcement, resulting in arrests and property damage. The deployment marks a significant escalation, with the last such action without gubernatorial consent occurring in 1965.
Read More
Retired Major General Randy Manner criticized President Trump’s federal deployment of the National Guard to Los Angeles, arguing it undermines states’ rights and freedom of speech. He asserted that California Governor Newsom possesses sufficient law enforcement resources and the authority to handle the situation. Manner highlighted the inappropriateness of using the National Guard in this context, emphasizing that governors should manage their states’ internal affairs. This action, while currently legal, is viewed as an overreach of federal power.
Read More
California Attorney General Rob Bonta filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration, alleging the federalization of 2,000 California National Guard members was unlawful and an overreach of presidential authority. Bonta argues the deployment was unnecessary, as protests had subsided before the action, and that it diverted crucial resources from wildfire preparedness. The suit seeks a court order to halt the deployment, claiming the president abused his power for political gain and infringed upon the governor’s authority. The White House countered that the deployment was necessary to quell unrest, while Governor Newsom accused Trump of manufacturing a crisis for political purposes.
Read More
President Trump deployed the National Guard to Los Angeles, overriding Governor Newsom’s objections, in response to anti-ICE protests. This action, condemned by both Newsom and Mayor Bass as inflammatory and escalatory, saw troops stationed near a federal complex where undocumented immigrants were being detained by masked federal agents. The deployment, the first of its kind in decades without gubernatorial consent, followed several days of controversial ICE raids resulting in injuries and arrests of protesters, including a union leader. The situation is characterized by accusations of excessive force, illegal detentions, and the deliberate provocation of unrest.
Read More
Governor Newsom formally requested the Trump administration to rescind its order deploying the National Guard to Los Angeles, citing the action as unlawful and inflammatory. The deployment followed ICE raids and subsequent protests, with Newsom and Mayor Bass arguing that local law enforcement is sufficient and that federal intervention escalates tensions. The Trump administration, however, maintains the deployment is necessary to restore order, framing the situation as a crisis stemming from insufficient state response to violence. The dispute highlights the ongoing conflict between sanctuary jurisdictions and federal immigration policy.
Read More
Senator Sanders condemned President Trump’s deployment of the National Guard to Los Angeles during immigration protests as a move towards authoritarianism, noting the action was taken without the request of local officials. He cited this, along with Trump’s attacks on the media, legal firms, universities, and judges, as evidence of a president exceeding his constitutional authority and undermining the rule of law. Sanders emphasized the critical role of Republican members of Congress in upholding the Constitution and preventing further erosion of democratic norms. This action follows widespread criticism of the deployment and mirrors similar presidential actions only seen during the 1992 Los Angeles riots.
Read More
President Trump’s plan to deploy 2,000 National Guard troops to quell anti-ICE protests in Los Angeles has sparked widespread condemnation from Democrats. California Governor Gavin Newsom and other prominent figures denounced the move as “deranged behavior” and “purposefully inflammatory,” citing the lack of necessity and the potential for escalating tensions. Critics argue that the deployment, including threats to mobilize active-duty Marines, is an abuse of power and undermines democratic processes. The action has drawn parallels to dictatorial tactics, further intensifying the political backlash.
Read More
Approximately 300 National Guard troops were deployed to Los Angeles by President Trump, marking the first such deployment without a governor’s request in decades. This action, taken amidst protests against immigration enforcement, followed days of clashes between demonstrators and federal agents, resulting in arrests and the use of tear gas. Governor Newsom and Mayor Bass criticized the deployment as an overreaction, while the Trump administration justified it as a necessary response to quell unrest and protect federal facilities. The deployment has sparked significant political debate, with some viewing it as an overreach of presidential power.
Read More
Trump is deploying the National Guard under a rarely used power, and that’s raising a lot of eyebrows. It’s a move that feels both unprecedented and eerily familiar, harkening back to a time when such actions were used to quell civil rights movements. The deployment itself seems disproportionate to the situation on the ground, with reports suggesting relatively small-scale protests and minimal violence.
This raises serious questions about the justification for such a heavy-handed response. Why now? Why not during the January 6th insurrection, when there were actual acts of violence and an attack on the Capitol? The contrast is stark and unsettling, hinting at a potential abuse of power.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood