The prevailing sentiment, according to a recent NPR-Ipsos poll, indicates that Americans generally oppose Trump’s deployment of the National Guard to major cities for law enforcement purposes. The poll revealed that only 38% of respondents supported the move, while a concerning 49% expressed opposition. A significant 12% remained unsure, raising questions about their understanding of the situation.
The level of indecision, that 12% of “unsure” responses, is worth considering. It suggests a lack of awareness or concern that allows for such militarization to be entertained. Perhaps it reflects a detachment from the realities of life in these cities or a lack of historical context regarding such actions.… Continue reading
Mississippi Governor Tate Reeves has approved the deployment of approximately 200 Mississippi National Guard soldiers to Washington, D.C. The purpose of the deployment is to support President Trump’s initiative to restore law and order in the nation’s capital. This action follows President Trump’s executive order to federalize local police forces and activate about 800 District of Columbia National Guard members. The governor believes the Mississippi National Guard will effectively enhance public safety and support law enforcement in the city.
Read More
A federal appeals court temporarily allowed President Trump to deploy the National Guard in Los Angeles to quell anti-ICE protests, rejecting, however, his claim of unreviewable authority. Trump misinterpreted the ruling as a complete victory, using it to threaten nationwide National Guard deployments whenever he deems it necessary. This decision hinges on the court’s acceptance of the administration’s claim that protests impede federal law enforcement, despite evidence to the contrary and the court’s granting of excessive deference to the president’s assertion. The ruling raises serious concerns about the president’s willingness to abuse his power and the judiciary’s ability to restrain him.
Read More
A federal appeals court upheld President Trump’s authority to deploy the National Guard during immigration raids, overturning a temporary restraining order. This decision, celebrated by Trump on Truth Social, affirmed the president’s power to federalize the National Guard when necessary to enforce federal law. Trump subsequently threatened to utilize the National Guard in other American cities facing similar situations, suggesting a broader deployment strategy. The ruling hinges on the president’s power to act when regular forces are insufficient.
Read More
President Trump’s deployment of the National Guard and Marines to Los Angeles to quell purportedly violent protests was deemed illegal and unconstitutional by a federal court, though this ruling is temporarily blocked. This action, along with the forceful removal of Senator Padilla at a press conference, demonstrates Trump’s authoritarian tendencies and disregard for constitutional rights. The protests themselves were largely non-violent, and Trump’s justification is considered a pretext to consolidate power. His planned military parade, coinciding with his birthday, further underscores his self-aggrandizement and misuse of military resources.
Read More
Approximately 60 protesters, primarily veterans and military families affiliated with Veterans for Peace, were arrested near the U.S. Capitol for unlawful demonstration and crossing police lines during a protest against President Trump’s Army anniversary parade. The demonstration, which occurred on the eve of the parade, opposed the deployment of National Guard troops and called for reallocation of funds towards social programs. Arrests resulted from protesters breaching a police perimeter while running towards the Capitol building. Some protesters also face additional charges of assaulting officers and resisting arrest.
Read More
Judge Charles Breyer ruled President Trump’s deployment of the National Guard to Los Angeles illegal, citing violations of the Tenth Amendment and exceeding presidential authority. The order returns control of the California National Guard to the state, effective immediately. Breyer’s decision also highlighted threats to protesters’ First Amendment rights and the state’s inability to utilize the Guard for essential services. The Trump administration has appealed the ruling, while Governor Newsom warned of a broader threat to state sovereignty and democracy nationwide.
Read More
National Guard troops and Marines deployed to Los Angeles to quell anti-Trump protests express deep dissatisfaction with their assignment, citing concerns about being used as political pawns in a domestic operation outside their expertise. Multiple advocacy groups representing military families report widespread unhappiness among service members, with no dissenting opinions heard. The deployment, ordered by President Trump without California’s governor’s consent, has been criticized as a provocation, with reports of inadequate living conditions for the troops. Public opinion polls reveal significant disapproval of both the deployment and Trump’s immigration policies.
Read More
President Trump’s deployment of approximately 4,000 National Guard troops to Los Angeles in response to protests has been met with sharp criticism, with Governor Newsom alleging the move is a political stunt. Of the initially deployed 2,000 troops, only around 300 have been actively deployed, leaving the remainder idle and without sufficient supplies in federal buildings. Newsom further condemns the deployment of 700 Marines as a violation of democratic principles, and the state’s attorney general has filed a lawsuit challenging the legality of the president’s actions. The White House maintains the deployment is necessary to stabilize the region, but the lack of active engagement by the majority of troops fuels accusations of misuse of military resources.
Read More
California Governor Gavin Newsom is suing the Trump administration for illegally deploying the National Guard without gubernatorial consent, a move impacting all states. This action, deemed unconstitutional and immoral, violates a statute mandating that mobilization orders be issued through state governors. Newsom further criticizes the deployment of Marines and additional National Guard troops as a divisive tactic inciting fear and chaos. He asserts that the situation is not about immigration but about upholding democratic principles and the rule of law.
Read More
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker