Ocasio-Cortez’s assertion that J.D. Vance “lied to the world” about free speech stems from a broader context of Vance’s controversial remarks during a Munich speech. The essence of her criticism hinges on a perceived hypocrisy: Vance’s claims regarding threats to American democracy while simultaneously associating with, and even seemingly endorsing, groups considered anti-democratic by many. This contradiction, according to Ocasio-Cortez, represents a profound dishonesty.
The core of the disagreement centers around Vance’s characterization of the situation in America. He presented a narrative emphasizing internal threats to American democracy, suggesting that certain behaviors within the country pose a greater risk than external actors like Russia or China.… Continue reading
Behind-the-scenes at the Munich Security Conference, the US pressured Ukraine to immediately sign a proposed mineral resources deal in exchange for a meeting with Vice President JD Vance, threatening to cancel the meeting otherwise. Kyiv refused to sign the US’s proposed version of the agreement, rejecting proposed amendments. Despite this refusal, the meeting proceeded as planned after the US dropped its demand. The initial US request was interpreted by Ukraine as a figurative expression of urgency, but proved to be a literal precondition for the meeting. Zelenskyy’s refusal to sign under pressure ultimately led to constructive dialogue.
Read More
At the Munich Security Conference, German and UK foreign ministers Annalena Baerbock and David Lammy declared Ukraine’s NATO accession irreversible, framing it as the most cost-effective long-term security solution for Europe. Both emphasized that maintaining NATO membership as an option for Ukraine is significantly more affordable than alternative security measures. This stance aligns with ongoing Allied discussions and President Zelenskyy’s assertion that Ukraine will not compromise on NATO aspirations. Lammy further noted that even with a resolution to the current conflict, enduring security concerns necessitate continued dialogue with the US on future security guarantees.
Read More
Addressing the Munich Security Conference, President Zelenskyy reaffirmed Ukraine’s commitment to pursuing NATO membership, emphasizing that this goal remains non-negotiable. He underscored the need for strong, unified European and American security guarantees for Ukraine, warning that solely European guarantees would be insufficient. Zelenskyy also highlighted intelligence indicating a potential Russian troop deployment to Belarus in 2025, posing a significant threat to both Ukraine and NATO allies. He stressed that Ukraine’s military, not NATO, successfully repelled the initial Russian invasion.
Read More
At the Munich Security Conference, Vice President JD Vance controversially argued that the greatest threat to America’s European allies is internal, downplaying foreign election interference. He asserted that easily swayed democracies are inherently weak and that expressing opinions, even from influential foreign actors, doesn’t constitute interference. His remarks were sharply criticized by German Defense Minister Boris Pistorius as unacceptable, particularly given the rise of the far-right AfD party in Germany. Vance’s speech, which minimized the impact of Russian meddling, was widely mocked on social media.
Read More
In a controversial move, US Vice President JD Vance met with Alice Weidel, leader of Germany’s far-right AfD party, prompting outrage in German political circles. This meeting, weeks before a German election, follows similar interactions between the AfD and figures close to Donald Trump, highlighting a growing US engagement with Europe’s far-right. Vance’s subsequent speech at the Munich Security Conference, criticizing European leaders for not working with far-right parties, further strained US-European relations. The German chancellor and other officials strongly condemned Vance’s actions and statements.
Read More
During a Munich Security Conference panel, President Zelenskyy revealed his February 12th conversation with President Trump, expressing disbelief in Putin’s purported desire for peace. Zelenskyy directly challenged Trump’s assessment of Putin’s intentions, emphasizing the significant risks to Ukraine and the world should negotiations proceed without Ukrainian involvement. He recounted past broken agreements with Putin, highlighting the importance of Ukraine’s participation in any peace negotiations. Zelenskyy stressed the principle that no decisions concerning Ukraine should be made without Ukrainian input.
Read More
At the Munich Security Conference, Ukrainian President Zelenskyy reiterated his demand for security guarantees before engaging in talks with Russia, a position supported by the Trump administration’s stated goal of ending the war. Vice President Vance met with Zelenskyy, though no major breakthroughs were announced, with both sides emphasizing a desire for peace but highlighting differing approaches to achieving it. The Trump administration’s pursuit of a swift resolution, potentially involving territorial concessions by Ukraine, has raised concerns among European allies regarding future security arrangements and the level of continued US support. This, coupled with a recent Russian drone strike on Chernobyl, has created uncertainty about the future of the conflict.
Read More
At the Munich Security Conference, Vice President JD Vance criticized European nations for internal issues, prioritizing them over external threats like Russia, sparking immediate backlash from European leaders. His comments, focusing on free speech and migration, were seen as undermining the transatlantic alliance and were directly rebuked by German officials. This incident further highlighted existing tensions stemming from the Trump administration’s handling of the Ukraine conflict, particularly concerning peace negotiations excluding Kyiv and Europe. Despite a subsequent meeting with Ukrainian President Zelenskyy, where Vance emphasized ending the war, the VP’s earlier remarks underscored a growing divergence in views between the US and its European allies.
Read More
This year’s Munich Security Conference risks repeating the disastrous 1938 conference’s failures. A parallel is drawn between the current geopolitical climate and the appeasement of Hitler, suggesting a similar blindness to current threats. Concerns are raised that a policy of appeasement is resurfacing in Munich. The conference’s atmosphere is characterized as one where a dangerous lack of decisive action is looming.
Read More
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker